| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Bjermer, Leif, et al.
(författare)
-
The use of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) as complementary therapy in asthma
- 2002
-
Ingår i: Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease. - 1122-0643. ; 57:1, s. 76-83
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The cysteinyl-leukotrienes (cysLTs: LTC4, LTD4 and LTE4) have an important pathophysiological role in asthma. They are not only extremely potent bronchoconstrictors, but are also involved in the central mechanisms of the asthmatic inflammation and the subsequent remodelling of the airways. Allergen-induced bronchoconstriction as well as spontaneous exacerbations of asthma are associated with increased secretion of LTE4 in urine. This increase does not seem to be affected by high doses of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids. On the contrary, both in vivo and in vitro experiments indicate that corticosteroids to a certain degree may even upregulate the cysLTs synthesis. Moreover, inhaled medication may not get as far as the small airways, which are affected by inflammatory changes in asthma. Hence, the combination of an oral leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) seems a rational therapeutic approach to achieve a more complete control of the inflammatory mechanisms in asthma. The additive effects by combining an LTRA with an ICS have been investigated in adults as well as in children from 6-14 years of age. The addition of LTRA improves lung function, and reduces day and night time symptoms in all age groups. More importantly, the combination has also been found to decrease the exacerbation rates in all age groups. More recently, a few studies have compared the effect of additive therapy with LTRA and ICS versus long-acting beta 2-agonists (LABAs) and ICS in asthmatics. Depending on the patient and outcome parameters preselection, some studies found that addition of LABA to ICS resulted in a better lung function and a better overall disease control. Yet one--unsponsored-study, comparing the protective effects of LABA versus LTRA on inflammatory outcome parameters in asthma, found a significant protection against airway hyperresponsiveness to adenosine monophosphate (AMP), together with significant decreases in exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and sputum eosinophils following one week treatment with LTRA, whereas the initial protection by LABA on the AMP responsiveness was lost after one week, and no anti-inflammatory effects could be observed. Similar beneficial effects from LTRA therapy are expected in patients with nocturnal asthma, in whom a decreased responsiveness to corticosteroids has been demonstrated. The choice of either combination therapy has clinical implications. It seems that especially patients with a suboptimal lung function and a significant beta 2-agonist reversibility will benefit from the addition of a LABA, whereas asthmatics with mainly exercise-induced asthma, nocturnal symptoms, or a frequent worsening due to low tolerance to provocative stimuli, may mostly benefit by adding an LTRA to ICS. However, it remains to be determined which combination has the most profound effect on the inflammatory process and the structural changes in asthma.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- De Prins, L, et al.
(författare)
-
White Paper on European Patient Needs and Suggestions on Chronic Type 2 Inflammation of Airways and Skin by EUFOREA
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Frontiers in allergy. - : Frontiers Media SA. - 2673-6101. ; 3, s. 889221-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Type 2 inflammation underlies the chronicity of disease in subgroups of patients with asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and atopic dermatitis (AD), that often co-exist. Although several studies have investigated the unmet needs of asthma, AD and CRSwNP as such, little is known about the similarities and differences in experiences and perspectives of the current management of patients with comorbid Type 2 inflammatory diseases.AimsTo improve insight into the common and organ-specific needs of patients with Type 2 inflammation and comorbidities, allowing the formulation of recommendations to better address these needs in the future.MethodologyThis qualitative study was conducted between July 2021 and December 2021 using semi-structured face-to-face or telephone interviews with patients suffering from year-long severe chronic Type 2 inflammation and at least one co-morbid inflammatory condition. Seven participating academic centers in Europe interviewed asthma (Copenhagen and Leuven), CRSwNP (London, Amsterdam and Crete) and/or AD (Oldenburg and Zurich) patients on patient characteristics, disease severity, shortcomings of current care pathways and suggestions for improvement of care. Transcripts were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis approach.ResultsEighty-one patients with severe Type 2 inflammation and comorbidities were interviewed. Similar needs were recognized by patients with Type 2 inflammation, with both a lack of coordination in care and a lack of a real cure reported as being most frustrating. However, several needs are specific to asthma, CRSwNP and AD. Suggestions for improvement of care were generic across diseases, such as the implementation of a multidisciplinary approach, the improved facilitation of access to better treatments, the increase of general awareness on disease burden, and better educational programs for healthcare providers and patients. Of note, patients with CRSwNP also stated the need for alternatives to sinus surgery, whereas patients with asthma requested better medical care to prevent exacerbations and patients with AD would warmly welcome the reimbursement of emollients.ConclusionPatients with asthma, CRSwNP and AD have shared unmet needs that need to be addressed by physicians, the academic community and health policy makers. This survey provides unique recommendations made by patients for the implementation of better care.
|
|
| 7. |
- Del Giacco, S. R., et al.
(författare)
-
Allergy in severe asthma
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Allergy: European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. - : Wiley. - 0105-4538. ; 72:2, s. 207-220
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- It is well recognized that atopic sensitization is an important risk factor for asthma, both in adults and in children. However, the role of allergy in severe asthma is still under debate. The term 'Severe Asthma' encompasses a highly heterogeneous group of patients who require treatment on steps 4-5 of GINA guidelines to prevent their asthma from becoming 'uncontrolled', or whose disease remains 'uncontrolled' despite this therapy. Epidemiological studies on emergency room visits and hospital admissions for asthma suggest the important role of allergy in asthma exacerbations. In addition, allergic asthma in childhood is often associated with severe asthma in adulthood. A strong association exists between asthma exacerbations and respiratory viral infections, and interaction between viruses and allergy further increases the risk of asthma exacerbations. Furthermore, fungal allergy has been shown to play an important role in severe asthma. Other contributing factors include smoking, pollution and work-related exposures. The 'Allergy and Asthma Severity' EAACI Task Force examined the current evidence and produced this position document on the role of allergy in severe asthma.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
