| 1. |
- Apel, Jan, et al.
(författare)
-
Istidsjägare i Uppåkra
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Fornvännen. - Stockholm : Kungl. Vitterhets Historie och Antikvitets Akademien. - 0015-7813 .- 1404-9430. ; 114:1, s. 47-51
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Berggren, Åsa, et al.
(författare)
-
Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük : integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Antiquity. - : Antiquity Publications. - 0003-598X .- 1745-1744. ; 89:344, s. 433-448
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this paper is to summarize progress in the development of reflexive methods at Çatalhöyük over the past 20 years, and to describe some recent innovations that have used digital and 3D technologies to enhance the original reflexive aims. While digital technologies were not at the forefront of the methods described in an initial account of reflexive methods published in Antiquity (Hodder 1997), it has become clear that many of the original aims can be enhanced by the use of new generations of computer assisted technologies for visualization, recording and planning. The paper does not describe the full use of digital technologies at Çatalhöyük; for example laser scanning is being used as part of the documentation for conservation evaluation. The wider use of digital technologies is discussed by Forte et al (2012); the aim in this paper is to discuss those aspects of digital technologies that relate to the reflexive aims of the project, thereby adding to the continuing discussion on reflexive archaeological practice (see Bender et al. 2007; Berggren 2001; Berggren & Hodder 2003; M. Carver 2011; G. Carver 2011; Castaneda 2008; Chadwick 2003; Edgeworth 2006; Hodder 2003; Silliman 2008; Yarrow 2003).
|
|
| 6. |
- Bezzi, Luca, et al.
(författare)
-
Rilievo tridimensionale di reperti archeologici : tecniche a confronto
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Archeofoss : open source, free software e open format nei processi di ricerca archeologica. atti del VI Workshop, Napoli, 9-10 giugno 2011 - open source, free software e open format nei processi di ricerca archeologica. atti del VI Workshop, Napoli, 9-10 giugno 2011. - 9788874780327 ; 13, s. 141-152
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- This contribution is intended to present the results of some comparative tests between different techniques for tridimensional digital documentation, applied to archaeological finds. Both open source and proprietary solutions have been analyzed, investigating pros and cons of their approach and considering the characteristics of hardware and software components from an archaeological point of view. Our attentions was especially focused on Computer Vision applications (mainly based on software) with a comparison of Microsoft’s product Photosynth with the GPL licensed Bundler. Another point of interest (hardware side) has been the investigation on optic sensors, which took us to concentrate on the triangolation laserscan Next Engine (proprietary) and on the structured light Three Phase Scan (open source).
|
|
| 7. |
- Buckland, Philip I., Dr. 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
To tree, or not to tree? On the Empirical Basis for Having Past Landscapes to Experience
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Digital Humanities Quarterly. - : The Alliance of Digital Humanities Organizations (ADHO). - 1938-4122. ; 12:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This article provides an overview of some of the complex issues involved in reconstructing and visualizing past landscapes. It discusses the importance of empirical data and introduces some of the terminology necessary for understanding methods which are often considered more in the domain of the natural sciences than humanities. Current methods and practices are put in the context of environmental archaeology, archaeological theory and heritage management as well as related, briefly, to the broader context of archaeological theory, practice and research data infrastructure. Finally, some examples and pointers for the future are given in the hope that the article may provide a point of reference for those looking to gain an entry point into the study of past landscapes, and understand their relevance in archaeological visualisation.
|
|
| 8. |
- Börjesson, Lisa, et al.
(författare)
-
A Neo-Documentalist Lens for Exploring the Premises of Disciplinary Knowledge Making
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Proceedings from the Document Academy. - 2376-8908. ; 3:1, s. 1-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article applies a neo-documentalist approach to explore disciplinary documentation and document practices, assumed to condition disciplinary knowledge-making. The aim is to show how conceptions and materialities of what counts as documentation and documents are intertwined with changing and persisting disciplinary and sub-disciplinary practices of producing information and knowledge, of knowing, and informing. A collective, multivocal autoethnographic method is used to obtain vignettes from five areas of activity in or related to archaeology. The ongoing digitization of archaeological investigation and documentation methods, and of archaeological materials, is used as a shared departure point in the vignettes, explaining how digitization influences documents in each area of archaeology. The vignettes illustrate a multitude of conceptions and materialities of documentation and reveal frictions, both within and between sub-disciplinary areas. In light of the exploration of documentation practices in archaeology, we posit that a neo-documentalist perspective functions as a useful analytical tool for deconstructing habitual and canonical conceptions of documentation in disciplines and practices. The approach is especially powerful for pinpointing and explicating frictions between conceptions of documentation that can cause problems in information sharing and communication. We discuss the potential of the neo-documentalist approach as a practical tool to plan for and implement change in documentation and document practices.
|
|
| 9. |
- Börjesson, Lisa, et al.
(författare)
-
A neo-documentalist lens for exploring the premises of disciplinary knowledge making
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Proceedings from the annual meeting of the Document Academy. - 2376-8908. ; 3:1, s. 1-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article applies a neo-documentalist approach to explore disciplinary information and knowledge making practices. The aim is to show how conceptions and materialities of what counts as documentation and documents are intertwined with changing and persisting disciplinary and sub-disciplinary practices of producing information and knowledge, of knowing, and informing. A collective, multivocal autoethnographic method is used to obtain vignettes from five areas of activity in or related to the discipline archaeology. The ongoing digitization of archaeology is used as a shared point of departure in the vignettes, explaining how digitization influences documentation and documents in each area of archaeological practice. The vignettes illustrate a multitude of conceptions and materialities of documentation, and reveal frictions in-between, both between and within sub-disciplinary areas. In the light of the exploration of information and knowledge making practices in archaeology, we posit that a neo-documentalist perspective functions as a useful analytical tool for deconstructing canonical and habitual conceptions of documentation in disciplines and practices. The approach is especially powerful in pinpointing and explicating frictions between conceptions of documentation as potential sources of problems in information sharing. Moreover, we discuss the potential of the neo-documentalist approach as a practical tool to plan for and implement change in documents and documentation practices.
|
|
| 10. |
- Börjesson, Lisa, et al.
(författare)
-
A Neo-Documentalist Lens for Exploring the Premises of Disciplinary Knowledge Making
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Proceedings from the Document Academy. - 2473-215X. ; 3:1, s. 1-23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this article is to demonstrate how documentation analysis with a neo-documentalist lens can help us explore variations (and stabilities) in conceptions and materialities of documents, as intertwined with disciplinary and sub-disciplinary practices of informing and knowing. Drawing on documentation theory, and with previous research on archaeological documentation as a background, by means of autoethnographic vignettes we explore contemporary conceptions of documentation in five areas in or related to archaeology (Intra-site 3D documentation, Development-led archaeology, Aggregating documentation for use outside the organization, Mediating documentation – or documentation mediation, and Documenting and displaying archaeology in a changing environment). Digitization, and how digitization has spurred renegotiations of what counts as documentation, functions as a common denominator discussed in all of the vignettes. The analysis highlights simultaneously ongoing renegotiations of documentation serving each area’s unique epistemic purposes, and pushing document materialities in different directions. This operationalization of documentation analysis creates an understanding for intra-disciplinary variations in documentation but is importantly also a practical tool to uncover documentation-related premises of disciplinary knowledge-making. This tool can be applied for example in processes of information policy development (regulating what purposes documentation should serve, and what it should be like), information systems design (e.g. for creation and communication of documentation), and infrastructure development (e.g. for preservation and accessibility of documentation).
|
|
