| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- d'Amore, Francesco, et al.
(författare)
-
Up-Front Autologous Stem-Cell Transplantation in Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma : NLG-T-01
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Oncology. - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 30:25, s. 3093-3099
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose Systemic peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) respond poorly to conventional therapy. To evaluate the efficacy of a dose-dense approach consolidated by up-front high-dose chemotherapy (HDT) and autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in PTCL, the Nordic Lymphoma Group (NLG) conducted a large prospective phase II study in untreated systemic PTCL. This is the final report, with a 5-year median follow-up, of the NLG-T-01 study. Patients and Methods Treatment-naive patients with PTCL age 18 to 67 years (median, 57 years) were included. Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) -positive anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (ALCL) was excluded. An induction regimen of six cycles of biweekly CHOEP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, etoposide, and prednisone) was administered (in patients age > 60 years, etoposide was omitted). If in complete or partial remission, patients proceeded to consolidation with HDT/ASCT. Results Of 166 enrolled patients, 160 had histopathologically confirmed PTCL. The majority presented with advanced-stage disease, B symptoms, and elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase. A total of 115 underwent HDT/ASCT, with 90 in complete remission at 3 months post-transplantation. Early failures occurred in 26%. Treatment-related mortality was 4%. At 60.5 months of median follow-up, 83 patients were alive. Consolidated 5-year overall and progression-free survival (PFS) were 51% (95% CI, 43% to 59%) and 44% (95% CI, 36% to 52%), respectively. Best results were obtained in ALK-negative ALCL. Conclusion Dose-dense induction followed by HDT/ASCT was well tolerated and led to long-term PFS in 44% of treatment-naive patients with PTCL. This represents an encouraging outcome, particularly considering the high median age and adverse risk profile of the study population. Therefore, dose-dense induction and HDT/ASCT are a rational up-front strategy in transplantation-eligible patients with PTCL. J Clin Oncol 30: 3093-3099. (C) 2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
|
|
| 5. |
- Eskelund, Christian Winther, et al.
(författare)
-
Detailed Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Who Relapsed After the Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma Trials : MCL2 and MCL3
- 2021
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 2572-9241. ; 5:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable disease with a highly variable clinical course. The prognosis after relapse is generally poor, and no standard of care exists. We investigated the postrelapse outcomes of 149 patients who were initially treated in the Nordic Lymphoma Group trials, MCL2 or MCL3, both representing intensive cytarabine-containing frontline regimens including autologous stem cell transplant. Patients with progression of disease before 24 months (POD24, n = 51, 34%) displayed a median overall survival of 6.6 months compared with 46 months for patients with later POD (n = 98, 66%; P < 0.001). MCL international prognostic index, cell proliferation marker, blastoid morphology, and TP53 mutations showed independent prognostic value irrespective of POD24, and in a combined, exploratory risk score, patients with 0, 1, 2-3, or 4-5 high-risk markers, respectively, displayed a 5-year overall survival of 62%, 39%, 31%, and 0%. By a comparison of median progression-free survival of the different salvage therapies in the relapse setting, bendamustine-rituximab was superior to all other combination chemotherapy regimens; however, it was also associated with longer responses to last line of therapy. Collectively, we confirm the prognostic impact of POD24 and highlight the relevance of other biomarkers, and we emphasize the importance of novel therapies for patients with high-risk features at first POD.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Kolstad, Arne, et al.
(författare)
-
Molecular Monitoring after Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and Preemptive Rituximab Treatment of Molecular Relapse; Results from the Nordic Mantle Cell Lymphoma Studies (MCL2 and MCL3) with Median Follow-Up of 8.5 Years
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Biology of blood and marrow transplantation. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 1083-8791 .- 1523-6536. ; 23:3, s. 428-435
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The main objectives of the present study were to monitor minimal residual disease (MRD) in the bone marrow of patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) to predict clinical relapse and guide preemptive treatment with rituximab. Among the patients enrolled in 2 prospective trials by the Nordic Lymphoma Group, 183 who had completed autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and in whom an MRD marker had been obtained were included in our analysis. Fresh samples of bone marrow were analyzed for MRD by a combined standard nested and quantitative real-time PCR assay for Bcl-1/immunoglobulin heavy chain gene (IgH) and clonal IgH rear-rangements. Significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was demonstrated for patients who were MRD positive pre-ASCT (54 patients) or in the first analysis post-ASCT (23 patients). The median PFS was only 20 months in those who were MRD-positive in the first sample post-ASCT, compared with 142 months in the MRD-negative group (P <.0001). OS was 75% at 10 years and median not reached in the MRD-negative group, compared with only 35 months in the MRD-positive group (P <.0001). Of the 86 patients (47%) who remained in continuous molecular remission, 73% were still in clinical remission after 10 years. For all patients, the median time from ASCT to first molecular relapse was 55 months, with a continuous occurrence of late molecular relapses. Fifty-eight patients who experienced MRD relapse received rituximab as preemptive treatment on 1 or more occasions, and in this group, the median time from first molecular relapse to clinical relapse was 55 months. In most cases, rituximab converted patients to MRD negativity (87%), but many patients became MRD-positive again later during follow-up (69%). By multivariate analysis, high-risk Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score and positive MRD status pre-ASCT predicted early molecular relapse. In conclusion, preemptive rituximab treatment converts patients to MRD negativity and likely postpones clinical relapse. Molecular monitoring offers an opportunity to select some patients for therapeutic intervention and to avoid unnecessary treatment in others. MRD-positive patients in the first analysis post-ASCT have a dismal prognosis and thus are in need of novel strategies.
|
|
| 9. |
- Kolstad, Arne, et al.
(författare)
-
Nordic MCL-3 study : 90Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan added to BEAM/C in non-CR patients before transplant in mantle cell lymphoma
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Blood. - : American Society of Hematology. - 0006-4971 .- 1528-0020. ; 123:19, s. 2953-2959
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The main objective of the MCL3 study was to improve outcome for patients not in CR before transplant by adding (90)Y-ibritumomab-tiuxetan (Zevalin) to the high-dose regimen. 160 consecutive, untreated stage II-IV MCL patients < 66 years received rituximab (R)- maxi-CHOP alternating with R-high-dose Ara-C (6 cycles total), followed by high-dose BEAM or BEAC and autologous stem cell transplantation 2005-2009. Zevalin (0.4 mCi/kg) was given to responders in only CRu/PR prior to high-dose therapy. The overall response rate (ORR) pre-transplant was 97%. After a median follow-up of 4.4 years the outcome did not differ from that of the historic control, the MCL2 trial with the same treatment except for Zevalin. Overall (OS), event free (EFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 years were 78, 62 and 71%, respectively. For patients in CRu/PR before transplant who received Zevalin duration of response was shorter than in the CR group. Inferior PFS, EFS- and OS were predicted by PET-positivity pre-transplant and detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) before and after transplant. In conclusion, a positive PET prior to transplant and MRD are strong predictors of outcome. Late intensification with Zevalin may be too late to improve the outcome of patients not in CR before transplant.
|
|
| 10. |
- Pulczynski, Elisa Jacobsen, et al.
(författare)
-
Age-adjusted combined immunochemotherapy without radiotherapy in newly diagnosed PCNSL : A phase II trial of the Nordic Lymphoma Group
- 2011
-
Ingår i: 53rd ASH Anual Meeting and Exposition. ; , s. 696-696
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Patients and Methods: From May 2007 to October 2010, 66 newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) patients (M/F ratio 1:1) were enrolled. Younger patients (≤65 yrs; N=39) received 6 three-weekly cycles of chemotherapy consisting of: high-dose (HD)-methotrexate (MTX) (cycles 1, 2, 4 and 5), HD-cytosine arabinoside (AraC) (cycles 3 and 6) in addition to Rituximab (cycle 1 only), ifosfamide (cycles 1 and 4), cyclophosphamide (cycles 2 and 5), vincristine (cycles 2 and 5), vindesine (cycles 3 and 6), and dexamethasone (all 6 cycles). Depocyte® was delivered intratechally during the HD-MTX cycles. Elderly patients (66-75 yrs; N=27) received an identical Rituximab-containing 1st cycle. Cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide were replaced by temozolamide (cycles 2 to 6), which was also given as maintenance in patients with chemosensitive disease, and vincristine was omitted. No radiotherapy was given. Response was determined after the 2nd, 4th and 6thchemotherapy cycle by cerebral MRI and assessed according to International Primary CNS Lymphoma Coordinating Group criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), systemic toxicity and neurotoxicity assessed as Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Results: The median age was 64 yrs overall, 55 yrs (range 40-65) for younger and 70 yrs (range 66-75 years) for elderly patients. In 56 patients, the International Extranodal Lymphoma Study Group prognostic score was: 0-1 (N=5), 2-3 (N=36) and 4-5 (N=15). In the remaining 10 patients, lumbar puncture was not performed in five and spinal fluid protein concentration not reported in additional five cases. Response assessment after completion of induction treatment was performed in 43 out of 66 patients and showed complete remission (CR/CRu) in 30 patients, partial remission (PR) in 5 and progressive disease (PD) in 8. The ORR was 53 %. In 23 patients, response could not be evaluated due to early progression (n=8), toxic death (n=4), poor performance (n=3), neurotoxicity (n=5), or other causes (n=3). Of the 27 elderly patients, 15 continued to maintenance therapy. Of these, 14 have completed the maintenance schedule. Remission status at month 3 was CR in 13 and PD in 1 patient. With a median follow-up of 11.1 months (range 0.6-40.2) the 3-yr OS was 54.6% with no significant difference between younger and elderly patients (56.4% vs 51.9% respectively, p=0.32). The 3-yr PFS was 35.1% (32.9% in younger and 38.2 % in elderly patients; p=0.96). There were four septic deaths. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was seen in 79 % of the patients. Arachnoditis-like symptoms occurred in 13 patients. In all but two patients, the symptoms resolved within less than a week. MMSE and FIM were recorded both before and after therapy in 32 patients. Scores improved in 18 and 20 patients, respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, the schedule applied in the present study led to a 3 yr PFS of 35%. Surprisingly, no significant outcome difference was found between the younger and the elderly patients. The majority of treatment failures were due to early progressive disease under induction therapy. Although the follow-up of our study is short, de-escalation of induction treatment intensity by introduction of a less toxic agent as temozolomide, and its subsequent use in a maintenance schedule may explain a possible survival benefit of this strategy in elderly patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
|
|
