| 1. |
-
Forward! – Bперёд! – Framåt! : Essays in Honour of Prof Dr Kaj Hobér
- 2019
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- In August 2019 our dear friend and colleague Professor Dr Kaj Hobér retired from his position as a Professor of International Investment and Trade Law at the Faculty of Law at Uppsala University. In order to honor Kaj Hobér’s long time commitment to academia and his successful career as a lawyer and partner of Mannheimer Swartling, a group of friends and colleagues have come together to present a collection of essays in his honor.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bylander, Eric, Professor, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Case Study 11: The German Office Furniture (EOPP)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Casebook on European Order for Payment Procedure and European Small Claims Procedure. - Maribor : University of Maribor, University Press. - 9789612866013 ; , s. 57-68
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- This Casebook is the outcome of the Train 2 En4CE project, co-funded by the EU’s Justice Program (Grant agreement no. 854038). The project conducted during 30 months, analysed available EU instruments for cross-border debt collection of civil claims in the EU, mainly focused on the EU Regulations creating euro-autonomous procedures: Regulation No. 1896/2006 of December 12, 2006, establishing a European order for payment procedure, as amended by Regulation No. 2017/1260, and Regulation No. 861/2007 of July 11, 2007, establishing a European small claims procedure, as amended by Regulation 2017/1259.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bylander, Eric, Professor, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Case Study 12: The Closed Gates of the Garden of Edén (EOPP)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Casebook on European Order for Payment Procedure and European Small Claims Procedure. - Maribor : University of Maribor, University Press. - 9789612866013 ; , s. 69-73
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- This Casebook is the outcome of the Train 2 En4CE project, co-funded by the EU’s Justice Program (Grant agreement no. 854038). The project conducted during 30 months, analysed available EU instruments for cross-border debt collection of civil claims in the EU, mainly focused on the EU Regulations creating euro-autonomous procedures: Regulation No. 1896/2006 of December 12, 2006, establishing a European order for payment procedure, as amended by Regulation No. 2017/1260, and Regulation No. 861/2007 of July 11, 2007, establishing a European small claims procedure, as amended by Regulation 2017/1259.
|
|
| 4. |
- Bylander, Eric, Professor, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Case Study 16: A Swedish Artist in Germany (ESCP)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Casebook on European Order for Payment Procedure and European Small Claims Procedure. - Maribor : University of Maribor, University Press. - 9789612866013 ; , s. 91-100
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- This Casebook is the outcome of the Train 2 En4CE project, co-funded by the EU’s Justice Program (Grant agreement no. 854038). The project conducted during 30 months, analysed available EU instruments for cross-border debt collection of civil claims in the EU, mainly focused on the EU Regulations creating euro-autonomous procedures: Regulation No. 1896/2006 of December 12, 2006, establishing a European order for payment procedure, as amended by Regulation No. 2017/1260, and Regulation No. 861/2007 of July 11, 2007, establishing a European small claims procedure, as amended by Regulation 2017/1259.
|
|
| 5. |
- Bylander, Eric, Professor, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
Case Study 37: Surfers in Paradise (ESCP)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Casebook on European Order for Payment Procedure and European Small Claims Procedure. - Maribor : University of Maribor, University Press. - 9789612866013 ; , s. 211-219
-
Bokkapitel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- This Casebook is the outcome of the Train 2 En4CE project, co-funded by the EU’s Justice Program (Grant agreement no. 854038). The project conducted during 30 months, analysed available EU instruments for cross-border debt collection of civil claims in the EU, mainly focused on the EU Regulations creating euro-autonomous procedures: Regulation No. 1896/2006 of December 12, 2006, establishing a European order for payment procedure, as amended by Regulation No. 2017/1260, and Regulation No. 861/2007 of July 11, 2007, establishing a European small claims procedure, as amended by Regulation 2017/1259.
|
|
| 6. |
- Bylander, Eric, Professor, 1973-
(författare)
-
Den datoriserade domaren
- 2018
-
Annan publikation (populärvet., debatt m.m.)abstract
- Processrätten är den del av juridiken som har starkast inriktning på hur rättegångar och andra förfaranden i domstol skall gå till. Min forskning inom detta rättsområde har särskilt behandlat frågor med koppling till lagreformen En modernare rättegång. Inspirerad av retoriken har jag, främst i min avhandling, studerat valet mellan muntlighet och skriftlighet i ljuset av såväl modern teknik som rättshistoriska erfarenheter.De senaste åren har jag fokuserat på de högre domstolarnas prövningstillståndsprövning, alltså den förenklade bedömning som avgör om ett överklagat avgörande skall överprövas eller inte. Gemensamt för många av mina processrättsliga forskningsinsatser är att de berör ofta förekommande situationer av stor praktisk betydelse för domstolarnas funktionssätt. Ett återkommande tema är enskildas upplevelse av en rättvis domstolsbehandling.
|
|
| 7. |
- Bylander, Eric, Professor, 1973-
(författare)
-
Den datoriserade domaren
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Svensk Juristtidning. - 0039-6591. ; :1, s. 1-7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Artificiell intelligens (AI) kan uppfattas som ett hot mot framtiden för domarna och domstolarna. I den professorsinstallationsföreläsning som här återges i skriftlig form konstateras att frågan om vi bör ersätta den mänskliga domaren med en dömande maskin reser fundamentala frågor om domarrollen och dömandets natur. Till belysning av vad som kan tänkas vara möjligt och lämpligt lämnas en beskrivning av vägen fram till dagens teknikanvändning i de svenska domstolarna. Distinktionen mellan juridiken betraktad som å ena sidan en konst och å andra sidan en teknik identifieras som betydelsefull för studier av om det finns något unikt mänskligt i uppgiften att vara domare i domstol och vad detta i så fall kan tänkas bestå i.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Bylander, Eric, 1973-
(författare)
-
Muntlighetsprincipen : En rättsvetenskaplig studie av processuella handläggningsformer i svensk rätt
- 2006
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This doctoral thesis examines the different forms of procedural communication available to the Swedish courts. The choice traditionally stood between oral and written procedure. Today the procedure in the general courts is dominated by the principle of orality, while in the administrative courts, procedure chiefly takes the written form. This being said, the types of communication procedures used in courts today are constantly changing, the reason being, in part, the advent and advancement of new communication tools such as telephone, video and the internet.The cardinal aspiration for this doctoral thesis has been to prepare a generous substructure that will allow an assessment of how the principles that constitute the foundation for the choice of a form of procedural communication stand up against the arrival of new conditions. In attaining this goal the thesis takes stock of, structure, and evaluate the current knowledge of the regulation of the forms of procedural communication and the arguments that have been put forward regarding its design and application.The chosen method is a rhetorical-topical audit of the arguments provided by the legislative community. In addition it examines the relationship between these arguments and the activities of the courts and includes a comparative analysis of the current and historic conditions of the procedural communication forms.In the thesis nine different principle topoi (argument sources) for the analysed argumentation are identified and discussed: The Purpose of the Proceedings, Security, Speed, Cost-effectiveness, the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the Decision-making, the Parties, Publicity and the Rules and Regulations.
|
|
