1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
- Brown, Sally, et al.
(författare)
-
Shifting perspectives on coastal impacts and adaptation
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Nature Climate Change. - : Nature Publishing Group. - 1758-678X .- 1758-6798. ; 4:9, s. 752-755
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports reflect evolving attitudes in adapting to sea-level rise by taking a systems approach and recognizing that multiple responses exist to achieve a less hazardous coast.
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
- Seitzinger, Sybil P., et al.
(författare)
-
Planetary Stewardship in an Urbanizing World : Beyond City Limits
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Ambio. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0044-7447 .- 1654-7209. ; 41:8, s. 787-794
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cities are rapidly increasing in importance as a major factor shaping the Earth system, and therefore, must take corresponding responsibility. With currently over half the world's population, cities are supported by resources originating from primarily rural regions often located around the world far distant from the urban loci of use. The sustainability of a city can no longer be considered in isolation from the sustainability of human and natural resources it uses from proximal or distant regions, or the combined resource use and impacts of cities globally. The world's multiple and complex environmental and social challenges require interconnected solutions and coordinated governance approaches to planetary stewardship. We suggest that a key component of planetary stewardship is a global system of cities that develop sustainable processes and policies in concert with its non-urban areas. The potential for cities to cooperate as a system and with rural connectivity could increase their capacity to effect change and foster stewardship at the planetary scale and also increase their resource security.
|
|
6. |
- Dearing, John A., et al.
(författare)
-
Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Global Environmental Change. - : Elsevier BV. - 0959-3780 .- 1872-9495. ; 28, s. 227-238
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Humanity faces a major global challenge in achieving wellbeing for all, while simultaneously ensuring that the biophysical processes and ecosystem services that underpin wellbeing are exploited within scientifically informed boundaries of sustainability. We propose a framework for defining the safe and just operating space for humanity that integrates social wellbeing into the original planetary boundaries concept (Rockstrom et al., 2009a,b) for application at regional scales. We argue that such a framework can: (1) increase the policy impact of the boundaries concept as most governance takes place at the regional rather than planetary scale; (2) contribute to the understanding and dissemination of complexity thinking throughout governance and policy-making; (3) act as a powerful metaphor and communication tool for regional equity and sustainability. We demonstrate the approach in two rural Chinese localities where we define the safe and just operating space that lies between an environmental ceiling and a social foundation from analysis of time series drawn from monitored and palaeoecological data, and from social survey statistics respectively. Agricultural intensification has led to poverty reduction, though not eradicated it, but at the expense of environmental degradation. Currently, the environmental ceiling is exceeded for degraded water quality at both localities even though the least well-met social standards are for available piped water and sanitation. The conjunction of these social needs and environmental constraints around the issue of water access and quality illustrates the broader value of the safe and just operating space approach for sustainable development.
|
|
7. |
- Dearing, JA, et al.
(författare)
-
Social-ecological systems in the Anthropocene : The need for integrating social and biophysical records at regional scales.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: The Anthropocene Review. - : SAGE Publications. - 2053-0196 .- 2053-020X. ; 2:3, s. 220-246
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Understanding social-ecological system dynamics is a major research priority for sustainable management of landscapes, ecosystems and resources. But the lack of multi-decadal records represents an important gap in information that hinders the development of the research agenda. Without improved information on the long-term and complex interactions between causal factors and responses, it will be difficult to answer key questions about trends, rates of change, tipping points, safe operating spaces and pre-impact conditions. Where available long-term monitored records are too short or lacking, palaeoenvironmental sciences may provide continuous multi-decadal records for an array of ecosystem states, processes and services. Combining these records with conventional sources of historical information from instrumental monitoring records, official statistics and enumerations, remote sensing, archival documents, cartography and archaeology produces an evolutionary framework for reconstructing integrated regional histories. We demonstrate the integrated approach with published case studies from Australia, China, Europe and North America.
|
|
8. |
- Sörlin, Sverker, et al.
(författare)
-
Toward an Integrated History to Guide the Future
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Ecology and Society. - 1708-3087. ; 16:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Many contemporary societal challenges manifest themselves in the domain of human–environment interactions.There is a growing recognition that responses to these challenges formulated within current disciplinary boundaries, in isolationfrom their wider contexts, cannot adequately address them. Here, we outline the need for an integrated, transdisciplinary synthesisthat allows for a holistic approach, and, above all, a much longer time perspective. We outline both the need for and thefundamental characteristics of what we call “integrated history.” This approach promises to yield new understandings of therelationship between the past, present, and possible futures of our integrated human–environment system. We recommend aunique new focus of our historical efforts on the future, rather than the past, concentrated on learning about future possibilitiesfrom history. A growing worldwide community of transdisciplinary scholars is forming around building this Integrated Historyand future of People on Earth (IHOPE). Building integrated models of past human societies and their interactions with theirenvironments yields new insights into those interactions and can help to create a more sustainable and desirable future. Theactivity has become a major focus within the global change community.
|
|