| 1. |
- Isacsson, Göran, et al.
(författare)
-
Use of bibloc and monobloc oral appliances in obstructive sleep apnoea : a multicentre, randomized, blinded, parallel-group equivalence trial
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Orthodontics. - : Oxford University Press. - 0141-5387 .- 1460-2210. ; 41:1, s. 80-88
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The clinical benefit of bibloc over monobloc appliances in treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) has not been evaluated in randomized trials. We hypothesized that the two types of appliances are equally effective in treating OSA.Objective: To compare the efficacy of monobloc versus bibloc appliances in a short-term perspective.Patients and methods: In this multicentre, randomized, blinded, controlled, parallel-group equivalence trial, patients with OSA were randomly assigned to use either a bibloc or a monobloc appliance. One-night respiratory polygraphy without respiratory support was performed at baseline, and participants were re-examined with the appliance in place at short-term follow-up. The primary outcome was the change in the apnoea-hypopnea index (AHI). An independent person prepared a randomization list and sealed envelopes. Evaluating dentist and the biomedical analysts who evaluated the polygraphy were blinded to the choice of therapy.Results: Of 302 patients, 146 were randomly assigned to use the bibloc and 156 the monobloc device; 123 and 139 patients, respectively, were analysed as per protocol. The mean changes in AHI were -13.8 (95% confidence interval -16.1 to -11.5) in the bibloc group and -12.5 (-14.8 to -10.3) in the monobloc group. The difference of -1.3 (-4.5 to 1.9) was significant within the equivalence interval (P = 0.011; the greater of the two P values) and was confirmed by the intention-to-treat analysis (P = 0.001). The adverse events were of mild character and were experienced by similar percentages of patients in both groups (39 and 40 per cent for the bibloc and monobloc group, respectively).Limitations: The study shows short-term results with a median time from commencing treatment to the evaluation visit of 56 days and long-term data on efficacy and harm are needed to be fully conclusive.Conclusion: In a short-term perspective, both appliances were equivalent in terms of their positive effects for treating OSA and caused adverse events of similar magnitude.Trial registration: Registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT02148510).
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Fodor, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Gender Differences in Quality of Life
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Quality of Life and Work in Europe Theory, Practice and Policy. - Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK : Palgrave Macmillan. - 9780230235113 ; , s. 149-161
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Isacsson, G., et al.
(författare)
-
Bibloc and Monobloc Oral appliances in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep apnoea : a Multicenter, Randomized, Blinded, Parallel-Group Trial
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Sleep Medicine. - : Elsevier. - 1389-9457 .- 1878-5506. ; 40:Suppl 1, s. E142-E143
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: The clinical benefit of bibloc over monobloc appliances has not been established in randomized trials treating obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). We hypothesized that the two types of appliances are equally effective in treating moderate to severe OSA. Materials and methods: We performed a blinded, multicenter, randomized, controlled, prospective, parallel-group trial including patients aged 18 years or older who had moderate-to-severe OSA. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a bibloc or a monobloc appliance with the intention to protrude the mandible 75% of the individual maximal protrusion capacity. At baseline a one-night respiratory polygraphy was done without any respiratory support. The polygraphy was iterated with the appliance in place at a 6-week follow-up. The primary outcome was the absolute change in the apnoea-hypopnea-index (AHI) from baseline to the 6-week follow-up, analysed in the per-protocol population. All patients who received an appliance were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02148510, and approved by Uppsala Regional Ethical Review Board, Sweden (#2014/021). Results: We recruited patients from three dental specialist clinics in Sweden; enrolment of 302 patients was done between March 2014 and April 2016; 146 randomized to bibloc and 156 to monobloc appliance. Twenty-three patients in the bibloc group and 17 in the monobloc group were withdrawn due to reasons like appliance could not be fitted, lack of compliance, adverse events or non-valid follow-up polygraphy i.e. a per-protocol group of 123 bibloc and 139 monobloc treated patients. The mean change of AHI from baseline to 6 weeks of treatment was -13.8 (95% CI -16.1 to -11.5; p < 0.001) in the bibloc group and -12.5 (95% CI -14.8 to -10.3; p < 0.001) in the monobloc group. The mean difference was not significant between the groups (-1.3 (95% CI -4.5 to 1.9). The most common adverse event in the orofacial region was upper airway infection followed by complains from various parts of the mouth, jaws and teeth. Conclusions: Bibloc and monobloc appliance treatment was equal in their effects in treating OSA as measured by at home polygraphic respiratory measures and the appliances were associated with a similar degree of adverse events. Acknowledgements: Funding from Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council and Vastmanland County Council, Sweden.
|
|
| 5. |
- Lonn, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Novel Approaches in Primary Cardiovascular Disease Prevention : The HOPE-3 Trial Rationale, Design, and Participants' Baseline Characteristics.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Canadian Journal of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0828-282X .- 1916-7075. ; 32:3, s. 311-318
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Cholesterol and blood pressure (BP) can be effectively and safely lowered with statin drugs and BP-lowering drugs, reducing major cardiovascular (CV) events by 20%-30% within 5 years in high-risk individuals. However, there are limited data in lower-risk populations. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation-3 (HOPE-3) trial is evaluating whether cholesterol lowering with a statin drug, BP lowering with low doses of 2 antihypertensive agents, and their combination safely reduce major CV events in individuals at intermediate risk who have had no previous vascular events and have average cholesterol and BP levels.METHODS: A total of 12,705 women 65 years or older and men 55 years or older with at least 1 CV risk factor, no known CV disease, and without any clear indication or contraindication to the study drugs were randomized to rosuvastatin 10 mg/d or placebo and to candesartan/hydrochlorothiazide 16/12.5 mg/d or placebo (2 × 2 factorial design) and will be followed for a mean of 5.8 years. The coprimary study outcomes are the composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke and the composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke, resuscitated cardiac arrest, heart failure, and arterial revascularization.RESULTS: Participants were recruited from 21 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Mean age at randomization was 66 years and 46% were women.CONCLUSIONS: The HOPE-3 trial will provide new information on cholesterol and BP lowering in intermediate-risk populations with average cholesterol and BP levels and is expected to inform approaches to primary prevention worldwide.
|
|
| 6. |
- Mann, Johannes F. E., et al.
(författare)
-
Homocysteine lowering with folic acid and B vitamins in people with chronic kidney disease : results of the renal Hope-2 study
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0931-0509 .- 1460-2385. ; 23:2, s. 645-653
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Elevated plasma homocysteine levels are reported to be associated with higher rates of vascular diseases. Plasma homocysteine increases in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and could contribute to the increased cardiovascular risk in CKD. METHODS: Participants aged 55 years or older with CKD, defined as estimated GFR<60 ml/min and at high cardiovascular risk, were randomly assigned to the combination of folic acid, 2.5 mg, vitamin B6, 50 mg and vitamin B12, 1 mg (n = 307) or placebo (n = 312) daily for 5 years. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction and stroke. RESULTS: Mean baseline plasma homocysteine was 15.9 +/- 7.3 micromol/l in the active treatment group and 15.7 +/- 5.7 micromol/l in placebo group and decreased to 11.9 +/- 3.3 micromol/l (P < 0.001) on active treatment (15.5 +/- 4.5 on placebo). Primary outcome events occurred in 90 participants (29.3%) on active therapy and in 80 (25.6%) on placebo (relative risk, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.61; P = 0.25). There were no significant treatment benefits on death from cardiovascular causes (1.24; 0.84-1.83), myocardial infarction (1.10; 0.76-1.61) and stroke (1.00; 0.54-1.85). More participants in the active treatment group were hospitalized for heart failure (1.98; 1.21-3.26; P = 0.007) and for unstable angina (1.70; 1.02-2.83; P = 0.04). Incidence of primary outcome increased with decreasing GFR. CONCLUSIONS: Active treatment with B vitamins lowered homocysteine levels in participants with CKD but did not reduce cardiovascular risk.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Oertelt-Prigione, Sabine, et al.
(författare)
-
COVID-19 impact on gender equality in research & innovation – Policy report : Independent expert report
- 2023
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- This report presents the findings of the European Commission’s Expert Group on the COVID-19 impact on gender equality in Research and Innovation (R&I). The report highlights in particular the pandemic’s gendered impact on academic productivity, early career researchers, and work-life balance. It investigates institutional responses and aims to bring forward unseen and marginalised experiences in academia. The recommendations are intended for R&I policymakers at national and EU-level, research funding organisations and research performing organisations. They present an opportunity for Member States and R&I organisations to apply the lessons learnt from the pandemic to the development of inclusive gender equality policies in the European Research Area (ERA).
|
|
| 9. |
- Proletov, Ian, et al.
(författare)
-
Primary and secondary glomerulonephritides 1.
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1460-2385. ; 29 Suppl 3:May, s. 186-200
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
