| 1. |
- Burdess, Anne, et al.
(författare)
-
Early Experience With a Novel Dissection-Specific Stent-Graft to Prevent Distal Stent-Graft-Induced New Entry Tears After Thoracic Endovascular Repair of Chronic Type B Aortic Dissections
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Vascular Surgery. - : Elsevier. - 0890-5096 .- 1615-5947. ; 81, s. 36-47
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The aim was to report short and mid-term outcomes of a novel, investigational, dissection-specific stent-graft (DSSG), specifically designed to address the features of chronic type B aortic dissection (CTBAD) and reduce the risk of distal stent-graft-induced new entry tears (dSINE).Materials and Methods: A retrospective single center cohort study of all patients undergoing TEVAR with the DSSG for CTBAD from January 1, 2017 to January 31, 2020. The DSSG, which is a modified stent-graft based on the Cook Zenith Alpha Thoracic platform, has no proximal barbs, and a customized longer body length with substantial taper. The second and third distal Z-stents are sited internally to avoid any contact of the metal skeleton with the dissection membrane and have reduced radial force, while the most distal stent was removed creating a distal 30 mm unsupported Dacron graft.Results: Sixteen patients (13 males, 3 females) with a median age of 66 years (range 31–79 years) underwent elective TEVAR of CTBAD using the DSSG. Six patients (38%) had an underlying connective tissue disorder. The median tapering was 10 mm (range 4 mm–21 mm) and median length 270 mm (range 210–380 mm). Technical success was achieved in all but one case (96%). One patient died within 30 days, due to retrograde type A dissection with cardiac tamponade. The 30-day rate of stroke, spinal cord ischemia, and re-interventions was 0%. After median imaging follow-up time of 17 months (range 1–31 months), one patient developed a dSINE 4 months after the index procedure. After median survival follow-up of 23 months (range 2–35 months), one late death occurred due to traumatic brain injury, while no aortic-related death occurred during follow-up. Complete false lumen (FL) thrombosis was achieved in 9 patients while the remaining 6 showed partial FL thrombosis. No instances of diameter increase at the level oftreated aortic segment were noted with serial measurements showing either stable (n = 7) or decreased (n = 8) maximal transverse diameter.Conclusions: Use of a novel DSSG with low radial force for TEVAR in the setting of CTBAD is safe and feasible. This early real-world experience shows promising mid-term effectiveness with low rates of dSINE or unplanned re-interventions and satisfactory aortic remodeling during follow-up. Longer follow-up is needed, however, before any firm conclusions can be drawn.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Burdess, Anne, et al.
(författare)
-
Stent-graft induced new entry tears after type B aortic dissection : how to treat and how to prevent?
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery. - : EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA. - 0021-9509 .- 1827-191X. ; 59:6, s. 789-796
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Progress of aortic disease after stent-graft treatment of aortic dissection includes the risk of stent graft-induced new entry (SINE). In this paper we review the incidence and mechanisms thought to be responsible for retrograde ascending and distal SINE after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B dissection, and examine potential techniques for treatment and prevention. Although the risk of proximal SINE is low, the fatality of this complication requires vigilance in patients who develop new onset symptoms in the early period after TEVAR treatment. Careful technique, minimal oversizing, and use of disease specific stent grafts may reduce the risk for proximal SINE. Distally, SINE is more frequently seen during follow-up in patients treated for chronic dissection. The most important risk factor is oversizing of the stent-graft compared to the true lumen distal landing zone. Development of new disease specific stent grafts with reduced distal radial force may reduce the risk for distal SINE.
|
|
| 5. |
- Olsson, Karl Wilhelm, 1985-, et al.
(författare)
-
Outcomes after endovascular aortic intervention in patients with connective tissue disease
- 2023
-
Ingår i: JAMA Surgery. - : American Medical Association (AMA). - 2168-6254 .- 2168-6262. ; 158:8, s. 832-839
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Importance: Endovascular treatment is not recommended for aortic pathologies in patients with connective tissue diseases (CTDs) other than in redo operations and as bridging procedures in emergencies. However, recent developments in endovascular technology may challenge this dogma.Objective: To assess the midterm outcomes of endovascular aortic repair in patients with CTD.Design, Setting, and Participants: For this descriptive retrospective study, data on demographics, interventions, and short-term and midterm outcomes were collected from 18 aortic centers in Europe, Asia, North America, and New Zealand. Patients with CTD who had undergone endovascular aortic repair from 2005 to 2020 were included. Data were analyzed from December 2021 to November 2022.Exposure: All principal endovascular aortic repairs, including redo surgery and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta.Main Outcomes and Measures: Short-term and midterm survival, rates of secondary procedures, and conversion to open repair.Results: In total, 171 patients were included: 142 with Marfan syndrome, 17 with Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 12 with vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (vEDS). Median (IQR) age was 49.9 years (37.9-59.0), and 107 patients (62.6%) were male. One hundred fifty-two (88.9%) were treated for aortic dissections and 19 (11.1%) for degenerative aneurysms. One hundred thirty-six patients (79.5%) had undergone open aortic surgery before the index endovascular repair. In 74 patients (43.3%), arch and/or visceral branches were included in the repair. Primary technical success was achieved in 168 patients (98.2%), and 30-day mortality was 2.9% (5 patients). Survival at 1 and 5 years was 96.2% and 80.6% for Marfan syndrome, 93.8% and 85.2% for Loeys-Dietz syndrome, and 75.0% and 43.8% for vEDS, respectively. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 4.7 years (1.9-9.2), 91 patients (53.2%) had undergone secondary procedures, of which 14 (8.2%) were open conversions.Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that endovascular aortic interventions, including redo procedures and complex repairs of the aortic arch and visceral aorta, in patients with CTD had a high rate of early technical success, low perioperative mortality, and a midterm survival rate comparable with reports of open aortic surgery in patients with CTD. The rate of secondary procedures was high, but few patients required conversion to open repair. Improvements in devices and techniques, as well as ongoing follow-up, may result in endovascular treatment for patients with CTD being included in guideline recommendations.
|
|
