| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Brignole, Michele, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical controversy : methodology and indications of cardioneuroablation for reflex syncope
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology. - 1532-2092. ; 25:5, s. 1-10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In 2005, Pachon et al.1 proposed cardiac vagal denervation to treat neurally mediated syncope. Since then, a metanalysis of observational studies2 and a recent randomized controlled trial (RCT)3 have provided some evidence that cardioneuroablation (CNA) is able to prevent syncope recurrence at least during the first 2 years following the procedure in patients affected by reflex syncope. In brief, the recent metanalysis2 of 14 studies including a total of 465 patients reported an average freedom of syncopal recurrence in 92% of patients (95% confidence interval 88–95%) during follow-up. The only available open RCT3 reported 8% recurrence of syncope in the 24 patients randomized to CNA and 54% recurrence rate in 24 untreated controls (P = 0.0004) during 2-year follow-up. In all studies, after the ablation procedure, the patients demonstrated heart rate increase together with reduction of heart rate variability (indicating impaired parasympathetic stimulation of the heart) persisting at least for 2 years. This provides proof-of-concept for the modification of the vagal ganglia activity in the heart.Given these facts, it is likely that CNA will become increasingly popular among physicians caring for syncope patients in the years to come. Nevertheless, many issues concerning clinical indications, methodology, and long-term results remain unresolved. These issues constitute the background of this manuscript in which leaders in CNA and experts in syncope debated critical issues and aimed to find agreement and, if not possible, to highlight the controversies that could be addressed in future studies. The authors were initially requested to give their evidence-based opinion on several predefined motions. These were merged into a manuscript draft, which was subsequently critically revised by means of two rounds of comments.
|
|
| 5. |
- Brignole, Michele, et al.
(författare)
-
Low-blood pressure phenotype underpins the tendency to reflex syncope
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Hypertension. - 1473-5598. ; 39:7, s. 1319-1325
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that cardiovascular physiology differs in reflex syncope patients compared with the general population, predisposing such individuals to vasovagal reflex.METHODS: In this multicohort cross-sectional study, we compared aggregate data of resting SBP, DBP, pulse pressure (PP) and heart rate (HR), collected from six community-based cohort studies (64 968 observations) with those from six databases of reflex syncope patients (6516 observations), subdivided by age decades and sex.RESULTS: Overall, in male individuals with reflex syncope, SBP (-3.4 mmHg) and PP (-9.2 mmHg) were lower and DBP (+2.8 mmHg) and HR (+5.1 bpm) were higher than in the general population; the difference in SBP was higher at ages above 60 years. In female individuals, PP (-6.0 mmHg) was lower and DBP (+4.7 mmHg) and HR (+4.5 bpm) were higher than in the general population; differences in SBP were less pronounced, becoming evident only above 60 years. Compared with male individuals, SBP in female individuals exhibited slower increase until age 40 years, and then demonstrated steeper increase that continued throughout remaining life.CONCLUSION: The patients prone to reflex syncope demonstrate a different resting cardiovascular haemodynamic profile as compared with a general population, characterized by lower SBP and PP, reflecting reduced venous return and lower stroke volume, and a higher HR and DBP, suggesting the activation of compensatory mechanisms. Our data contribute to a better understanding why some individuals with similar demographic characteristics develop reflex syncope and others do not.VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/HJH/B580.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Brignole, Michele, et al.
(författare)
-
The Rate of Asystolic Reflex Syncope Is Not Influenced by Age
- 2024
-
Ingår i: JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology. - 2405-5018. ; 10:3, s. 566-574
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The head-up tilt test (HUT) and other evidence suggest that the vagal effect on the heart decreases with age.OBJECTIVES: The main aim of the study was to assess whether this age effect also affects the rate of asystole in spontaneous reflex syncope (RS).METHOD: We performed an analysis of pooled individual data from 4 studies that recruited patients ≥40 years of age affected by certain or suspected RS who received an implantable loop recorder (ILR) and reported follow-up data on syncope recurrence. We assessed the presence of asystolic syncope of >3 seconds or nonsyncopal asystole of >6 seconds recorded by ILR and compared the findings to tilt test results on the same patients.RESULTS: A total of 1,046 patients received ILR because of unexplained syncope. Of these, 201 (19.2%) had a documentation of an asystolic event of 10-second (Q1-Q3: 6- to 15-second) duration. They were subdivided in 3 age tertiles: ≤60 years (n = 64), 61 to 72 years (n = 72), and ≥73 years (n = 65). The rate of asystolic events was similar in the 3 subgroups (50.1%, 50.1%, and 49.2%, respectively; P = 0.99). Conversely, the rate of asystolic syncope induced during HUT (performed in 169 of 201) was greatly age dependent (31.0%, 12.1%, and 11.1% in increasing age tertiles, respectively; P = 0.009).CONCLUSIONS: The rate of the spontaneous asystolic form of RS documented by ILR is constant at any age >40 years. Conversely, the rate of asystolic syncope induced by HUT is higher in younger patients and decreases with age. The contrasting results between spontaneous and tilt-induced events cast doubt on the concept that asystole in RS is less common in older patients.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
