| 1. |
- Brenner, Philip, et al.
(författare)
-
Substance use disorders and risk for treatment resistant depression : a population-based, nested case-control study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Addiction. - : Wiley. - 0965-2140 .- 1360-0443. ; 115:4, s. 768-777
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and aims: Treatment-resistant depression (TRD), defined as inadequate treatment response after at least two adequate treatment trials, is common among patients initiating antidepressant treatment. Current or previous substance use disorders (SUD) are common among patients with depression and often lead to worse treatment outcomes. However, in clinical studies, SUD have not been found to increase the risk for TRD. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between SUD and TRD.Design: Nested case-control study.Setting: Nation-wide governmental health-care registers in Sweden.Cases and controls: Data on prescribed drugs and diagnoses from specialized health care were used to establish a prospectively followed cohort of antidepressant initiators with depression (n = 121 669) from 2006 to 2014. Of these, 15 631 patients (13%) were defined as TRD cases, with at least three treatment trials within a single depressive episode. Each case with TRD was matched on socio-demographic data with five controls with depression.Measurements: Crude and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) estimated the association between TRD and SUD diagnosis and/or treatment in five different time intervals until the time for fulfillment of TRD definition for the case. The analysis was adjusted for clinical and socio-demographic covariates.Findings: Having any SUD during, or <= 180 days before start of, antidepressant treatment was associated with almost double the risk for TRD [<= 180 days before: adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.86, CI = 1.70-2.05]. Increased risks for TRD were found <= 180 days before treatment start for the subcategories of sedative use (aOR = 2.37; 1.88-2.99), opioids (aOR = 2.02; 1.48-2.75), alcohol (aOR = 1.77; CI = 1.59-1.98) and combined substance use (aOR = 2.31; 1.87-2.99).Conclusions: Recent or current substance use disorders is positively associated with treatment resistance among patients initiating treatment for depression.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Brenner, Philip, et al.
(författare)
-
Treatment-resistant depression as risk factor for substance use disorders : a nation-wide register-based cohort study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Addiction. - : Wiley. - 0965-2140 .- 1360-0443. ; 114:7, s. 1274-1282
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and aims Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is common among patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). MDD may increase the risk for developing substance use disorders (SUD). The aim of this study was to investigate the risk for developing SUD among patients with TRD compared with other depressed patients.Design Observational cohort study.Setting Nation-wide governmental health registers in Sweden.Participants All patients aged 18-69 years with an MDD diagnosis in specialized health care who had received at least one antidepressant prescription during 2006-14 were identified. Patients with at least three treatment trials within a single depressive episode were classified with TRD.Measurements Patients with TRD were compared with the whole MDD cohort regarding risk for obtaining a SUD diagnosis or medication using survival analyses adjusted for socio-demographics and comorbidities.Findings Of 121 669 MDD patients, 13% were classified with TRD. Among the patients without any history of SUD, patients with TRD had a risk increase for any SUD both ≤ 1 and > 1 year after antidepressant initiation [> 1 year hazard ratio (HR) = 1.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.3-1.5]. Risks were elevated for the subcategories of opioid (HR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5) and sedative SUD (HR = 2.7, 95% CI = 2.2-3.2). Patients with a history of SUD had a risk increase for any SUD ≤ 1 year after start of treatment (HR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4), and both ≤ 1 year and > 1 year for sedative (> 1 year HR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.3-3.0) and multiple substance SUD (HR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.5).Conclusions Patients with treatment-resistant depression may be at greater risk for substance use disorders compared with other patients with major depressive disorder. Patterns may differ for patients with and without a history of substance use disorders, and for different categories of substance use disorder.
|
|
| 5. |
- DiBernardo, Allitia, et al.
(författare)
-
Humanistic outcomes in treatment resistant depression : a secondary analysis of the STAR*D study
- 2018
-
Ingår i: BMC Psychiatry. - : BMC. - 1471-244X. ; 18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundIn the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, a third of patients did not achieve remission or adequate response after two treatment trials, fulfilling requirements for treatment resistant depression (TRD). The present study is a secondary analysis of the STAR*D data conducted to compare the humanistic outcomes in patients with TRD and non-TRD MDD.MethodsPatients with major depressive disorder who entered level 3 of the STAR*D were included in the TRD group, while patients who responded to treatment and entered follow-up from level 1 or 2 were included in the non-TRD group. The first visit in level 1 was used for baseline assessments. The time-point of assessments for comparison was the first visit in level 3 for TRD patients (median day: 141), and the visit closest to 14160days from baseline for non-TRD patients. Outcomes were assessed by the 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF12), 16-item Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment scale (WPAI). Scores were compared in a linear model with adjustment for covariates including age, gender, and depression severity measured by the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS17) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS).ResultsA total of 2467 (TRD: 377; non-TRD: 2090) patients were studied. TRD patients were slightly older (mean age 44 vs 42years), had a higher proportion of men (49% vs 37%, p<.0001), and baseline depression severity (HDRS17: 24.4 vs 22.0, p<.0001) vs non-TRD patients. During follow-up, TRD patients had lower health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores on mental (30 vs 45.7) and physical components (47.7 vs 48.9) of the SF12, and lower Q-LES-Q scores (43.6 vs 63.7), greater functional and work impairments and productivity loss vs non-TRD patients (all p<0.05).Conclusion Patients with TRD had worse HRQOL, work productivity, and social functioning than the non-TRD patients.
|
|
| 6. |
- Hagg, David, et al.
(författare)
-
A register-based approach to identifying treatment-resistant depression : Comparison with clinical definitions
- 2020
-
Ingår i: PLOS ONE. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 15:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Several definitions of treatment-resistant depression (TRD) are used for clinical research, but no verified model for use in register data exists. We aimed to compare a novel model created for use in register data-the Karolinska Institutet Model (KIM)-to the clinical definitions regarding the proportion of patients identified with TRD, their characteristics and clinical outcomes. Methods All patients in Sweden initiating antidepressant treatment with a diagnosis of depression in specialized healthcare 2006-2014 were identified and followed in national registers. In KIM, patients who initiated a third sequential, >28-day antidepressant treatment trial were defined as having TRD. Proportion of TRD and patient characteristics were compared with register adaptations of the European Staging Model (ESM), Massachusetts General Hospital Staging Method (MGH-s), and Maudsley Staging Model (MSM). Differences in patient characteristics were assessed with Chi-square tests and one-way ANOVAs. Hazard ratios for psychiatric hospitalization and for death from external causes were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regressions. Results Out of 127,108 antidepressant initiators with depression, the highest proportion of TRD was found using the MGH-s (19.0%), followed by MSM (15.3%), KIM (12.9%), and ESM (9.5%). Clinical characteristics were similar across the models. Compared with TRD patients identified by KIM, those identified by ESM had a marginally higher risk for psychiatric hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.03, 95%CI 1.00-1.05), whereas those identified by MGH-s (aHR 0.92; 0.90-0.94) and MSM (aHR 0.95; 0.94-0.97) had a slightly reduced risk. Patients identified by MGH-s showed a reduced mortality compared with KIM (aHR 0.84; 0.72-0.98). Conclusions This study provides insight into the differing characteristics of patients captured by various TRD models when used for register research. Models yielding lower proportions of TRD seemed to identify patients with greater morbidity. The KIM may be useful for register based research in TRD.
|
|
| 7. |
- Li, Gang, et al.
(författare)
-
All-cause mortality in patients with treatment-resistant depression : a cohort study in the US population
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Annals of General Psychiatry. - : BMC. - 1744-859X. ; 18:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) may represent a substantial proportion of major depressive disorder (MDD); however, the risk of mortality in TRD is still incompletely assessed. Methods Data were obtained from Optum Clinformatics (TM) Extended, a US claims database. Date of the first antidepressant (AD) dispensing was designated as the index date for study entry and 6 months prior to that was considered the baseline period. Patients with MDD aged >= 18 years, index date between January 1, 2008 and September 30, 2015, no AD claims during baseline, and continuous enrollment in the database during baseline were included. Patients who started a third AD regimen after two regimens of appropriate duration were included in the TRD cohort. All-cause mortality was compared between patients with TRD and non-TRD MDD using a proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier estimate with TRD status being treated as a time-varying covariate. The model was adjusted for study year, age, gender, depression diagnosis, substance use disorder, psychiatric comorbidities, and Charlson comorbidity index. Results Out of 355,942 patients with MDD, 34,176 (9.6%) met the criterion for TRD. TRD was associated with a significantly higher mortality compared with non-TRD MDD (adjusted HR: 1.29; 95% CI 1.22-1.38; p < 0.0001). Survival time was significantly shorter in the TRD cohort compared with the non-TRD MDD cohort (p < 0.0001). Conclusions Patients with TRD had a higher all-cause mortality compared with non-TRD MDD patients.
|
|
| 8. |
- Reutfors, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Mortality in treatment-resistant unipolar depression : A register-based cohort study in Sweden
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Affective Disorders. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV. - 0165-0327 .- 1573-2517. ; 238, s. 674-679
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The impact of treatment resistant depression (TRD) on mortality is not established. Methods: Using Swedish national registers, 118,774 patients between 18-69 years of age who had been prescribed an antidepressant and been diagnosed with depression in specialized care were identified. Patients with at least two additional treatment trials during the same depressive episode were classified as having TRD. Data on the covariates of sex, age, history of depression, self-harm, substance use disorders, and other psychiatric and somatic comorbidities was also used. Relative risks comparing TRD patients with other depressed patients were calculated as hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality and for external and non-external causes of death, as well as excess mortality rate ratios (EMRR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: In total 15,013 patients (13%) were classified with TRD. Adjusted HR for all-cause mortality was 1.35 (95% CI 1.21-1.50). Mortality from external causes (including suicides and accidents) was markedly higher in TRD patients than in other depressed patients (HR 1.97; 1.69-2.29), while mortality from non-external causes was similar. The adjusted EMRR was 1.52 (1.31-1.76), highest among patients 18-29 years old (EMRR 2.03; 1.31-1.76) and patients without somatic comorbidity (EMRR 1.99; 1.63-2.43). Limitations: Severity of depression and adherence to treatment were not available in the data. Conclusions: Patients with TRD may have an increased all-cause mortality compared to other depressed patients, mainly for external causes of death. The relative mortality is highest among young and physically healthy patients.
|
|
