| 1. |
- Abd Nikooie Pour, Mina, et al.
(författare)
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2021
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Ontology Matching co-located with the 20th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2021), Virtual conference, October 25, 2021. - : CEUR-WS.org. ; , s. 62-108, s. 62-108
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus).The OAEI 2021 campaign offered 13 tracks and was attended by 21 participants.This paper is an overall presentation of that campaign.
|
|
| 2. |
- Abd Nikooie Pour, Mina, et al.
(författare)
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2023
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 18th International Workshop on Ontology Matching co-located with the 22nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2023), Athens, Greece, November 7, 2023.. - : CEUR Workshop Proceedings. ; , s. 97-139
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 3. |
- Abd Nikooie Pour, Mina, et al.
(författare)
-
Results of theOntology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2020
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 15th International Workshop on Ontology Matching. - Aachen, Germany : CEUR Workshop proceedings. ; , s. 92-138
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus).The OAEI 2020 campaign offered 12 tracks with 36 test cases, and was attended by 19 participants. This paper is an overall presentation of that campaign.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Achichi, Manel, et al.
(författare)
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2017
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Ontology Matching co-located with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017). - Aachen, Germany : CEUR Workshop Proceedings. ; , s. 61-113
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 6. |
- Algergawy, Alsayed, et al.
(författare)
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2018
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Ontology Matching. - Aachen, Germany : CEUR Workshop Proceedings. ; , s. 76-116
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation, open evaluation, or consensus). The OAEI 2018 campaign offered 12 tracks with 23 test cases, and was attended by 19 participants. This paper is an overall presentation of that campaign.
|
|
| 7. |
- Algergawy, Alsayed, et al.
(författare)
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2019
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Ontology Matchingco-located with the 18th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2019). - Aachen : CEUR Workshop Proceedings. ; , s. 46-85
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) aims at comparing ontology matching systems on precisely defined test cases. These test cases can be based on ontologies of different levels of complexity (from simple thesauri to expressive OWL ontologies) and use different evaluation modalities (e.g., blind evaluation,open evaluation, or consensus). The OAEI2019 campaign offered 11 tracks with 29 test cases, and was attended by 20 participants. This paper is an overall presentation of that campaign.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Dragisic, Zlatan, et al.
(författare)
-
User validation in ontology alignment
- 2016
-
Ingår i: The Semantic Web - ISWC 2016. - Cham, Switzerland : Springer Publishing Company. - 9783319465227 - 9783319465234 ; , s. 200-217
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- User validation is one of the challenges facing the ontology alignment community, as there are limits to the quality of automated alignment algorithms. In this paper we present a broad study on user validation of ontology alignments that encompasses three distinct but interrelated aspects: the profile of the user, the services of the alignment system, and its user interface. We discuss key issues pertaining to the alignment validation process under each of these aspects, and provide an overview of how current systems address them. Finally, we use experiments from the Interactive Matching track of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative (OAEI) 2015 to assess the impact of errors in alignment validation, and how systems cope with them as function of their services.
|
|
| 10. |
- Li, Huanyu, 1992-, et al.
(författare)
-
User validation in ontology alignment: functional assessment and impact
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Knowledge engineering review (Print). - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. - 0269-8889 .- 1469-8005. ; 34
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- User validation is one of the challenges facing the ontology alignment community, as there are limits to the quality of the alignments produced by automated alignment algorithms. In this paper, we present a broad study on user validation of ontology alignments that encompasses three distinct but inter-related aspects: the profile of the user, the services of the alignment system, and its user interface. We discuss key issues pertaining to the alignment validation process under each of these aspects and provide an overview of how current systems address them. Finally, we use experiments from the Interactive Matching track of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2015–2018 to assess the impact of errors in alignment validation, and how systems cope with them as function of their services.
|
|
