| 1. |
- Brand, Judith S, et al.
(författare)
-
Infection-related hospitalizations in breast cancer patients : risk and impact on prognosis
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Infection. - Stockholm : Karolinska Institutet, Dept of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. - 0163-4453 .- 1532-2742.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: Infections are a common cause of hospitalization in breast cancer patients. We studied the risk, clinical characteristics and outcomes of infection-related hospitalizations in this patient population. METHODS: A Swedish registry-based study including 8338 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2008, followed prospectively for infection-related hospitalizations until 2010. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated using background rates from the general female population. Associations with clinical characteristics and mortality were analyzed using flexible parametric survival models. RESULTS: In total, 720 patients experienced an infection-related hospitalization during a median follow-up of 4.9 years. Infection rates were highest within the first year of diagnosis (SIR = 5.61, 95% CI; 4.98-6.32), and site-specific risks were most pronounced for sepsis (SIR = 3.14, 95% CI; 2.66-3.71) and skin infections (SIR = 2.80, 95% CI; 2.24-3.50). Older age at diagnosis, comorbidities, markers of tumor aggressiveness, chemotherapy and axillary node dissection were independent predictors of infectious disease risk. Infection-related hospitalizations were also independently associated with overall and breast cancer-specific death. CONCLUSIONS: A significant number of breast cancer patients are hospitalized with an infection following diagnosis, which in turn predicts poor prognosis. The risk profile of infection-related hospitalizations is multifactorial, including patient, tumor and treatment-related factors.
|
|
| 2. |
- Colzani, Edoardo
(författare)
-
Health outcomes of women with breast cancer
- 2014
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The overall survival of breast cancer patients has increased quite remarkably in the past decades in the developed countries due to substantial improvements in diagnosis and treatment. As a consequence, the proportion of women alive after a breast cancer diagnosis is currently increasing. It is therefore becoming of outmost importance to also focus on medium- and long-term health outcomes of women with breast cancer. Swedish population registers were used to study time-dependent survival of breast cancer patients according to age and tumor characteristics for the following health outcomes: causes of death, distant metastasis, risk of hospitalization due to a bone fracture, and risk of hospitalization due to an infection. Different survival analysis methodologies were applied including Cox regression models, Poisson regression models and flexible parametric survival models. Several measures were used to assess the outcomes of interest: rates, ratios and cumulative incidences. Comparisons with the general population using standardized incidence and mortality ratios were also performed. The risk of dying from breast cancer varied by age, and by tumor characteristics in a time-dependent fashion. Circulatory system disorders were an important cause of death in our study population, in particular among women diagnosed with breast cancer after the age of 60 years. The risk of distant metastasis was still non-negligible after five years from breast cancer diagnosis in most subgroups of patients. Women with breast cancer were at increased risk of being hospitalized with a bone fracture or with an infection for at least ten years since diagnosis. The risk of hospitalization due to an infection was particularly increased for skin infections and sepsis. Women with breast cancer were also at significantly increased risk of dying after being hospitalized with a bone fracture or an infection. Lymph node status at breast cancer diagnosis was not only found to be an important long-term predictor of overall and disease-free survival, but also of risk of hospitalization due to bone fracture or infection. Women with estrogen receptors-negative breast tumors showed a worse overall prognosis as compared with patients with estrogen receptors-positive breast tumors only in the first five years after diagnosis. Estrogen-receptor positive tumors carried a low but persistent risk of distant recurrence and death. A breast tumor size of more than 20mm at diagnosis was mainly associated with a worse short-term prognosis, however a mild significant association was detectable for more than five years from diagnosis. In conclusion, there is no evidence to support discontinuation of clinical follow-up in breast cancer patients. Further investigation on more targeted approaches for different subgroups should be considered and more attention to medical conditions not directly related to breast cancer would be probably beneficial for these women. Preventive measures for bone fractures and infections could be taken into more consideration for all breast cancer patients at increased risk.
|
|
| 3. |
- Colzani, Edoardo, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of hospitalization and death due to bone fractures after breast cancer: a registry-based cohort study
- 2016
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - Stockholm : Karolinska Institutet, Dept of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. - 0007-0920 .- 1532-1827.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Bone fractures may have an impact on prognosis of breast cancer. The long-term risks of bone fracture in breast cancer patients have not been thoroughly studied. METHODS: Poisson regression was used to investigate the incidence of hospitalisation due to bone fracture comparing women with and without breast cancer based on Swedish National registers. Cox regression was used to investigate the risk of being hospitalised with bone fracture, and subsequent risk of death, in a regional cohort of breast cancer patients. RESULTS: For breast cancer patients, the 5-year risk of bone fracture hospitalisation was 4.8% and the 30-day risk of death following a bone fracture hospitalisation was 2.0%. Compared with the general population, breast cancer patients had incidence rate ratios of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.23-1.28) and 1.18 (95% CI: 1.14-1.22) for hospitalisation due to any bone fracture and hip fracture, respectively. These ratios remained significantly increased for 10 years. Comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index 1) were associated with the risk of being hospitalised with bone fracture. Women taking aromatase inhibitors were at an increased risk as compared with women taking tamoxifen (HR=1.48; 95% CI: 0.98-2.22). Breast cancer patients hospitalised for a bone fracture showed a higher risk of death (HR=1.83; 95% CI: 1.50-2.22) compared with those without bone fracture. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a previous breast cancer diagnosis are at an increased risk of hospitalisation due to a bone fracture, particularly if they have other comorbidities.
|
|
| 4. |
- Giorgi Rossi, Paolo, et al.
(författare)
-
Recommendations from the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer for multigene testing to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer, hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative
- 2021
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Cancer. - : Springer. - 0007-0920 .- 1532-1827. ; 124:9, s. 1503-1512
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Predicting the risk of recurrence and response to chemotherapy in women with early breast cancer is crucial to optimise adjuvant treatment. Despite the common practice of using multigene tests to predict recurrence, existing recommendations are inconsistent. Our aim was to formulate healthcare recommendations for the question “Should multigene tests be used in women who have early invasive breast cancer, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, to guide the use of adjuvant chemotherapy?”Methods: The European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer (ECIBC) Guidelines Development Group (GDG), a multidisciplinary guideline panel including experts and three patients, developed recommendations informed by systematic reviews of the evidence. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used. Four multigene tests were evaluated: the 21-gene recurrence score (21-RS), the 70-gene signature (70-GS), the PAM50 risk of recurrence score (PAM50-RORS), and the 12-gene molecular score (12-MS).Results: Five studies (2 marker-based design RCTs, two treatment interaction design RCTs and 1 pooled individual data analysis from observational studies) were included; no eligible studies on PAM50-RORS or 12-MS were identified and the GDG did not formulate recommendations for these tests.Conclusions: The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 21-RS for lymph node-negative women (conditional recommendation, very low certainty of evidence), recognising that benefits are probably larger in women at high risk of recurrence based on clinical characteristics. The ECIBC GDG suggests the use of the 70-GS for women at high clinical risk (conditional recommendation, low certainty of evidence), and recommends not using 70-GS in women at low clinical risk (strong recommendation, low certainty of evidence).
|
|
| 5. |
- Schunemann, Holger J., et al.
(författare)
-
Methods for Development of the European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer Guidelines Recommendations in the Era of Guideline Transparency
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Annals of Internal Medicine. - : American College of Physicians. - 0003-4819 .- 1539-3704. ; 171:4, s. 273-280
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Neither breast cancer prevention and early-detection programs, nor their outcomes, are uniform across Europe. This article describes the rationale, methods, and process for development of the European Commission ( EC) Initiative on Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis Guidelines. To be consistent with standards set by the Institute of Medicine and others, the EC followed 6 general principles. First, the EC selected, via an open call, a panel with broad representation of areas of expertise. Second, it ensured that all recommendations were supported by systematic reviews. Third, the EC separately considered important subgroups of women, included patient advocates in the guidelines development group, and focused on good communication to inform women's decisions. Fourth, EC rules on conflicts of interest were followed and the GRADE ( Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) Evidence to Decision frameworks were used to structure the process and minimize the influence of competing interests. Fifth, it focused its recommendations on outcomes that matter to women, and certainty of the evidence is rated for each. Sixth, the EC elicited stakeholder feedback to ensure that the recommendations remain up to date and relevant to practice. This article describes the approach and highlights ways of disseminating and adapting the recommendations both within and outside Europe, using innovative information technology tools.
|
|
