SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Griffiths LJ) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Griffiths LJ)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 485
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Kanai, M, et al. (författare)
  • 2023
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  • Niemi, MEK, et al. (författare)
  • 2021
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  • Thomas, HS, et al. (författare)
  • 2019
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
6.
  • Glasbey, JC, et al. (författare)
  • 2021
  • swepub:Mat__t
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  • Clark, DW, et al. (författare)
  • Associations of autozygosity with a broad range of human phenotypes
  • 2019
  • Ingår i: Nature communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2041-1723. ; 10:1, s. 4957-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In many species, the offspring of related parents suffer reduced reproductive success, a phenomenon known as inbreeding depression. In humans, the importance of this effect has remained unclear, partly because reproduction between close relatives is both rare and frequently associated with confounding social factors. Here, using genomic inbreeding coefficients (FROH) for >1.4 million individuals, we show that FROH is significantly associated (p < 0.0005) with apparently deleterious changes in 32 out of 100 traits analysed. These changes are associated with runs of homozygosity (ROH), but not with common variant homozygosity, suggesting that genetic variants associated with inbreeding depression are predominantly rare. The effect on fertility is striking: FROH equivalent to the offspring of first cousins is associated with a 55% decrease [95% CI 44–66%] in the odds of having children. Finally, the effects of FROH are confirmed within full-sibling pairs, where the variation in FROH is independent of all environmental confounding.
  •  
10.
  • Gould, LJ, et al. (författare)
  • Compassionate care intervention for hospital nursing teams caring for older people: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 8:2, s. e018563-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Compassionate care continues to be a focus for national and international attention, but the existing evidence base lacks the experimental methodology necessary to guide the selection of effective interventions for practice. This study aimed to evaluate the Creating Learning Environments for Compassionate Care (CLECC) intervention in improving compassionate care.SettingWard nursing teams (clusters) in two English National Health Service hospitals randomised to intervention (n=4) or control (n=2). Intervention wards comprised two medicines for older people (MOPs) wards and two medical/surgical wards. Control wards were both MOPs.ParticipantsData collected from 627 patients and 178 staff. Exclusion criteria: reverse barrier nursed, critically ill, palliative or non-English speaking. All other patients and all nursing staff and Health Care Assistant HCAs were invited to participant, agency and bank staff were excluded.InterventionCLECC, a workplace intervention focused on developing sustainable leadership and work-team practices to support the delivery of compassionate care. Control: No educational activity.Primary and secondary outcome measuresPrimary—Quality of Interaction Schedule (QuIS) for observed staff–patient interactions. Secondary—patient-reported evaluations of emotional care in hospital (PEECH); nurse-reported empathy (Jefferson Scale of Empathy).ResultsTrial proceeded as per protocol, randomisation was acceptable. Some but not all blinding strategies were successful. QuIS observations achieved 93% recruitment rate with 25% of patient sample cognitively impaired. At follow-up there were more total positive (78% vs 74%) and less total negative (8% vs 11%) QuIS ratings for intervention wards versus control wards. Sixty-three per cent of intervention ward patients scored lowest (ie, more negative) scores on PEECH connection subscale, versus 79% of control. This was not a statistically significant difference. No statistically significant differences in nursing empathy were observed.ConclusionsUse of experimental methods is feasible. The use of structured observation of staff–patient interaction quality is a promising outcome measure inclusive of hard to reach groups.Trial registration numberISRCTN16789770.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 485

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy