SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Björgvinsson Erling 1969) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Björgvinsson Erling 1969)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 17
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Beech, Dave, et al. (författare)
  • Exclusion: Editorial Introduction
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: PARSE Journal. ; :8
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
    • The editorial reflects on exclusion highlighting various aspects of exclusion in education and the arts such as educational exclusion, participation as exclusion, colonisation and decolonization, indigeneity, and geographies of exclusion.
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  • Björgvinsson, Erling, 1969, et al. (författare)
  • City Symphony Malmö: the spatial politics of non-institutional memory
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: Journal of Media Practice. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1468-2753 .- 2040-0926. ; 17:2-3, s. 138-156
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • City Symphony Malmö was a collaborative documentary that engaged citizens of Malmö in recording short film sequences. The Symphony’ video material was also performed at the art and performance centre Inkonst where electronic musicians improvised to VJ’s digital and analogue live mixing of the material. A remediation of the performance was streamed live on the Internet with live footage from the performance. All clips were released under the creative commons licence and made available for remixing through The Pirate Bay. This article explores what it can imply to hand over the means of film production to citizens. The discussion concentrates on participatory and spatially distributed filmmaking and screening of non-institutional memories, produced in the symphony. The analysis merges influence from silent cinema and Soviet Montage [Vertov, Dziga. 1929. A Man with a Movie Camera. Documentary/City Symphony Film], theories of public memory [e.g. Casey, Edward. 2004. “Public Memory in Place and Time.” In Framing Public Memory, edited by Kendall R. Phillips, 17–46. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press; Young, David E. 2000. At Memory’s Edge. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; Bodnar, John. 1992. Remaking America: Public Memory, Commemoration, and Patriotism in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press], new media [Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press; Manovich, Lew. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.] and place [Appadurai, Arjan. 1996. Modernity at Large. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; Lefebvre, Henri. (1974) 1991. The Production of Space. Translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers; Harvey, David. 1993. “From Space to Place and Back Again.” In Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Exchange, edited by Jon Bird, Barry Curtis, Tim Putnam, George Robertson, and Lisa Tickner, 3–29. London: Routledge]. It describes the complexities of creating non-institutional memory and archiving practices and argues that such citizen-driven and non-institutional memories may challenge official history and societal memory production, yet also reproduce typical and iconic images which reveal spatio-material hierarchies. Such complexities demonstrate the value of an analysis of participation and spatio-material dimensions of public memory as unfolded in the article.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Björgvinsson, Erling, 1969, et al. (författare)
  • Hospitalisation and Spatial Vagueness: Patients’ Sense of Plasticity in a Care Environment
  • 2017
  • Ingår i: Caring Architecture: Institutions and Relational Practices. - Newcastle upon Tyne : Cambridge Scholars Publishing. - 9781443898966 ; , s. 33-49
  • Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Hospitalised patients are faced with a brute reorientation of their normal spatial needs and preferences and are forced to adjust spatially, so they start to re-arrange their own situation according to personal needs and site-specific circumstances. This re-arrangement includes material re-positioning of institutional objects and private things, but also adjusting to the presence and needs of hospital staff and other patients. Different types of spatial restraints and opportunities may emerge in this alignment with the hospital culture and thus patients’ preferences and spatial production within this environment need to be further investigated. Patients may need not only to produce a space of their own that allows subjective and intersubjective building of territories, but also to retain a certain movement of freedom in relation to the firmness of the socio-spatial programme and the architecture that exists in hospital wards. This chapter presents an investigation of patients’ socio-spatial concerns and preferences when hospitalised. The results indicate that more attention could be paid to patients’ concerns and preferences as regards spatial flexibility, reflecting the existential necessity for vagueness as an ingredient of space and the enacted experience of plasticity as the ability to give and take form. This leads on to the conclusion that applied concepts of space and the design of hospitals could take into account a more varied range of everyday space production according to those occupying the space.
  •  
9.
  • Björgvinsson, Erling, 1969, et al. (författare)
  • Introduction
  • 2017
  • Ingår i: PARSE. - 2002-0511. ; :5, s. 7-11
  • Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
  •  
10.
  • Björgvinsson, Erling, 1969 (författare)
  • Managing Collaborative Critique in Times of Financialisation Capitalism
  • 2017
  • Ingår i: PARSE. - 2002-0511. ; :5, s. 93-110
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Management is an integral aesthetic-political-economic aspect of design practices, whether conducted as research or as part of a professional practice. It includes situated coordination of partnerships made up of heterogeneous socio-material entities. Such coordination through modes of assembly and decision-making is essential when devising more democratic forms of co-design and collaborative critique. The article compares and contrasts assemblies that operate within dominant social systems through consensual processes with assemblies that operate outside of the dominant regime. Those that operate within dominant social systems through affirmative and additive critique have difficulty accounting for substantial change, and at best can engage in minor reformist aesthetic-political changes. Additive and affirmative ways of working also tend to hide the violence they produce. Those that operate outside of the dominant social system by negating, delinking and disaffirming established infrastructures through the development of new formations – re-assembling and re-infrastructuring – account for the violence of their critique and can empower marginalised positions. The article also contrasts collaborative critique through assemblies that focus on local dense actor-networks with those that acknowledge meso-level issues related to wider aesthetic-political-economic relations. What type of assemblies are devised, how does the scope of the site of intervention and the level of analytical abstraction orient what aspects of the issue worked on can be re-made?
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 17

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy