| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Gonzalez Lindh, Margareta, 1965-, et al.
(författare)
-
Subjective swallowing symptoms and related risk factors in COPD
- 2019
-
Ingår i: ERJ Open Research. - : European Respiratory Society. - 2312-0541. ; 5:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of subjective (i.e. self-reported) swallowing symptoms in a large cohort of patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and to identify potential related risk factors.Methods: A total of 571 patients with COPD, investigated in a stable phase, participated in this multicentre study (335 females, 236 males; mean age: 68.6 years (sd 7.7)). Data were derived from spirometry, a questionnaire and a 30-metre walking test.Results: In total, 33% (n=186) patients reported at least some degree of swallowing problem. The most frequently reported symptom was food lodging in the throat (23%). A significant relationship was found between swallowing symptoms and dyspnoea, assessed as modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) ≥2 compared with <2 (46% versus 22%; p<0.001) and health-related quality of life, assessed as the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) ≥10 (40% versus 19%; p<0.001). Swallowing problems were also related to lower physical capacity (p=0.02) but not to lung function (p>0.28).Conclusion: Subjective swallowing symptoms seem to be a common problem in patients with stable COPD. This problem is seen in all stages of the disease, but is more common in symptomatic patients and in patients with lower physical capacity.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Gonzalez Lindh, Margareta, 1965-, et al.
(författare)
-
Swallowing dysfunction in patients hospitalised due to a COPD exacerbation
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ERJ Open Research. - : European Respiratory Society. - 2312-0541. ; 7:2, s. 00173-2021-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the prevalence of self-reported and clinically screened swallowing dysfunction (dysphagia) in COPD patients with severe exacerbations and to identify any associated factors. Findings were then compared to a control group.Methods: Participants included 30 patients hospitalised due to a COPD exacerbation. The control group consisted of 30 adults hospitalised with acute cardiac symptoms. Data were derived from spirometry, the 150 mL timed water swallow test, a cookie swallow test and a dyspnoea questionnaire (modified Medical Research Council (mMRC)). Scores from the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) were calculated to assess patient perception of swallowing dysfunction.Results: Self-reported swallowing dysfunction and clinical signs thereof were more common in COPD patients than in the control group (67% versus 23% and 80% versus 37%, respectively; p <= 0.001). Clinical signs of swallowing dysfunction in the group with acute exacerbation of COPD were associated with self-reported swallowing dysfunction (p=0.02) and xerostomia (p=0.04). Dyspnoea (mMRC >= 2) was more common among the COPD patients (90% versus 47%, p<0.001). There was a significant negative correlation between lung function and self-reported dysphagia (r=-0.39, p=0.03), but not between lung function and clinically screened dysphagia (r=-0.23, p=0.21).Conclusion: COPD patients hospitalised with an acute exacerbation experienced significantly more self-reported and clinically screened swallowing dysfunction compared to a control group of patients with cardiac symptoms. Both patient groups experienced dyspnoea, but it was twice as common in the group with acute exacerbation of COPD. Both groups also experienced xerostomia.
|
|
| 7. |
- Gonzalez Lindh, Margareta, 1965-
(författare)
-
Swallowing Dysfunction in Respiratory Diseases : Prevalence and risk factors in COPD and COVID-19
- 2022
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Objective: Swallowing dysfunction, dysphagia, is a common, sometimes dangerous, and often neglected problem that affects many people. The prevalence is estimated to be approximately 8% in the general population which makes it as common as e.g. diabetes or asthma. Dysphagia can cause serious complications like malnutrition, aspiration pneumonia and even death. The aims of this thesis were to gain further knowledge and a broader understanding of the prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of swallowing dysfunction in patients with respiratory diseases. Specifically Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, and COVID-19 after invasive mechanical ventilation.Study I is a prospective explorative study of 51 COPD patients in stable phase. Swallowing function was evaluated through a questionnaire and through two swallowing tests (water and a cookie) and lung function was measured through a spirometry. The prevalence of self- reported swallowing dysfunction was 65% and the screened prevalence was 49%. There was a negative correlation between lung function and both measurements of swallowing function, i.e. the poorer the lung function the more dysphagia symptoms.Study II is a cross-sectional multi-centre study where we examined the prevalence of self-reported swallowing dysfunction in 571 COPD patients. Additional tests were: spirometry, physical capacity, mMRC and CAT. Subjective swallowing symptoms were found in 33% of the patients. More prevalent in symptomatic patients and patients with lower physical capacity. A high score on the mMRC or CAT and a classification in GOLD groups B and D may be predictive of a swallowing dysfunction and should be addressed by the COPD nurse or physician.Study III is a cross-sectional study of 30 COPD patients hospitalized with a severe exacerbation. Their swallowing function was compared to a control group. The main results of this study were that the prevalence of swallowing dysfunction, both patient-reported and screened in patients hospitalised with a COPD exacerbation, was high. In addition, the AECOPD group was almost three times more likely to suffer from self-reported dysphagia compared to the control group.Study IV is a longitudinal cohort study of swallowing function in 28 COVID-19 patients post invasive mechanical ventilation. Dysphagia was found in 71% of the patients at baseline and it was associated with number of days in the hospital and in the ICU. At discharge from the hospital swallowing function and tolerance of oral intake had improved significantly.Conclusion: Swallowing dysfunction is prevalent both in COPD and in COVID-19 patients post invasive mechanical ventilation.
|
|
| 8. |
- Gonzalez Lindh, Margareta, 1965-, et al.
(författare)
-
Swallowing function in COVID-19 patients after invasive mechanical ventilation
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. - : Elsevier. - 2590-1095. ; 4:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To explore swallowing function and risk factors associated with delayed recovery of swallowing in patients with COVID-19 post–invasive mechanical ventilation using the Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS).Design: Longitudinal cohort study.Setting: Three secondary-level hospitals.Participants: Invasively ventilated patients (N=28) who were hospitalized with severe COVID-19 and referred to the hospitals’ speech and language pathology (SLP) departments after mechanical ventilation between March 5 and July 5, 2020 for an evaluation of swallowing function before commencing oral diet.Interventions: SLP assessment, advice, and therapy for dysphagia.Main Outcome Measures: Oral intake levels at baseline and hospital discharge according to the FOIS. Patients were stratified according to FOIS (1-5, dysphagia; 6-7, functional oral intake). Data regarding comorbidities, frailty, intubation and tracheostomy, proning, and SLP evaluation were collected.Results: Dysphagia was found in 71% of the patients at baseline (79% men; age, 61±12y; body mass index, 30±8 kg/m2). The median FOIS score at baseline was 2 (interquartile range [IQR], 1) vs 5 (IQR, 2.5) at hospital discharge. Patients with dysphagia were older (64±8.5y vs 53±16y; P=.019), had a higher incidence of hypertension (70% vs 12%; P=.006), and were ventilated invasively longer (16±7d vs 10±2d; P=.017) or had a tracheostomy (9±9d vs 1±2d; P=.03) longer. A negative association was found between swallowing dysfunction at bedside and days hospitalized (r=–0.471, P=.01), and number of days in the intensive care unit (ICU) (r=–0.48, P=.01).Conclusion: Dysphagia is prevalent in COVID-19 patients after invasive mechanical ventilation and is associated with number of days in hospital and number of days in the ICU. Swallowing function and tolerance of oral diet improved at discharge (P<.001).
|
|
| 9. |
- Okhiria, Åsa, et al.
(författare)
-
Greater Palatal Cleft Width Predicts an Increased Risk for Unfavorable Outcomes in Cleft Palate Repair.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. - : Sage. - 1055-6656 .- 1545-1569. ; 59:8, s. 1030-1037
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of cleft width and cleft type on the need for secondary surgery and velopharyngeal competence from a longitudinal perspective.DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal study.SETTING: A single multidisciplinary craniofacial team at a university hospital.PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate and cleft palate only (n = 313) born from 1984 to 2002, treated with 2-stage palatal surgery, were reviewed. A total of 213 patients were included.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The impact of initial cleft width and cleft type on secondary surgery. Assessment of hypernasality, audible nasal emission, and glottal articulation from routine follow-ups from 3 to 16 years of age. The assessments were compared with reassessments of 10% of the recordings.RESULTS: Cleft width, but not cleft type, predicted the need for secondary surgery, either due to palatal dehiscence or velopharyngeal insufficiency. The distribution of cleft width between the scale steps on a 4-point scale for hypernasality and audible nasal emission differed significantly at 5 years of age but not at any other age. Presence of glottal articulation differed significantly at 3 and 5 years of age. No differences between cleft types were seen at any age for any speech variable.CONCLUSIONS: Cleft width emerged as a predictor of the need for secondary surgery as well as more deviance in speech variables related to velopharyngeal competence during the preschool years. Cleft type was not related to the need for secondary surgery nor speech outcome at any age.
|
|
| 10. |
- Okhiria, Åsa, et al.
(författare)
-
Longitudinal data on speech outcomes in internationally adopted children compared with non-adopted children with cleft lip and palate
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International journal of language and communication disorders. - : Wiley. - 1368-2822 .- 1460-6984. ; 58:5, s. 1440-1453
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundAt the beginning of the 21st century, international adoptions of children with cleft lip and/or palate increased dramatically in Sweden. Many children arrived partially or totally unoperated, despite being at an age when palatoplasty has usually been performed. To date, the speech development of internationally adopted (IA) children has been described up to age 7-8 years, but later development remains unstudied. AimsTo investigate speech development between ages 5 and 10 years in children born with cleft lip and palate (CLP) adopted from China and to compare them with non-adopted (NA) children with CLP. A secondary aim was to compare the frequencies of secondary palatal surgery and number of visits to a speech and language pathologist (SLP) between the groups. Methods & ProceduresIn a longitudinal study, 23 IA children from China were included and matched with 23 NA children born in Sweden. Experienced SLPs blindly reassessed audio recordings from routine follow-ups at ages 5 and 10 years. Velopharyngeal function (VPF) was assessed with the composite score for velopharyngeal competence (VPC-Sum) for single words and rated on a three-point scale (VPC-Rate) in sentence repetition. Target sounds in words and sentences were phonetically transcribed. Per cent correct consonants (PCC) were calculated at word and sentence levels. For in-depth analyses, articulation errors were divided into cleft speech characteristics (CSCs), developmental speech characteristics (DSCs) and s-errors. Information on secondary palatal surgery and number of visits to an SLP was collected. Outcomes & ResultsVPF differed significantly between the groups at both ages when assessed with VPC-Sum, but not with VPC-Rate. Regardless of the method for assessing VPF, a similar proportion in both groups had incompetent VPF but fewer IA than NA children had competent VPF at both ages. IA children had lower PCC at both ages at both word and sentence levels. More IA children had CSCs, DSCs and s-errors at age 5 years, and CSCs and s-errors at age 10. The development of PCC was significant in both groups between ages 5 and 10 years. The proportion of children receiving secondary palatal surgery did not differ significantly between the groups, nor did number of SLP visits. Conclusions & ImplicationsCSCs were more persistent in IA children than in NA children at age 10 years. Interventions should target both cleft and DSCs, be comprehensive and continue past the pre-school years. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDSWhat is already known on this subjectAt the beginning of the 21st century, IA children with cleft lip and/or palate arrived in Sweden partially or totally unoperated, despite being at an age when palatoplasty has usually been performed. Studies up to age 7-8 years show that adopted children, compared with NA peers, have poorer articulation skills, demonstrate both cleft-related and developmental articulation errors, and are more likely to have velopharyngeal incompetence. Several studies also report that adopted children more often require secondary palatal surgery due to fistulas, dehiscence or velopharyngeal incompetence compared with NA peers. What this paper adds to existing knowledgeThis longitudinal study provides additional knowledge based on longer follow-ups than previous studies. It shows that the proportion of children assessed to have incompetent VPF was similar among IA and NA children. It was no significant difference between the groups regarding the proportion that received secondary palatal surgery. However, fewer IA children were assessed to have a competent VPF. Developmental articulation errors have ceased in most IA and all NA children at age 10 years, but significantly more adopted children than NA children still have cleft-related articulation errors. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work?Speech and language therapy should target both cleft-related and developmental articulation errors. When needed, treatment must be initiated early, comprehensive, and continued past the pre-school years, not least for adopted children.
|
|
