| 1. |
- Gleisner, Jenny, Fil. dr. 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
Approaching distressing or sensitive topics in medical school
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Medical Education. - : John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. - 0308-0110 .- 1365-2923. ; 55:11, s. 1221-1222
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The authors encourage a continuous attentiveness to thinking and caring about the challenges medical students will encounter during sensitive discussions.
|
|
| 2. |
- Gleisner, Jenny, Fil. dr. 1982-
(författare)
-
Between Standards and Voluntariness : Midwives’ Alignment Work in Antenatal Care
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Science & Technology Studies. - : Finnish Society for Science and Technology Studies. - 2243-4690. ; 36:4, s. 26-42
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Antenatal care in Sweden is voluntary but offered to all pregnant persons. It is organised in accordance with a standardised programme where midwives do pregnancy check-ups and inform about pregnancy, childbirth and becoming parents. But a standardised programme can be difficult to apply to the varying individuals’ wants and needs.Through interviews with midwives and observation of parental education, the article attends to the tension that arises between standards and voluntariness in antenatal care and the often-invisible alignment work done by midwives to make knowledge attractive and palatable to parents-to-be. It does so by showing that the recipients wanting the knowledge becomes important for it to be moved with stability and integrity without losing meaning. The article contributes to ongoing discussions about how scientific knowledge is turned into practice by elucidating the affective dimensions of alignment work and how feelings may facilitate or hinder the movement of knowledge.
|
|
| 3. |
- Gleisner, Jenny, Fil. dr. 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
Caring for affective subjects produced in intimate healthcare examinations
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Health. - : Sage Publications. - 1363-4593 .- 1461-7196. ; 27:3, s. 302-322
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article is about the feelings – affect – induced by the digital rectal exam of theprostate and the gynaecological bimanual pelvic exam, and the care doctors are orare not instructed to give. The exams are both invasive, intimate exams located ata part of the body often charged with norms and emotions related to gender andsexuality. By using the concept affective subject, we analyse how these examinations aretaught to medical students, bringing attention to how bodies and affect are cared foras patients are observed and touched. Our findings show both the role care practicesplay in generating and handling affect in the students’ learning and the importance ofthe affect that the exam is (or is not) imagined to produce in the patient. Ours is amaterial-discursive analysis that includes the material affordances of the patient anddoctor bodies in the affective work spaces observed.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Gleisner, Jenny, Fil. dr. 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
Differences in teaching female and male intimate examinations : A qualitative study
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Medical Education. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0308-0110 .- 1365-2923. ; 54:4, s. 348-355
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ContextTeaching intimate examinations to medical students has been recognised as difficult because of the anxious feelings that the students may experience. For their professional development, previously incorporated understandings need to be relearned: how to transgress boundaries that regulate intimacy and physical closeness, learning to examine and touch other peoples' bodies, and talking about things that are otherwise taboo.ObjectivesThis paper compares how students learn to perform two intimate examinations: (i) the digital rectal examination (DRE) of the prostate, and (ii) the bimanual pelvic examination (PE) and analyses how norms and expectations affect how students learn to approach them.MethodsThis study is based on ethnographic work: in‐depth qualitative interviews with two urologists and nine medical students in semesters four, eight and 11 of a medical education programme in Sweden, observations of three learning sessions where 16 students performed the PE on professional patients, and 2 days of observations at a urology outpatient clinic.ResultsThe educational approach to the PE and DRE differ. The PE is taught as sensitive and to be handled with care, using a well‐documented learning concept including interpersonal and technical skills. The patient's exposed position in the gynaecological chair, possible previous negative experiences of PE or sexual exploitation are taken into account. In contrast, there is no educational concept for teaching the DRE. The students perform their first DRE on a clinical patient. The DRE is also handled with care, but with less sensitivity. The patients' possible previous negative experiences are not discussed and are thus made invisible.ConclusionsWell‐established routines in performing the PE help doctors and students to be attentive to patients' emotions and previous experiences, and remind them to perceive the examination as sensitive. Aligning the teaching of the DRE with that of the PE will improve how the male prostate patient is approached.
|
|
| 6. |
- Gleisner, Jenny, Fil. dr. 1982-
(författare)
-
Ett frivilligt föräldrastöd för alla?
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Jordemodern. - Stockholm : Jordemodern Svenska Barnmorskeförbundet. - 0021-7468. ; :5, s. 11-13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (populärvet., debatt m.m.)
|
|
| 7. |
- Gleisner, Jenny, Fil. dr. 1982-
(författare)
-
Prostataundersökningen och den (o)känslige mannen
- 2018. - 1
-
Ingår i: Prostatan - det ständiga gisslet?. - Lund : Nordic Academic Press. - 9789188661630 ; , s. 43-58
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Vissa undersökningssituationer kan upplevas som intima och känsliga, både för läkaren och för patienten. Prostataundersökningen är en sådan situation. Från det medicinska perspektivet lyfts dock inte alltid prostataundersökningen fram som särskilt känslig, utan kan behandlas som vilken rutinkontroll som helst. Denna inställning påverkar hur läkarstudenter får lära sig att utföra prostataundersökningar. I detta kapitel visar jag vad som kan förändras och göras annorlunda genom att kontrastera med den gynekologiska undersökningen – en annan kroppsligt intim situation som har mycket gemensamt med prostataundersökningen men som lärs ut på andra sätt.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
