| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Andersen, I, et al.
(författare)
-
Does job strain mediate the effect of Socio-economic Group on smoking behaviour? The impact of different health policies in Denmark and Sweden
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. - : SAGE Publications. - 1651-1905 .- 1403-4948. ; 36:6, s. 598-606
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims: The aim was to compare the impact of socioeconomic groups (SEG) on the risk of being a daily smoker or quitter, and to investigate whether the potentially mediating effect of psychosocial working conditions was similar in the Danish and the Swedish populations. Methods: The study populations consisted of 10,049 employed participants, aged 18-64 years, 51% women, randomly selected from the general populations in the Oresund region, 1999-2000. Odds ratios (OR) for daily-smokers and "non-quitters'' were computed for two age-groups and two SEGs in gender specific models, stratified by country. The association between SEG, current smoking, quitting, and influence at work, job demand and jobstrain, respectively, was tested by means of logistic regression. Results: The contextual determinants defined by country had a different effect on smoking prevalence among men and women and among age groups. Low influence and job strain seemed to have an effect on smoking among Danish women, but not among Swedish women. The OR of being a daily smoker were higher in men than women among younger Danes, but higher in women than men among Swedes. The prevalence of low influence, high demand and job strain was higher and more socially skewed among the Swedes, but did not mediate the effect of SEG on smoking behaviour. Conclusions: The smoking prevalence was lower and the quit-rates higher among Swedes than Danes. Both countries had social differences in smoking that in absolute terms were rather similar, but in relative terms were higher in Sweden. The mediating effect of psychosocial working conditions was lacking. The determinants of smoking behaviours must be found somewhere else in the social and cultural context.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Blank, N, et al.
(författare)
-
Short-term and long-term sick-leave in Sweden: relationships with social circumstances, working conditions and gender
- 1995
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of social medicine. - : SAGE Publications. - 0300-8037. ; 23:4, s. 265-272
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The primary aim of the study was to analyse similarities and differences between repeated spells of short-term sick-leave (more than 3 spells of less than 7 days' duration in a 12-month period) and long-term absence through sickness (at least 1 spell of more than 59 days' duration in a 12-month period) in relation to variables representing certain social circumstances and aspects of the work situation. Particular attention was paid to gender differences. The study, which had a cross-sectional design, employed data from the surveys of living conditions (ULF) conducted by Statistics Sweden over the period 1986-89. The study group comprised 13,828 employed persons between the ages of 16 and 65. The results suggested the existence of a common mechanism by which a variety of factors are related to the taking of both repeated short spells and long-term sick-leave; gender differences with regard to the effect of working conditions on the taking of sick-leave may be incorrectly estimated if factors related to occupational structure are not taken into consideration; a less than additive effect of physical job demands and repeated short spells of sick-leave on subjective health was found.
|
|
| 7. |
- Blank, N, et al.
(författare)
-
Social inequalities in the experience of illness in Sweden: a "double suffering"
- 1996
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian journal of social medicine. - : SAGE Publications. - 0300-8037. ; 24:2, s. 81-89
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper analyses the factors involved in differences in the experience of long-term illness (severe and non-severe illness), as measured in terms of self-reported frequency and intensity of symptoms. The study has a cross-sectional design. It uses a database from the Survey of Living Conditions of Statistics Sweden, and treats a representative sample of the employed Swedish population ( n = 13,501), aged between 16 and 65, interviewed over the period 1986–89. The results show that male manual workers report more non-severe and severe illness than non-manual workers, and that manual and lower-level non-manual female workers report more severe illness, but not non-severe illness, than intermediate/higher-level non-manual working females. The observed class differences in experience of severity of illness are partly explained by the factors investigated (job demands, personal economic difficulties, smoking daily, weak social network) in the case of men, and virtually entirely in the case of women. Other ill-health dimensions, such as self-rated general health and impaired working capacity, prove to be related to severity of illness, the latter being more strongly associated with experience of severe illness than the former irrespective of social class. The results lend support to the hypothesis that manual classes are subjected to what might be called “double suffering”; they have more long-term illnesses and also experience these illnesses with greater intensity and frequency.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
