| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Caffyn, Alison, et al.
(författare)
-
Rural Proofing for Local Authorities
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Local Governance. ; 28:4, s. 273-286
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Theconcept of rural proofing, identified by the Government in its Rural WhitePaper, involves identifying whether new or existing policies will havedifferential impacts in rural areas and considering adjustments orcompensations to address these. The article examines how local authorities canput rural proofing into practice at the local level. Based on researchundertaken for the Countryside Agency, it considers how local authority policyand decision making processes can lend themselves to rural proofing andmitigate differential impacts in rural areas. A localised rural proofingchecklist is drawn up and a range of issues associated with implementing such amechanism are debated. Conclusions are drawn as to how local authorities cantake rural proofing forward.
|
|
| 4. |
- Caffyn, Alison, et al.
(författare)
-
Urban-Rural Interdependencies: Joining up Policy in Practice
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Regional studies. - Florence, Kentucky : Routledge. - 0034-3404 .- 1360-0591. ; 39:3, s. 283-296
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- 'Urban' and 'rural' are commonly used in an oppositional fashion. Authorities and agencies have similarly developed policies for development and regeneration in Britain with little cress-referencing. This paper argues that there are benefits to be gained by taking an integrated urban-rural approach to regional development and by focusing on interdependencies and commonalities rather than on differences. Policy documents at the European, national and regional levels are increasingly stressing interdependencies and the move towards regionalization adds to the shift in emphasis towards functional regions rather than to town and country. The paper reports primary research in England into the scale and scope of joint urban-rural collaboration in practice.
|
|
