SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Dregelid Einar) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Dregelid Einar)

  • Resultat 1-3 av 3
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Fosse, Erik, et al. (författare)
  • Duraflo II coating of cardiopulmonary bypass circuits reduces complement activation, but does not affect the release of granulocyte enzymes : a European multicentre study
  • 1997
  • Ingår i: European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. - 1010-7940 .- 1873-734X. ; 11:2, s. 320-327
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: This study was carried out to: (a) compare complement and granulocyte activation during cardiac operations in patients operated with cardiopulmonary bypass coated with heparin by the Duraflo II method, with activation in patients operated with uncoated circuits; and (b) relate complement, and granulocyte activation to selected adverse effects. METHODS: In a multicentre study among Rikshospitalet, Ullevaal Hospital in Norway and Uppsala University Hospital in Sweden, plasma concentrations of the complement activation products C4b/iC4b/C4c (C4bc), C3b/iC3b/C3c (C3bc), the terminal SC5b-9 complement complex (TCC), and the granulocyte proteins myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin were assessed in two groups of patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass. Seventy-six patients underwent surgery operated with circuits coated by the Duraflo II heparin coating and 75 uncoated circuits. The same amount of systemic heparin was administered to all patients. RESULTS: In both groups a significant increase in C4bc was first seen by the end of operation, from 86.7 +/- 12.5 to 273.0 +/- 277.4 nM in controls and from 86.9 +/- 18.5 to 320.2 +/- 190.5 nM in the control group, confirming previous documentation that the classical pathway is not activated during CPB, but as a consequence of protamin administration. The formation of C4bc did not differ significantly between the two groups. In the uncoated group the C3bc concentration increased from 124.0 +/- 15.3 to a maximum of 1176.1 +/- 64.7 nM (P < 0.01) and in the coated group it increased from 129.8 +/- 16.1 to a maximum of 1019.4 +/- 54.9 nM (P < 0.01) during CPB. Summary values but not peak values differed significantly between the groups. In the uncoated group the TCC concentration increased from 0.52 +/- 0.03 to a maximum value of 8.09 +/- 0.57 AU/ml (P < 0.01) while in the coated group the TCC concentration increased from a baseline of 0.53 +/- 0.03 to a peak value of 5.2 +/- 0.24 AU/ml (P <0.01). The difference between the peak values was statistically significant (P = 0.00002). In both groups a significant increase in myeloperoxidase and lactoferrin release was observed by the end of operation. There was no difference in myeloperoxidase or lactoferrin release between the two groups. TCC levels were compared to the occurrence of perioperative infarction, development of lung or renal failure, postoperative bleeding, time on ventilator and days in hospital. Three patients developed perioperative infarction; the peak levels of TCC were significantly higher in these patients than in the 148 patients that did not develop infarction. The reduction in TCC formation in the heparin-coated group was not associated with differences in any of the other clinical parameters. Few adverse effects occurred in the study. The peak values of C3bc were higher in the patients needing inotropic support that in those who did not, the relevance of this finding remains uncertain. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that the Duraflo II heparin coating reduces complement activation, particularly TCC formation, during CPB, but not the release of specific neutrophil granule enzymes. No certain correlation was established between complement and granulocyte activation and clinical outcome.
  •  
2.
  • Moen, Oddvar, et al. (författare)
  • Attenuation of changes in leukocyte surface markers and complement activation with heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass
  • 1997
  • Ingår i: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. - 0003-4975 .- 1552-6259. ; 63:1, s. 105-111
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: The inflammatory response induced by cardiopulmonary bypass can result in severe organ dysfunction in some patients. This postperfusion response is caused mainly by contact between blood and the foreign surface of the cardiopulmonary bypass equipment and includes adhesion of leukocytes to vascular endothelium, which precedes a series of events that mediate inflammatory damage to tissues. METHODS: Low-risk patients accepted for coronary artery bypass grafting were randomized to operation with the cardiopulmonary bypass surface either completely heparin coated (Duraflo II) or uncoated. There were 12 patients in each group. Blood plasma sampled during cardiopulmonary bypass was analyzed for complement activation (C3bc and terminal SC5b-9 complement complex) and neutrophil activation (lactoferrin and myeloperoxidase). In addition, neutrophils, monocytes, and platelets were counted, and the expression of surface markers on the neutrophils and monocytes (complement receptor [CR] 1, CR3, CR4, and L-selectin) and on the platelets (P-selectin and CD41) was quantified with flow cytometry. RESULTS: Clinical and surgical results were similar in both groups. In the group with the heparin-coated surface, the formation of the terminal SC5b-9 complement complex was significantly reduced, and the counts of circulating leukocytes and platelets were significantly less reduced initially but were higher at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass compared with baseline. Also, the expression of CR1, CR3, and CR4 was significantly less upregulated and the L-selectin, significantly less downregulated on monocytes and neutrophils. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that heparin coating reduces complement activation and attenuates the leukocyte integrin and selectin response that occurs when uncoated circuits are used.
  •  
3.
  • Moen, Oddvar, et al. (författare)
  • Centrifugal pump and heparin coating improves cardiopulmonary bypass biocompatibility
  • 1996
  • Ingår i: Annals of Thoracic Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 0003-4975 .- 1552-6259. ; 62:4, s. 1134-1140
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: Centrifugal pumps are being used increasingly for short-term extracorporeal circulation purposes such as during heart operations. Whether the centrifugal pump improves the cardiopulmonary bypass biocompatibility has not been fully documented. METHODS: A roller pump (n = 20) was compared in vivo with a centrifugal pump (n = 20) in groups of patients in which cardiopulmonary bypass circuits that were either totally heparin coated (Carmeda BioActive Surface; n = 20) or uncoated (n = 20) were used. We expected the heparin coating to attenuate blood activation, thus possibly making the comparison of the two pumps easier with respect to their different blood activation potentials. Samples of blood plasma, obtained during cardiopulmonary bypass from low-risk coronary artery bypass grafting patients, were analyzed for hemolysis (plasma haemoglobin), complement activation (C3bc and the terminal complement complex), a complement lytic inhibitor (vitronectin), coagulation activation (fibrinopeptide A), granulocyte activation (lactoferrin), and platelet activation (beta-thromboglobulin). RESULTS: The concentrations of terminal complement complex, lactoferrin, and beta-thromboglobulin were significantly lower in association with heparin-coated surfaces. The concentration of plasma hemoglobin was significantly lower in association with the centrifugal pump. In uncoated circuits, the beta-thromboglobulin level was significantly higher in association with the roller pump than with the centrifugal pump, but this significant reduction in the beta-thromboglobulin level did not hold true for the heparin-coated circuit group. CONCLUSIONS: A heparin-coated cardiopulmonary bypass surface reduces the blood activation potential during cardiopulmonary bypass, and the centrifugal pump causes less hemolysis than the roller pump.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-3 av 3

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy