| 1. |
- Desta, Liyew Awoke
(författare)
-
Heart failure after myocardial infarction : contemporary trends, determinants and prognostic implications : nationwide observational studies
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one of the leading causes of heart failure (HF). The overall aim of this thesis is to describe contemporary epidemiology of post myocardial infarction HF including temporal trends, changes in patient characteristics, its determinants and prognostic implications, as well as the long-term risk of HF admission. We also examined adherence patterns to beta-blocker treatment after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and subsequent implications on outcome using a nationwide myocardial infarction registry. The thesis includes four papers. The first paper described the incidence, temporal trends, and prognostic impact of HF complicating acute AMI. The second paper investigated the incidence, determinants and prognostic implications of HF with normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) that occurs in the setting of AMI. The third paper investigated the risk and predictors of HF admission among survivors of AMI. Finally, the fourth paper investigated the pattern of adherence to beta-blocker treatment in one-year AMI survivors, and assessed predictors of better adherence and subsequent implications on long-term all-cause mortality and/or HF admissions. The incidence of in-hospital HF during an index hospitalization for AMI decreased by 39% with an absolute risk reduction (ARR) of 18% over 13 years with more pronounced reduction among STEMI (ARR 22%) than NSTEMI (ARR 14%) patients, p<0.001. The use of rapid revascularization treatment and evidence-based pharmacologic treatment increased over the years (1996-1997 vs. 2008). Patients with clinical HF after AMI had a higher risk for death (adjusted HR: 2.09; 95% CI: 2.06 to 2.13). However, mortality was decreasing over time, showing the potential for a further decrease with even better treatment strategies. HF with normal EF was a relatively less common form of HF in the setting of AMI but its occurrence was associated with at least a 3-fold increase in mortality compared to patients with NEF and no HF. Interestingly, patients who had evidence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVEF <50%) without clinical HF had better long-term prognosis than patients with HFNEF, underscoring the importance of clinical findings such as pulmonary rales to predict higher risk of mortality complementary to EF. Long-term survivors of MI without a previous history of HF remain at risk of late-onset HF (LOHF) with in-hospital HF being a strong predictor. Out of 150,566 AMI survivors without prior HF, 19.4% (n=29,194) were readmitted due to HF during the study period (2004-2013). However, the incidence of LOHF after AMI showed a declining trend over the years which largely seems to be related to a decreasing burden of comorbidities and an improved evidence-based revascularization strategy and pharmacologic treatment. Out of 38,597 one-year AMI survivors, 31.1% were non-adherent to beta-blocker treatment one year after the index event. Patients with LVSD (REF) without signs of HF and patients with HFREF were more likely to receive beta-blockers at discharge and adhere to treatment one year after the index AMI. Better adherence was associated with improved long-term outcomes in all patients except in patients with HFNEF. Of note, the long-term prognostic advantage seen also in low-risk patients highlights the need for future studies. In conclusion, though gains have been made in AMI treatment, the lingering problem of HF underscores the importance of interventions at all levels that mitigate its occurrence starting from primordial preventive measures, early identification and treatment of risk factors, prompt and effective treatment of AMI and implementation of evidence-based secondary prevention therapies while ensuring the continuous monitoring of epidemiological trends.
|
|
| 2. |
- Desta, Liyew, et al.
(författare)
-
Adherence to beta-blockers and long-term risk of heart failure and mortality after a myocardial infarction
- 2021
-
Ingår i: ESC Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 2055-5822. ; 8:1, s. 344-355
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the association between adherence to beta-blocker treatment after a first acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and long-term risk of heart failure (HF) and death. Methods and results: All patients admitted for a first AMI included in the nationwide Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies register between 2005 and 2010 were eligible (n = 71 638). After exclusion of patients who died in-hospital, patients with previous HF, patients with unknown left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), and patients who died during the first year after the index event, 38 608 patients remained in the final analysis. Adherence to prescribed beta-blockers was determined for 1 year after the index event using the national registry for prescribed drugs and was measured as proportion of days covered, the ratio between the numbers of days covered by the dispensed prescriptions and number of days in the period. As customary, a threshold level for proportion of days covered ≥80% was used to classify patients as adherent or non-adherent. At discharge 90.6% (n = 36 869) of all patients were prescribed a beta-blocker. Among 38 608 1 year survivors, 31.1% (n = 12 013) were non-adherent to beta-blockers. Patients with reduced EF without HF and patients with HF with reduced EF were more likely to remain adherent to beta-blockers at 1 year compared with patients with normal EF (NEF) without HF. Being married/cohabiting and having higher income level, hypertension, ST-elevation MI, and percutaneous coronary intervention were associated with better adherence. Adherence was independently associated with lower all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71–0.84] and a lower risk for the composite of HF readmission/death, (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.89, P value <0.001) during the subsequent 4 years of follow up. These associations were favourable but less apparent in patients with HFNEF and NEF. Conclusions: Nearly one in three AMI patients was non-adherent to beta-blockers within the first year. Adherence was independently associated with improved long-term outcomes; however, uncertainty remains for patients with HFNEF and NEF.
|
|
| 3. |
- Desta, Liyew, et al.
(författare)
-
Transradial versus trans-femoral access site in high-speed rotational atherectomy in Sweden
- 2022
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0167-5273 .- 1874-1754. ; 352, s. 45-51
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Radial artery is the preferred access site in contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, limited data exist regarding utilization pattern, safety, and long-term efficacy of transradial artery access (TRA) PCI in heavily calcified lesions using high-speed rotational atherectomy (HSRA). Methods: All patients who underwent HSRA-PCI in Sweden between 2005 and 2016 were included. Outcomes were major adverse cardiac events (MACE, including death, myocardial infarction (MI) or target vessel revascularisation (TVR)), in-hospital bleeding and restenosis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for the non-randomized access site selection. Results: We included 1479 patients of whom 649 had TRA and 782 transfemoral artery access (TFA) HSRA-PCI. The rate of TRA increased significantly by 18% per year but remained lower in HSRA-PCI (60%) than in the overall PCI population (85%) in 2016. TRA was associated with comparable angiographic success but significantly lower risk for major (adjusted OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.05–0.47) or any in-hospital bleeding (adjusted OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.13–0.78). At one year, the adjusted risk for MACE (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.67–1.13) and its individual components did not differ between TRA and TFA patients. The risk for restenosis did not significantly differ between TRA and TFA HSRA-PCI treated lesions (adjusted HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.46–1.81). Conclusion: HSRA-PCI by TRA was associated with significantly lower risk for in-hospital bleeding and equivalent long-term efficacy when compared with TFA. Our data support the feasibility and superior safety profile of TRA in HSRA-PCI.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hamilton, Eleonora, et al.
(författare)
-
Prevalence and prognostic impact of left ventricular systolic dysfunction or pulmonary congestion after acute myocardial infarction.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: ESC heart failure. - : Wiley. - 2055-5822. ; 10:2, s. 1347-1357
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim was to describe the prevalence, characteristics, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) developing left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction or pulmonary congestion by applying different criteria to define the population.In patients with MI included in the Swedish web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease (SWEDEHEART) registry, four different sets of criteria were applied, creating four not mutually exclusive subsets of patients: patients with MI and ejection fraction (EF)<50% and/or pulmonary congestion (subset 1); EF<40% and/or pulmonary congestion (subset 2); EF<40% and/or pulmonary congestion and at least one high-risk feature (subset 3, PARADISE-MI like); and EF<50% and no diabetes mellitus (subset 4, DAPA-MI like). Subsets 1, 2, 3, and 4 constituted 31.6%, 15.0%, 12.8%, and 22.8% of all patients with MI (n=87177), respectively. The age and prevalence of different co-morbidities varied between subsets. For median age, 70 to 77, for diabetes mellitus, 22 to 33%; for chronic kidney disease, 22 to 38%, for prior MI, 17 to 21%, for atrial fibrillation, 7 to 14%, and for ST-elevations, 38 to 50%. The cumulative incidence of death or heart failure hospitalization at 3years was 17.4% (95% CI: 17.1-17.7%) in all MIs; 26.9% (26.3-27.4%) in subset 1; 37.6% (36.7-38.5%) in subset 2; 41.8% (40.7-42.8%) in subset 3; and 22.6% (22.0-23.2%) in subset 4.Depending on the definition, LV systolic dysfunction or pulmonary congestion is present in 13-32% of all patients with MI and is associated with a two to three times higher risk of subsequent death or HF admission. There is a need to optimize management and improve outcomes for this high-risk population.
|
|
| 5. |
- Khedri, Masih, et al.
(författare)
-
Statin Treatment Intensity, Discontinuation, and Long-Term Outcome in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Impaired Kidney Function
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0160-2446 .- 1533-4023. ; 81:6, s. 400-410
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Statin dosage in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and concomitant kidney dysfunction is a clinical dilemma. We studied discontinuation during the first year after an AMI and long-term outcome in patients receiving high versus low–moderate intensity statin treatment, in relation to kidney function. For the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT-A), we included all patients admitted to Swedish coronary care units for a first AMI between 2005 and 2016 that survived in-hospital, had known creatinine, and initiated statin therapy (N = 112,727). High intensity was initiated in 38.7% and low–moderate in 61.3%. In patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 25% discontinued treatment the first year; however, the discontinuation rate was similar regardless of the statin intensity. After excluding patients who died, changed therapy, or were nonadherent during the first year, 84,705 remained for the on-treatment analysis (OT-A). Patients were followed for 12.6 (median 5.6) years. In patients with eGFR 30–59 mL/min, high-intensity statin was associated with lower risk for the composite death, reinfarction, or stroke both in ITT-A (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87–0.99) and OT-A (HR 0.90; 0.83–0.99); the interaction test for OT-A indicated no heterogeneity for the eGFR < 60 mL/min group (P = 0.46). Similar associations were seen for all-cause mortality. We confirm that high-intensity statin treatment is associated with improved long-term outcome after AMI in patients with reduced kidney function. Most patients with reduced kidney function initiated on high-intensity statins are persistent after 1 year and equally persistent as patients initiated on low–moderate intensity.
|
|
| 6. |
- Mohammad, Moman A., et al.
(författare)
-
Intravenous beta-blocker therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention is not associated with benefit regarding short-term mortality : a Swedish nationwide observational study
- 2017
-
Ingår i: EuroIntervention. - : Europa Edition. - 1774-024X .- 1969-6213. ; 13:2, s. E210-E218
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: Our aim was to investigate the impact of intravenous (IV) beta-blocker therapy on short-term mortality and other in-hospital events in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and results: Using the nationwide Swedish Web-system for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-based care in Heart disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) registry, we identified all patients with STEMI undergoing PCI between 2006 and 2013. Patients with cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest at presentation were excluded. The primary endpoint was mortality within 30 days. Secondary endpoints were in-hospital events (mortality, cardiogenic shock and left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <40% at discharge). We adjusted for confounders with a multivariable model and propensity score matching. Out of 16,909 patients, 2,876 (17.0%) were treated with an IV beta-blocker. After adjusting for confounders, the IV beta-blocker group had higher 30-day all-cause mortality (HR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.14-1.83), more in-hospital cardiogenic shock (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.09-2.16) and were more often discharged with an LVEF <40% (OR: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.51-1.92).Conclusions: In this large nationwide observational study, the use of IV beta-blockers in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI was associated with higher short-term mortality, lower LVEF at discharge, as well as a higher risk of in-hospital cardiogenic shock.
|
|
| 7. |
- Venetsanos, Dimitrios, et al.
(författare)
-
Prasugrel versus ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Heart. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 1355-6037 .- 1468-201X. ; 107:14, s. 1145-1151
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The comparative efficacy and safety of prasugrel and ticagrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the association of treatment with clinical outcomes.Methods: In the SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-system for enhancement and development of evidence-based care in heart disease evaluated according to recommended therapies) registry, all patients with MI treated with PCI and discharged on prasugrel or ticagrelor from 2010 to 2016 were included. Outcomes were 1-year major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE, death, MI or stroke), individual components and bleeding. Multivariable adjustment, inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for confounders.Results: We included 37 990 patients, 2073 in the prasugrel group and 35 917 in the ticagrelor group. Patients in the prasugrel group were younger, more often admitted with ST elevation MI and more likely to have diabetes. Six to twelve months after discharge, 20% of patients in each group discontinued the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor they received at discharge. The risk for MACCE did not significantly differ between prasugrel-treated and ticagrelor-treated patients (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.24). We found no significant difference in the adjusted risk for death, recurrent MI or stroke alone between the two treatments. There was no significant difference in the risk for bleeding with prasugrel versus ticagrelor (2.5% vs 3.2%, adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.22). IPTW and PSM analyses confirmed the results.Conclusion: In patients with MI treated with PCI, prasugrel and ticagrelor were associated with similar efficacy and safety during 1-year follow-up.
|
|
| 8. |
- Wu, Eline, et al.
(författare)
-
Adverse events and their management during enhanced external counterpulsation treatment in patients with refractory angina pectoris : observations from a routine clinical practice
- 2022
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. - : Oxford University Press. - 1474-5151 .- 1873-1953. ; 21:2, s. 152-160
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIMS: Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a non-invasive treatment (35 one-hour sessions) for patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP). To avoid interruption of treatment, more knowledge is needed about potential adverse events (AE) of EECP and their appropriate management. To describe occurrence of AE and clinical actions related to EECP treatment in patients with RAP and compare the distribution of AE between responders and non-responders to treatment.METHODS AND RESULTS: A retrospective study was conducted by reviewing medical records of 119 patients with RAP who had undergone one EECP treatment and a 6-min-walk test pre- and post-treatment. Sociodemographic, medical, and clinical data related to EECP were collected from patients' medical records. An increased walking distance by 10% post-treatment, measured by 6-min-walk test, was considered a responder. The treatment completion rate was high, and the occurrence of AE was low. Adverse events occurred more often in the beginning and gradually decreased towards the end of EECP treatment. The AE were either device related (e.g. muscle pain/soreness) or non-device related (e.g. bradycardia). Medical (e.g. medication adjustments) and/or nursing (e.g. extra padding around the calves, wound dressing) actions were used. The AE distribution did not differ between responders (n = 49, 41.2%) and non-responders. Skin lesion/blister occurred mostly in responders and paraesthesia occurred mostly in non-responders.CONCLUSION: Enhanced external counterpulsation appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with RAP. However, nurses should be attentive and flexible to meet their patients' needs to prevent AE and early termination of treatment.
|
|
| 9. |
- Wu, Eline, et al.
(författare)
-
Effectiveness of Enhanced External Counterpulsation Treatment on Symptom Burden, Medication Profile, Physical Capacity, Cardiac Anxiety, and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Refractory Angina Pectoris
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0889-4655 .- 1550-5049. ; 35:4, s. 375-385
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patients with refractory angina pectoris experience recurrent symptoms that limit their functional capacity, including psychological distress and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL), despite optimized medical therapy. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is an evidence-based alternative noninvasive treatment. Although physical well-being and mental well-being are equally important components of health, few studies have investigated the psychological effects of EECP in patients with refractory angina pectoris.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of EECP treatment in patients with refractory angina pectoris regarding medication profile, physical capacity, cardiac anxiety, and HRQoL.METHODS: This quasi-experimental study with 1-group pretest-posttest design includes a 6-month follow-up of 50 patients (men, n = 37; mean age, 65.8 years) who had undergone 1 EECP course. The following pretreatment and posttreatment data were collected: medication use, 6-minute walk test results, functional class according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society, and self-reported (ie, questionnaire data) cardiac anxiety and HRQoL. In addition, the questionnaires were also completed at a 6-month follow-up.RESULTS: After EECP treatment, patients used significantly less nitrates (P < .001), walking distance increased on average by 46 m (P < .001), and Canadian Cardiovascular Society class improved (P < .001). In addition, all but 1 subscale of cardiac anxiety and all HRQoL components improved significantly (P < .05). The positive effects for cardiac anxiety and HRQoL were maintained at the 6-month follow-up.CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced external counterpulsation treatment resulted in reduced symptom burden, improved physical capacity, and less cardiac anxiety, leading to increased physical activity and enhanced life satisfaction for patients with refractory angina pectoris. Enhanced external counterpulsation treatment should be considered to improve the life situation for these patients.
|
|
| 10. |
- Wu, Eline
(författare)
-
Enhanced external counterpulsation treatment in patients with refractory angina pectoris with emphasis on physical capacity, health-related quality of life and safety : An explorative and interventional study
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Patients with refractory angina pectoris (RAP) suffer from debilitating symptoms with considerable limitation of functional capacity and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL) despite optimised medical therapy. In addition, frequent angina symptoms are strongly associated with psychological distress. The challenging management of RAP and the severe limitations and symptomatology experienced by these patients underscore the need for further research in more novel treatment approaches. Enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) is a potential non-invasive treatment that can decrease limiting symptoms in patients with RAP and is generally given as 35 one-hour sessions (i.e., one course) over seven weeks.Aim: The overall aim was to obtain a deeper understanding of patients’ experiences undergoing EECP treatment and to evaluate the effects of the treatment with focus on physical capacity, HRQoL and safety.Methods: An explorative and interventional study comprising both qualitative (paper I) and quantitative (papers II, III, and IV) study designs were performed. In paper I, semi-structured interviews took place with 15 strategically selected patients who had finished an EECP course at the two existing EECP clinics in Sweden. Data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis. In paper II, a quasi-experimental study with one-group pre-test/post-test design with a six-month follow-up was performed with 50 patients who had undergone one EECP course. The following pre- and post-treatment data were collected: medication use, six-minute walk test (6MWT), functional class according to the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), self-reported (i.e., questionnaire data) cardiac anxiety, and HRQoL. The questionnaires were also completed at a six-month follow-up. In paper III and IV, sociodemographic, medical, and clinical data related to EECP were collected by reviewing medical records of 119 patients with RAP who had undergone one EECP course and a 6MWT pre- and post-treatment. An increased walking distance by 10% post treatment, measured with 6MWT, was considered an adequate treatment response.Results: In paper I, the findings were divided into four content areas, each comprising three categories: (1) experiences before EECP was initiated comprised of uncharted territory, be given a new opportunity and gain insight; (2) experiences during EECP sessions comprised physical discomfort, need of distraction, and sense of security; (3) experiences between EECP sessions comprised physical changes, socializing, and coordinating everyday life; and (4) experiences after one course of EECP treatment comprised improved physical well-being, improved mental well-being and maintaining angina in check. In paper II, patients used significantly less short-acting nitrates (p <. 001), walking distance increased on average by 46 m (p < .001), and CCS class improved after one EECP course (p < .001). In addition, all but one subscale of cardiac anxiety and all HRQoL components improved significantly, and the positive effects were maintained at the six-month follow-up (p < .05). In paper III, 49 (41.2%) of the 119 patients, were responders to EECP. CCS class ≥ 3, left ventricle ejection fraction < 50%, and previous revascularisation (i.e., ≤ one type of intervention) were predictors of response (p < .05). In paper IV, the treatment completion rate was high, and the occurrence of adverse events (AE) was low. Most device-related AE required nursing actions, while medical actions were needed more in the non-device-related AE. The AE distribution did not differ between responders and non-responders. Skin lesion/blister occurred mostly in responders and paraesthesia occurred mostly in non-responders.Conclusions: The EECP treatment was perceived as an unknown option among these patients but also as be given a new opportunity to get better. The presence and care provided by the cardiac nurse contributed to a sense of security during treatment. The treatment resulted in reduced symptom burden, improved physical capacity and HRQoL, and less cardiac anxiety, leading to increased physical activity and enhanced life satisfaction for patients with RAP. Moreover, the EECP should be considered preferentially for patients who have a greater functional impairment, evidence of systolic left ventricular dysfunction, and exposure to fewer types of revascularisation. The EECP treatment appears to be a safe and well-tolerated treatment option in patients with RAP.
|
|
