SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Extended search

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Drevin Linda) "

Search: WFRF:(Drevin Linda)

  • Result 1-10 of 22
Sort/group result
   
EnumerationReferenceCoverFind
1.
  • Bratt, Ola, et al. (author)
  • Family History and Probability of Prostate Cancer, Differentiated by Risk Category : A Nationwide Population-Based Study
  • 2016
  • In: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0027-8874 .- 1460-2105. ; 108:10
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background: Familial prostate cancer risk estimates are inflated by clinically insignificant low-risk cancer, diagnosed after prostate-specific antigen testing. We provide age-specific probabilities of non-low-and high-risk prostate cancer. Methods: Fifty-one thousand, eight hundred ninety-seven brothers of 32 807 men with prostate cancer were identified in Prostate Cancer data Base Sweden (PCBaSe). Nelson-Aalen estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for cumulative, family history-stratified probabilities of any, non-low-(any of Gleason score >= 7, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] >= 10 ng/mL, T3-4, N1, and/or M1) and high-risk prostate cancer (Gleason score >= 8 and/or T3-4 and/or PSA >= 20 ng/mL and/or N1 and/or M1). Results: The population probability of any prostate cancer was 4.8% (95% CI = 4.8% to 4.9%) at age 65 years and 12.9% (95% CI = 12.8% to 12.9%) at age 75 years, of non-low-risk prostate cancer 2.8% (95% CI = 2.7% to 2.8%) at age 65 years and 8.9% (95% CI = 8.8% to 8.9%) at age 75 years, and of high-risk prostate cancer 1.4% (95% CI = 1.3% to 1.4%) at age 65 years and 5.2% (95% CI = 5.1% to 5.2%) at age 75 years. For men with one affected brother, probabilities of any prostate cancer were 14.9% (95% CI = 14.1% to 15.8%) at age 65 years and 30.3% (95% CI = 29.3% to 31.3%) at age 75 years, of non-low-risk prostate cancer 7.3% (95% CI = 6.7% to 7.9%) at age 65 years and 18.8% (95% CI = 17.9% to 19.6%) at age 75 years, and of high-risk prostate cancer 3.0% (95% CI = 2.6% to 3.4%) at age 65 years and 8.9% (95% CI = 8.2% to 9.5%) at age 75 years. Probabilities were higher for men with a stronger family history. For example, men with two affected brothers had a 13.6% (95% CI = 9.9% to 17.6 %) probability of high-risk cancer at age 75 years. Conclusions: The age-specific probabilities of non-low-and high-risk cancer presented here are more informative than relative risks of any prostate cancer and more suitable to use for counseling men with a family history of prostate cancer.
  •  
2.
  • Bratt, Ola, et al. (author)
  • Undertreatment of Men in Their Seventies with High-risk Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer
  • 2015
  • In: European Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560. ; 68:1, s. 53-58
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Background: Many elderly men with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer (HRnMPCa) do not receive radical treatment, despite the high mortality associated with conservative management. Objective: To investigate how age and comorbidity affect treatment of men with HRnMPCa. Design, setting, and participants: This was an observational nationwide register study during 2001-2012. We identified 19 190 men of <80 yr of age diagnosed with HRnMPCa in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden and 95 948 age-matched men without prostate cancer in the register of the total population. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The outcome was the proportion of men with HRnMPCa receiving radical treatment (radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy). Vital status and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were obtained from nationwide registers. The 10-yr survival of men without prostate cancer, stratified by age and CCI, was used as a measure of the life expectancy of the men with prostate cancer. Results and limitations: The proportions receiving radical treatment varied with life expectancy among men younger than 70 yr, whereas use of these treatments did not match the long life expectancy of men in their seventies with CCI 0-1. Only 10% of men aged 75-80 yr with CCI 0 received radical treatment despite 52% probability of 10-yr life expectancy, compared with approximately half of the men younger than 70 yr with a similar life expectancy. The use of radical treatment for HRnMPCa increased with time in all Swedish counties, but a threefold difference between counties remained in 2009-2012 for patients aged 70-80 yr with CCI 0-1. Uncertain external validity is a study limitation, and the impact of physician versus patient preferences on treatment selection could not be assessed. Conclusions: Otherwise healthy men in their seventies with HRnMPCa were less likely to receive radical treatment than younger men with a similar life expectancy, although increasing use of radical treatment was observed during the study period. Our findings highlight the need for improved methods for clinical decision-making, including improved assessment of life expectancy. Patient summary: We performed a nationwide register study that showed that many healthy men in their seventies live for at least another 10 yr. Despite this long life expectancy, men in their seventies with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer were often not treated with radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy, possibly because their life expectancy was underestimated. Our study highlights the need for improved clinical decision-making, which should incorporate an assessment of the patient's life expectancy.
  •  
3.
  • Carlsson, Sigrid, 1982, et al. (author)
  • Population-based study of long-term functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment
  • 2016
  • In: BJU International. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 117:6B, s. E36-E45
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term urinary, sexual and bowel functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment at a median follow-up of 12 years (IQR 11-13).PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this nationwide, population-based study, we identified from the National Prostate Cancer Register, Sweden, 6,003 men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (clinical local stage T1-2, any Gleason score, prostate specific antigen < 20 ng/mL, NX or N0, MX or M0) between 1997 and 2002 who were ≤70 years at diagnosis. 1,000 prostate cancer-free controls were selected, matched for age and county of residence. Functional outcomes were evaluated with a validated self-reported questionnaire.RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 3,937/6,003 cases (66%) and 459/1,000 (46%) controls. Twelve years post diagnosis, at a median age of 75 years, the proportion of cases with adverse symptoms was 87% for erectile dysfunction or sexually inactive, 20% for urinary incontinence and 14% for bowel disturbances. The corresponding proportions for controls were 62%, 6% and 7%, respectively. Men with prostate cancer, except those on surveillance, had an increased risk of erectile dysfunction, compared to control men. Radical prostatectomy was associated with increased risk of urinary incontinence (odds ratio; OR 2.29 [95% CI 1.83-2.86] and radiotherapy increased the risk of bowel dysfunction (OR 2.46 [95% CI 1.73-3.49]) compared to control men. Multi-modal treatment, in particular including androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), was associated with the highest risk of adverse effects; for instance radical prostatectomy followed by radiotherapy and ADT was associated with an OR of 3.74 [95 CI 1.76-7.95] for erectile dysfunction and OR 3.22 [95% CI 1.93-5.37] for urinary incontinence.CONCLUSION: The proportion of men who suffer long-term impact on functional outcomes after prostate cancer treatment was substantial.
  •  
4.
  • Danneman, Daniela, et al. (author)
  • Accuracy of prostate biopsies for predicting Gleason score in radical prostatectomy specimens : nationwide trends 2000-2012
  • 2017
  • In: BJU International. - : Wiley. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 119:1, s. 50-56
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objectives To investigate how well the Gleason score in diagnostic needle biopsies predicted the Gleason score in a subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen before and after the 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revision of Gleason grading, and if the recently proposed ISUP grades 1-5 (corresponding to Gleason scores 6, 3 + 4, 4 + 3, 8 and 9-10) better predict the RP grade. Patients and Methods All prostate cancers diagnosed in Sweden are reported to the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR). We analysed the Gleason scores and ISUP grades from the diagnostic biopsies and the RP specimens in 15 598 men in the NPCR who: were diagnosed between 2000 and 2012 with clinical stage T1-2 M0/X prostate cancer on needle biopsy; were aged <= 70 years; had serum PSA concentration of < 20 ng/mL; and underwent a RP < 6 months after diagnosis as their primary treatment. Results Prediction of RP Gleason score increased from 55 to 68% between 2000 and 2012. Most of the increase occurred before 2005 (nine percentage points; P < 0.001); however, when adjusting for Gleason score and year of diagnosis in a multivariable analysis, the prediction of RP Gleason score decreased over time (odds ratio [OR] 0.98; P < 0.002). A change in the ISUP grades would have led to a decreasing agreement between biopsy and RP grades over time, from 68% in 2000 to 57% in 2012, with an OR of 0.95 in multivariable analysis (P < 0.001). Conclusion Agreement between biopsy and RP Gleason score improved from 2000 to 2012, with most of the improvement occurring before the 2005 ISUP grading revision. Had ISUP grades been used instead of Gleason score, the agreement between biopsy and RP grade would have decreased, probably because of its separation of Gleason score 7 into ISUP grades 2 and 3 (Gleason score 3 + 4 vs 4 + 3).
  •  
5.
  • Danneman, Daniela, et al. (author)
  • Gleason inflation 1998-2011 : a registry study of 97 168 men
  • 2015
  • In: BJU International. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 1464-4096 .- 1464-410X. ; 115:2, s. 248-255
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Objectives: To study long-term trends in Gleason grading in a nationwide population and to assess the impact of the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revision in 2005 of the Gleason system on grading practices, as in recent years there has been a shift upwards in Gleason grading of prostate cancer. Patients and Methods: All newly diagnosed prostate cancers in Sweden are reported to the National Prostate Cancer Register (NPCR). In 97 168 men with a primary diagnosis of prostate cancer on needle biopsy from 1998 to 2011, Gleason score, clinical T stage (cT) and serum levels of prostate-specific antigen (s-PSA) at diagnosis were analysed. Results: Gleason score, cT stage and s-PSA were reported to the NPCR in 97%, 99% and 99% of cases. Before and after 2005, Gleason score 7-10 was diagnosed in 52% and 57%, respectively (P < 0.001). After standardisation for cT stage and s-PSA with 1998 as baseline these tumours increased from 59% to 72%. Among low-risk tumours (stage cT1 and s-PSA 4-10 ng/mL) Gleason score 7-10 increased from 16% in 1998 to 40% in 2011 (P trend < 0.001), mean 19% and 33% before and after 2005 (P < 0.001). Among high-risk tumours (stage T3 and s-PSA 20-50 ng/mL) Gleason score 7-10 increased from 65% in 1998 to 94% in 2011 (P trend < 0.001), mean 78% and 90% before and after 2005 (P < 0.001). A Gleason score of 2-5 was reported in 27% in 1998 and 1% in 2011. Gleason score 5 decreased sharply after 2005 and Gleason score 2-4 was almost abandoned. Conclusions: There has been a gradual shift towards higher Gleason grading, which started before 2005 but became more evident after the ISUP 2005 revision. Among low-stage tumours reporting of Gleason score 7-10 was more than doubled during the study period. When corrected for stage migration upgrading is considerable over recent decades. This has clinical consequences for therapy decisions such as eligibility for active surveillance. Grading systems need to be as stable as possible to enable comparisons over time and to facilitate the interpretation of the prognostic impact of grade.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Glombik, Dominik, 1988-, et al. (author)
  • Risk of second HPV-associated cancers in men with penile cancer
  • 2021
  • In: Acta Oncologica. - : Informa Healthcare. - 0284-186X .- 1651-226X. ; 60:5, s. 667-671
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the risk of HPV-associated oral cavity, oropharyngeal or anal cancer in men with penile cancer to test the hypothesis of an increased risk to develop a second HPV-associated cancer later in life.MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a population-based register study including all men in Sweden diagnosed with penile cancer between 2000 and 2012. For each patient, six men without penile cancer were matched based on age and county of residence. Data were retrieved from Swedish cancer and population registers, to assess the risk of oral cavity, oropharyngeal or anal cancer in patients with penile cancer. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risks in men with penile cancer were also compared with the background Swedish male population by use of standardized incidence ratios.RESULTS: In total, 1634 men with and 9804 without penile cancer were included in the study. Among men with penile cancer, four men were subsequently diagnosed with oral cavity cancer, one with oropharyngeal cancer and one with anal cancer. Corresponding numbers among the penile cancer-free men were ten, two and three, respectively. There was evidence of an increased risks of all three cancers under study with an HR of 2.84 (95% CI 0.89-9.06) for oral cavity cancer, 3.66 (95% CI 0.33-40.39) for oropharyngeal cancer and 2.34 (95% CI 0.24-22.47) for anal cancer. When comparing the incidence of these malignancies between penile cancer patients and the background population, the patterns of association were similar.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that men with penile cancer are at an increased risk of a second HPV-associated cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx and anal canal. Considering that our study was based on small numbers reflecting the rarity of these cancers, larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.
  •  
9.
  • Jansson, Fredrik, et al. (author)
  • Concordance of Non-Low-Risk Disease Among Pairs of Brothers With Prostate Cancer
  • 2018
  • In: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 36:18, s. 1847-1852
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • Purpose: Prostate cancer among first-degree relatives is a strong risk factor for diagnosis of prostate cancer, and the contribution of heritable factors in prostate cancer etiology is high. We investigated how the concordance of non-low-risk prostate cancer among brothers is affected by their genetic relation.Methods:We identified 4,262 pairs of brothers with prostate cancer in the Prostate Cancer Database Sweden. Their cancers were categorized as low risk (Gleason score 6; clinical stage T1-2, Nx/N0, Mx/M0; and prostate-specific antigen 10 ng/mL) or non-low risk. The odds ratio (OR) for concordance of non-low-risk cancer was calculated with logistic regression for the different types of fraternity (monozygotic twins, dizygotic twins, full brothers, and half-brothers)Results: Among monozygotic twins who both were diagnosed with prostate cancer, the OR for both brothers being in the non-low-risk category was 3.82 (95% CI, 0.99 to 16.72) after adjusting for age and year of diagnosis. Among full brothers, the corresponding adjusted OR was 1.21 (95% CI, 1.04 to 1.39). When the analysis was restricted to brothers who both were diagnosed within 4 years, the results were similar.Conclusion: Non-low-risk prostate cancer has a heritable pattern suggesting shared genetic factors, with the highest concordance among monozygotic twins. Our results suggest that a man whose brother has been diagnosed with a non-low-risk prostate cancer is at a clinically relevant increased risk of developing an aggressive prostate cancer himself.
  •  
10.
  • Kristiansen, Anna, et al. (author)
  • Prognostic significance and biopsy characteristics of prostate cancer with seminal vesicle invasion on radical prostatectomy : a nationwide population-based study
  • 2017
  • In: Pathology. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV. - 0031-3025 .- 1465-3931. ; 49:7, s. 715-720
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
    • The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI, pT3b) compared with extraprostatic extension (EPE) alone (pT3a) after radical prostatectomy, and to correlate pre-operative biopsy pathology with SVI and EPE. The National Prostate Cancer Register includes all prostate cancers diagnosed in Sweden. We analysed 4063 cases with stage category pT3a and 1371 cases with pT3b at radical prostatectomy between 2000 and 2012. Associations between pT3a and pT3b and progression were evaluated and adjusted for year, age, biopsy grade and s-PSA. Needle biopsy findings in these stages were compared. Patients with pT3b (n = 1371) had a higher risk of death from prostate cancer (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.5-3.3, p < 0.001) and death from any cause (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8, p < 0.001) than those with pT3a (n = 4063). They were also more likely to be treated with post-operative radiotherapy (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.4-1.7, p < 0.001) or androgen deprivation therapy (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.5-3.7, p < 0.001), indicating clinical progression. Yet, disease-specific survival of patients with stage pT3b was 94% after 6 years. Median cancer extent in pre-operative biopsies of pT3a and pT3b was 14 and 24 mm (p < 0.001), number of positive cores was four and five, (p < 0.001) and biopsy Gleason score was 8-10 in 11.6% and 27.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). SVI of prostate cancer is associated with worse outcome after radical prostatectomy than EPE alone. However, few patients with SVI die within 6 years from surgery, suggesting that radical prostatectomy may be curative in locally advanced cancers.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Result 1-10 of 22
Type of publication
journal article (21)
other publication (1)
Type of content
peer-reviewed (18)
other academic/artistic (4)
Author/Editor
Drevin, Linda (21)
Stattin, Pär (14)
Loeb, Stacy (6)
Garmo, Hans (6)
Robinson, David (6)
Lambe, Mats (5)
show more...
Egevad, Lars (5)
Akre, Olof (5)
Holmberg, Lars (4)
Bill-Axelson, Anna (4)
Bratt, Ola (4)
Carlsson, Sigrid, 19 ... (3)
Samaratunga, Hemamal ... (3)
Danneman, Daniela (3)
Delahunt, Brett (3)
Larsson, Anders (2)
Carlsson, Stefan (2)
Adolfsson, Jan (2)
Holmberg, Erik, 1951 (2)
Franck-Lissbrant, In ... (2)
Kirrander, Peter, 19 ... (2)
Torbrand, Christian (2)
Folkvaljon, Yasin (2)
Lissbrant, Ingela Fr ... (2)
Kristiansen, Anna (2)
Ulmert, David (1)
Andren, Ove, 1963- (1)
Widmark, Anders (1)
Andrén, Ove (1)
Forslund, Ola (1)
Johansson, Eva (1)
Bjartling, Carina (1)
Van Hemelrijck, Miek ... (1)
Ahlgren, Johan (1)
Svensson, Åke (1)
Fransson, Per (1)
Sundqvist, Pernilla, ... (1)
Frisell, Thomas (1)
Kirrander, Peter (1)
Davidsson, Sabina, 1 ... (1)
Håkansson, Ulf (1)
Wigertz, Annette (1)
Lundström, Karl-Joha ... (1)
Carlsson, Jessica, 1 ... (1)
Eriksson, Marie Hjal ... (1)
Makarov, Danil (1)
Jansson, Fredrik (1)
Stattin, Par (1)
Glombik, Dominik, 19 ... (1)
Oxelbark, Åsa (1)
show less...
University
Uppsala University (17)
Karolinska Institutet (17)
Umeå University (13)
Lund University (5)
University of Gothenburg (4)
Örebro University (3)
Language
English (22)
Research subject (UKÄ/SCB)
Medical and Health Sciences (22)

Year

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view