| 1. |
- Wänman, Johan, 1983-
(författare)
-
Clinical and morphological aspects of metastatic spinal cord compression
- 2022
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is a serious complication of cancer leading to demyelination and axonal damage of the spinal cord with a risk of para/tetraplegia. It is most common in patients with known cancer but may also be the initial manifestation of malignancy (IMM). Patients with MSCC as the IMM have rarely been studied as a separate group. The interaction between the tumour and bone in spinal bone metastasis interferes with regulatory mechanisms, causing the formation of less mechanically competent bone and increasing the risk of spinal instability and fracture. The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) has been proposed as a tool in order to help clinicians evaluate tumour-related spinal instability. The SINS has shown excellent inter- and intraobserver reliability, but its prognostic value is still controversial. Bone metastases from prostate cancer are generally classified as osteoblastic due to increased bone formation. However, this categorization is probably oversimplified since there are overlapping bone cell activities between osteoblastic and osteolytic metastases. Prostate cancer bone metastases can also have a myeloma-like radiological appearance, but little is known about this subgroup of lesions. Aims: The aims of this work were as follows: a) to evaluate outcomes after surgery in patients with MSCC as the IMM; b) to analyse the prognostic value of the SINS regarding survival and neurological function after surgery for MSCC in patients with prostate cancer and haematological malignancies; and c) to analyse the clinical and morphological features of prostate cancer spinal bone metastases with a myeloma-like radiological appearance. Patients and methods: In studies I-III, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes after surgery for MSCC in patients with MSCC as the IMM (study I, n=69), prostate cancer (study II, n=110) and haematological malignancies (study III, n=48). In study IV, tumour tissue samples from bone metastases obtained during surgery for MSCC in 110 patients with prostate cancer were analysed by immunohistochemistry and molecular transcriptomic analyses, and the results were related to the radiological appearance and clinical outcomes. Results: Study I: The primary tumour was identified in 59 of 69 patients. The median postoperative survival after surgery for MSCC was 20 months. Patients with prostate cancer had the longest median survival (6 years), and patients who were defined as having cancer of unknown primary tumour had the shortest median survival (3.5 months). Surgery maintained and improved the ability to walk in these patients. Study II: A total of 106 of 110 patients met the SINS criteria for potential instability or instability. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall risk of death between the SINS potentially unstable and unstable SINS categories, or in the risk of loss of ambulation one month after surgery. Study III: The median postoperative survival was 71.5 months in patients with myeloma and 58.7 months in patients with lymphoma. The SINS was not related to postoperative survival or neurological outcomes. The ability to walk before surgery was strongly associated with the postoperative ambulatory status. On multivariate Cox regression analysis, the ability to walk and a higher blood haemoglobin level prior to surgery were associated with superior survival. Study IV: A myeloma-like radiological appearance of prostate cancer spinal bone metastases was associated with poor survival and neurological outcomes after surgery for MSCC. Conclusions: Patients with MSCC as the IMM resemble a heterogeneous group in which survival is highly dependent on the type of primary tumour. A diagnostic workup is essential before a prognosis can be estimated in order to select candidates for surgery. The SINS may be helpful in selecting patients for surgery for MSCC, but it cannot be used to predict postoperative survival or neurological outcomes in patients with prostate cancer or in patients with haematological malignancies. A myeloma-like radiological appearance of prostate cancer spinal bone metastases is a strong negative predictor for survival and neurological outcomes after surgery for MSCC.
|
|
| 2. |
- MacDowall, Anna, 1976-
(författare)
-
Cervical Radiculopathy : Studies on Pain Analysis and Treatment
- 2018
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Knowledge about how to interpret pain-analyzing tools such as the pain drawing test and the visual analog scale (VAS) in cervical spine patients are sparse; hence, they have never been validated for this subgroup of patients. The method of artificial disc replacement (ADR) has been developed as an alternative treatment to fusion surgery after decompression for cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) with radiculopathy. Preserved motion of ADR devices aims to prevent immobilization side effects such as stiffness, dysphagia and adjacent segment pathology. Long-term follow-ups of these devices compared with the gold standard treatment are needed to create future guidelines.Objectives: This thesis aims at (1) validating the pain drawing as an investigational tool for the cervical spine, (2) validating the VAS for the cervical spine regarding the measurement noise and the minimum clinically important difference (MCID), (3) comparing ADR with fusion surgery at 5-years of follow-up regarding outcome and complications in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) as well as in the Swedish spine (Swespine) registry, and (4) investigating possible predictors to outcome after surgical treatment of cervical radiculopathy.Methods: An RCT with 153 patients undergoing surgery for cervical radiculopathy was performed. Baseline data, the Neck disability index (NDI), two sets of VAS-neck and VAS-arm scores, the EQ-5D, Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), Dysphagia short questionnaire and a pain drawing test were gathered preoperatively and after 5 years. Radiographs in flexion/extension and MRIs were done preoperatively and at follow-up. All patients registered in Swespine since January 1st, 2006 with cervical DDD and radiculopathy treated with ADR or fusion surgery, were included. Baseline data, the NDI, EQ-5D, and VAS-neck and VAS-arm scores were analyzed at 1, 2, 5 and 10-years of follow-up as well as the information regarding secondary surgeries.Results: Pain drawings interpreted with the simple body region method showed good inter-rater reliability in cervical spine patients. Markings in the upper arm region on the pain drawing predicted surgical treatment outcome and markings in the head region predicted depression. The measurement noise was ~10 mm and the MCID was ~20 mm on a 100 mm pain VAS. In both the RCT and Swespine register the outcome after ADR surgery were comparable with fusion at 5 years of follow-up, except for an elevated risk regarding secondary surgery on the index level in the ADR group. Fifty percent of the patients in the RCT, allocated to ADR surgery had preserved motion of less than 5°, at the 5-year follow-up, and 25%, mostly men were spontaneously fused. Preserved motion did not prevent adjacent segment pathology. High values of preoperative HADS scores were negative predictors of outcome.Conclusions: In patients with cervical DDD and radiculopathy both the pain drawing test and the VAS are validated tools to interpret the patients’ pain. Preoperative mental distress affects long-term outcome much more than the allocated treatment, ADR or fusion surgery in patients with cervical radiculopathy.Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN, registration number: 44347115.
|
|
| 3. |
- Försth, Peter, 1966-
(författare)
-
On Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
- 2015
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The incidence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is steadily rising, mostly because of a noticeably older age structure. In Sweden, LSS surgery has increased continuously over the years and is presently the most common argument to undergo spine surgery. The purpose of the surgery is to decompress the neural elements in the stenotic spinal canal. To avoid instability, there has been a tradition to do the decompression with a complementary fusion, especially if degenerative spondylolisthesis is present preoperatively.The overall aims of this thesis were to evaluate which method of surgery that generally can be considered to give sufficiently good clinical results with least cost to society and risk of complications and to determine whether there is a difference in outcome between smokers and non-smokers.The Swespine Register was used to collect data on clinical outcome after LSS surgery. In two of the studies, large cohorts were observed prospectively with follow-up after 2 years. Data were analysed in a multivariate model and logistic regression. In a randomised controlled trial (RCT, the Swedish Spinal Stenosis Study), 233 patients were randomised to either decompression with fusion or decompression alone and then followed for 2 years. The consequence of preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis on the results was analysed and a health economic evaluation performed. The three-dimensional CT technique was used in a radiologic biomechanical pilot study to evaluate the stabilising role of the segmental midline structures in LSS with preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis by comparing laminectomy with bilateral laminotomies.Smokers, in comparison with non-smokers, showed less improvement after surgery for LSS. Decompression with fusion did not lead to better results compared with decompression alone, no matter if degenerative spondylolisthesis was present preoperatively or not; nor was decompression with fusion found to be more cost-effective than decomression alone. The instability caused by a decompression proved to be minimal and removal of the midline structures by laminectomy did not result in increased instability compared with the preservation of these structures by bilateral laminotomies.In LSS surgery, decompression without fusion should generally be the treatment of choice, regardless of whether preoperative degenerative spondylolisthesis is present or not. Special efforts should be targeted towards smoking cessation prior to surgery.
|
|
