| 1. |
- Gohritz, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Rekonstruktion der aktiven Ellbogenbeugung durch bipolare Transposition des Musculus latissimus dorsi : [Restoration of active elbow flexion by muscle transfer of the latissimus dorsi]
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Operative Orthopädie und Traumatologie. - 0934-6694. ; 21:2, s. 115-25
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: Reconstruction of active elbow flexion against gravity (strength grade > or =M(3)) by transfer of the latissimus dorsi muscle in order to improve the functionality of the upper extremity. INDICATIONS: Irreparable lesions of the musculocutaneous nerve (C(5)/6). Failure of regeneration after peripheral nerve reconstruction for the musculocutaneous nerve (neurolysis, suture, nerve grafting). Brachial plexus injury (lesions to the upper part, C(5)/6). Loss of biceps function due to trauma, ischemia, poliomyelitis or tumor. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Possible recovery of biceps function by reinnervation, spontaneously or after nerve reconstruction. Weakness of the latissimus dorsi muscle (strength grade < M(4)). Insufficient passive range of motion of the elbow joint (osteoarthritis, contracture). Lack of motivation, reliability, and cooperation of the patient in postoperative rehabilitation program. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: The intact latissimus dorsi muscle is transferred with its origin and insertion ventrally and sutured with its thoracic aponeurosis into the insertion of the biceps tendon in order to act as an elbow flexor. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Following postoperative immobilization in an upper-arm Gilchrist bandage at 100 degrees flexion and supination (or neutral position, but not pronation) of the forearm for 6 weeks, passive motion exercises of the elbow are started. Active flexion and extension exercises begin at 8-10 weeks postoperatively. To prevent the deleterious effect of muscle and tendon elongation, an orthosis is used during the night to keep the elbow flexed at 90 degrees for 6 months. RESULTS: According to the authors' experience and the results reported in the literature, bipolar latissimus dorsi muscle transfer is a reliable method to restore functional elbow flexion regarding range of motion (> 90 degrees elbow flexion) and strength (at least antigravity strength, > or =M(3)) with acceptable donor morbidity and complication rate.
|
|
| 2. |
- Fridén, Jan, 1953, et al.
(författare)
-
Simultaneous powering of forearm pronation and key pinch in tetraplegia using a single muscle-tendon unit.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: The Journal of hand surgery, European volume. - 2043-6289. ; 37:4, s. 323-328
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study clinically assessed the concept that both thumb flexion and forearm pronation can be restored by brachioradialis (BR)-to-flexor pollicis longus (FPL) tendon transfer if the BR is passed dorsal to the radius. Six patients [two women and four men, mean age 32.3 years (SD 4.9, range 23-56)] underwent BR-to-FPL transfer dorsal to the radius and through the interosseous membrane (IOM). Lateral key pinch strength and pronation range of motion (ROM) were measured 1 year after surgery. A group of six patients [two women and four men, mean age 31.2 years (SD 5.0, range 19-52)] who underwent traditional palmar BR-to-FPL was included for comparison. Postoperative active pronation was significantly greater in the dorsal transfer group compared to the palmar group [149 (SD 6) and 75 (SD 3), respectively] and pinch strength was similar in the two groups [1.28 (SD 0.16) kg and 1.20 (SD0.21) kg, respectively]. We conclude that it is feasible to reconstruct lateral key pinch and forearm pronation simultaneously using only the BR motor.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Gohritz, A, et al.
(författare)
-
Ersatzoperationen bei Ausfall motorisher Funktionen an der Hand : Tendon transposition to restore muscle function in the hand
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Der Unfallchirurg. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0177-5537 .- 1433-044X. ; 110:9, s. 759-76
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Nerve injuries in the upper extremity can result in severe disability. In the last three decades, progress in microsurgical techniques has improved the outcome for nerve injuries and if the prognosis is reasonably good, nerve repair should usually be performed prior to tendon transfer procedures. However, above all proximal lesions of peripheral nerves such as high radial nerve palsy still often yield unsatisfactory results, despite a technically well-executed nerve repair. Prognosis further depends on the time interval since the injury and also on the age of the patient, as the regenerative process is delayed in older patients. The indication for tendon transfers strongly depends on the personal and professional profiles of the individual patient. Tendon transfer procedures alleviate the suffering from functional hand impairment providing a superior alternative to permanent external splints. Tendon transfers are usually secondary procedures for replacing function after evaluation of the functional motor loss. Numerous transfer procedures have been described for every nerve trunk of the upper extremity, their prognosis depending mainly on the extent and pattern of nerve loss, local effects of the trauma (e.g. involvement of soft tissues, joints), and the physiological characteristics of the transferred muscle. Even if the results of the tendon transfers may finally be less satisfactory in cases of complex nerve damage than in isolated motor nerve lesions, they offer a valuable functional benefit, often being the only possibility to restore hand function. Although regrettably underused, tendon transfer improve upper extremity function in more than 70% of patients with cervical spinal cord injury. Reconstruction of key elements such as wrist extension, key grip between the thumb and the index finger, or digital flexion and extension leads to highly improved use of the tetraplegic hand and thus provides new mobility and independence from the help of others. This article presents an overview of the most common procedures to restore hand function in peripheral nerve injuries and tetraplegia in order to provide a systematic approach for decision making.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Gohritz, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Management of Spinal Cord Injury-Induced Upper Extremity Spasticity
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Hand Clinics. - : Elsevier BV. - 0749-0712. ; 34:4, s. 555-65
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Spasticity affects more than 80% of patients with spinal cord injury. Neural mechanisms and musculotendinous alterations lead to typical upper extremity features including shoulder adduction/internal rotation, forearm pronation, and elbow, wrist, and finger flexion. Long-standing spasticity may lead to soft tissue and joint contractures and further impairment of upper extremity function. Surgical management involves tendon lengthening, release, and transfer, as well as selective neurotomy, in an effort to reduce spastic muscle hypertonicity, restore balance, prevent further contracture, and improve posture and function. This article summarizes surgical strategies to improve function of the upper extremity in patients with tetraplegia.
|
|
| 8. |
- Gohritz, A., et al.
(författare)
-
[Nerve and muscle transfer surgery to restore paralyzed elbow function]
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Unfallchirurg. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0177-5537. ; 111:2, s. 85-101
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Paralysis of elbow flexion or extension leads to major impairment of upper extremity function. Surgical reconstruction can be achieved using several procedures.If the time interval since the nerve injury is short, anatomic reconstruction by means of nerve suture or nerve transplantation should be attempted. Alternatively, nerve transposition is possible. If more than 12-18 months have elapsed, reinnervation of arm muscles can no longer be expected. In this case, muscle transposition is helpful. Restoring flexion is predominantly required following brachial plexus injury, when the function of the biceps, brachioradialis and brachialis muscles are lost. As donor muscles the latissimus dorsi, pectoralis major and triceps brachii can be used, alternatively a transfer of the flexor-pronator muscles of the forearm is possible. Latissimus dorsi transfer to reconstruct elbow flexion is also indicated in defects of the anterior upper arm muscle compartiment due to trauma, ischemia, or tumor. Patients with proximal radial nerve lesions may benefit from latissimus transfer to reachieve elbow flexion extension.In tetraplegic patients, elbow extension is restored mainly by transfer of the posterior deltoid muscle extended with a tendon graft, or by means of a biceps-to-triceps transfer.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
