1. |
|
|
2. |
- Di Vaio, Gianfranco, et al.
(författare)
-
Citation success : Evidence from economic history journal publications
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Explorations in economic history. - : Elsevier BV. - 0014-4983 .- 1090-2457. ; 49:1, s. 92-104
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study examines the determinants of citation success among authors who have recently published their work in economic history journals. Besides offering clues about how to improve one's scientific impact, our citation analysis also sheds light on the state of the field of economic history. Consistent with our expectations, we find that full professors, authors appointed at economics and history departments, and authors working in Anglo-Saxon and German countries are more likely to receive citations than other scholars. Long and co-authored articles are also a factor for citation success. We find similar patterns when assessing the same authors' citation success in economics journals. As a novel feature, we demonstrate that the diffusion of research publication of working papers, as well as conference and workshop presentations - has a first-order positive impact on the citation rate.
|
|
3. |
- Enflo, Kerstin, et al.
(författare)
-
Did Globalization Drive Convergence? Identifying Cross-Country Growth Regimes in the Long Run
- 2011
-
Ingår i: European Economic Review. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-572X .- 0014-2921. ; 55:6, s. 832-844
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper is the first to apply a finite mixture model to a sample of 64 nations to endogenously analyze the cross-country growth behavior over the period 1870-2003. Results show that growth patterns were segmented in two worldwide regimes, the one characterized by convergence in per capita income, and the other by divergence. Interestingly, when three historical epochs are distinctly analyzed, in order to investigate the empirical link between globalization and convergence, the dynamics which dominated over the whole period seem to have emerged only during the post-1950 years. In contrast, the First Global Wave was marked by persistent heterogeneities.
|
|