| 1. |
- Alexeyenko, Andrey, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparative interactomics with Funcoup 2.0
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Nucleic Acids Research. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0305-1048 .- 1362-4962. ; 40:D1, s. D821-D828
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- FunCoup (http://FunCoup.sbc.su.se) is a database that maintains and visualizes global gene/protein networks of functional coupling that have been constructed by Bayesian integration of diverse high-throughput data. FunCoup achieves high coverage by orthology-based integration of data sources from different model organisms and from different platforms. We here present release 2.0 in which the data sources have been updated and the methodology has been refined. It contains a new data type Genetic Interaction, and three new species: chicken, dog and zebra fish. As FunCoup extensively transfers functional coupling information between species, the new input datasets have considerably improved both coverage and quality of the networks. The number of high-confidence network links has increased dramatically. For instance, the human network has more than eight times as many links above confidence 0.5 as the previous release. FunCoup provides facilities for analysing the conservation of subnetworks in multiple species. We here explain how to do comparative interactomics on the FunCoup website.
|
|
| 2. |
- Frings, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
The Vision Correction Questionnaire : an electronic patient-reported outcome measure for refractive surgery
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 1873-4502 .- 0886-3350. ; 48:12, s. 1427-1432
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: To develop a psychometrically robust electronic patient reported outcome measure (ePROM) for refractive surgery. SETTING: Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Questionnaire development study. METHODS: Items were derived in 6 domains (spectacle dependence, visual quality, eye comfort, functional freedom, emotional wellbeing, and satisfaction with treatment) from existing Rasch adjusted instruments, patient and surgeon feedback, and refinement in semistructured interviews before administration to a field test cohort (n = 360) of patients undergoing routine refractive surgery. Spectacle dependence and satisfaction with treatment items were used to provide descriptive statistical information only. Contemporary criteria for item reduction and Rasch modeling were applied to the remaining domains. The finalized questionnaire was then administered to a second patient cohort (n = 120) before and after surgery to assess sensitivity to change. RESULTS: A 5-item scale derived for emotional wellbeing was unidimensional and a good fit to the Rasch model with ordered category response profiles, adequate precision (person separation 2.22 logits, reliability coefficient 0.83), and no misfitting items. Mean logit scores were 0.91 higher after treatment (effect size 1.26) suggesting a positive impact on emotional wellbeing. Functional scales could not be derived for visual quality, eye comfort, or functional freedom. Single-item ratings for visual quality and eye comfort were retained in our final 11-item questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: This short ePROM should integrate well with routine clinical care and clinical trials in refractive surgery. The Rasch adjusted emotional wellbeing scale may help quantify the way patients feel about refractive surgery, with the remaining items providing useful descriptive information.
|
|
| 3. |
- van der Beek, Allard, et al.
(författare)
-
A research framework for the development and implementation of interventions preventing work-related musculoskeletal disorders
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. - : Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health. - 0355-3140 .- 1795-990X. ; 43:6, s. 526-539
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are highly prevalent and put a large burden on the (working) society. Primary prevention of work-related MSD focuses often on physical risk factors (such as on manual lifting and awkward postures), but has not been too successful in reducing the MSD burden. This may partly be caused by insufficient knowledge of etiological mechanisms and/or a lack of adequately feasible interventions (theory failure and program failure, respectively), possibly due to limited integration of research disciplines. A research framework could link research disciplines thereby strengthening the development and implementation of preventive interventions. Our objective was to define and describe such a framework for multi-disciplinary research on work-related MSD prevention.Methods: We described a framework for MSD prevention research, partly based on frameworks from other research fields (i.e., sports injury prevention and public health).Results: The framework is composed of a repeated sequence of six steps comprising the assessment of 1) incidence and severity of MSD, 2) risk factors for MSD, and 3) underlying mechanisms; and the 4) development, 5) evaluation, and 6) implementation of preventive intervention(s).Conclusions: In the present framework for optimal work-related MSD prevention, research disciplines are linked. This framework can thereby help to improve theories and strengthen the development and implementation of prevention strategies for work-related MSD.
|
|
