| 1. |
- Cerne, Annette, et al.
(författare)
-
When Institutional Logics Collide: How International Firms Navigate Sustainability Values in Global Markets
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Creating a Sustainable Competitive Position: Ethical Challenges for International Firms. - 9781804552520 - 9781804552490 ; 37, s. 153-175
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This book chapter takes an institutional perspective on competing logics in global markets concerned with sustainability values and how market actors in the form of buyers and sellers attempt to solve these conflicting situations. We do this by identifying competing institutional logics in global market contexts aiming for sustainability values, together with techniques for navigating these competing institutional logics in the organizational field studied. As an empirical illustration, we use a case study of buyers and sellers in two different markets where sustainability has come into focus for their market relationships. This viewpoint allows us to better understand how global market actors deal with the competing institutional logics in their market context. We make three contributions with this research: firstly, we identify the institutional logics in global markets towards sustainability; secondly, we demonstrate how global market actors prioritize among the competing logics and their market relationships and thirdly, we outline what this means for the relationship between buyers and sellers in global markets towards sustainability.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Elg, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Towards a Global Sustainability Approach: Challenges and Opportunities for Multinationals.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Creating a Sustainable Competitive Position: Ethical Challenges for International Firms. - 9781804552520 - 9781804552490 ; 37, s. 11-31
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We discuss how multinational enterprises (MNEs) can play a leading role and take more responsibility towards reducing inequalities by developing a global sustainability regime. We especially focus on how this may contribute towards the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Our purpose is to identify and discuss the components and activities that are needed to develop such a strategy and implement it in markets with different structural and institutional conditions. We will especially discuss interactions between the head office and the local subsidiaries/organizations as well as interactions with different salient groups of stakeholders. We focus on three highly significant groups: business, social and political actors. We identify four key components of a global sustainability approach – namely, (i) make it relevant within the organization, (ii) establish a legitimate sustainable network position, (iii) present incentives and gains that stimulate action and (iv) establish long-term salient structures. These components and the associated activities have not been discussed in a coherent manner although some aspects have been put forward in earlier studies. We present a comprehensive framework that suggests what role MNEs can play and what challenges they face while doing so. The chapter is based on more than 10 years’ experience of studying MNEs’ activities in developing as well as developed markets, including how they work with sustainability. The study is based on data from four Swedish MNEs and three major research projects.
|
|
| 4. |
- Ghauri, Pervez N, et al.
(författare)
-
Creating a Sustainable Competitive Position Through Ethical Behaviour
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Creating a Sustainable Competitive Position: Ethical Challenges for International Firms. - Leeds : Emerald Group Publishing Limited. - 1876-066X. - 9781804552520 - 9781804552490 ; 37, s. 1-8
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this chapter, we discuss the main themes of the book and give examples of how the rest of the chapters are related to these themes. We have identified two main aspects that are partly overlapping and are equally relevant for international firms’ work with ethical questions related to their business. One concerns how ethical behaviour related to sustainability can be applied as a main part of firms’ corporate strategy and how this may strengthen the international competitive position. This is particularly relevant when considering that it cannot be taken for granted that there is always a positive relationship and that actors may sometimes question an emphasis on ethical behaviour that goes beyond the accepted norms and regulations. The other main theme is related to international firms’ crucial role in supporting sustainability on an international level and contributing towards achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). Solving many of the challenges related to climate change, migration, poverty and inequality is likely to require the involvement of international firms. The book identifies several routes forward to achieve this.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Elg, Ulf, et al.
(författare)
-
Decision Making in Inter-firm Networks as a Political Process.
- 1997
-
Ingår i: Organization Studies. - : SAGE Publications. - 1741-3044 .- 0170-8406. ; 18, s. 361-384
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- A political-process-oriented approach to decision making is applied to an asymmetric network of firms, based on the notion of resource interdependen cies as the prime motivator of inter-firm exchange, and on a multi-dimensional view of power. Empirically, the paper draws upon a case study of the introduc tion of a computer-based decision aid (DPP) in the Swedish food industry. A theoretical model is developed, demonstrating how motives, structural condi tions and moves made by powerful as well as more dependent firms interact in shaping the decision process. A central theme is that structural change as well as the adoption of innovations within inter-firm networks is influenced by political activities during the decision process. The relevance of subtle moves aimed at influencing the perceptions and beliefs of other actors is espe cially stressed. The paper also suggests that more dependent firms do not necessarily give priority to balancing dependencies since they may actually jeopardize privileges not attainable within a less asymmetric structure.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
