| 1. |
- Lindahl, Marcus, 1973-, et al.
(författare)
-
The Ghosts of Shared Leadership: On Decision-Making and Subconscious Followership in the Death Zone of K2
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Extreme Leadership: Leaders, Teams and Situations Outside the Norm. - : Edward Elgar Publishing.
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Extreme environments are characterized in part by the romance and mystique ascribed to them, something that goes for leadership as well. Whereas the mystique of the former is connected to the perception of danger and risk, both have connections to transcending the mundane, heroism and the challenge and character of the self. Extreme environments would thus be highly likely to bring out extreme perceptions of leadership as well, including but not limited to attempted heroics and confusing risk-taking with leadership. In addition to this, ...
|
|
| 2. |
- Bergman Ärlebäck, Jonas, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
IPAs - ihopparningsaktiviteter : aktiviteter med låg tröskel som tränar elevers begrepps-, procedur-/ metod- och resonemangsförmåga
- 2017
-
Rapport (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Syftet med denna rapport är att på ett beskrivande sätt delge hur arbetet i projektet om IPAs som genomförts HT2014 – VT2015 gått till och vilka erfarenheter och slutsatser som arbetet resulterat i. Den tänkte läsaren är framför allt kommunernas matematiklärare, men vi tror även att andra lärare och skolpersonal kan finna innehållet intressant och användbart. Det är vår förhoppning att rapporten med tillhörande aktiviteter kan inspirera till reflektion och en mer varierad undervisning. När pronomen som vi och oss används i rapporten åsyftats alla som aktivt ingått i IPAprojektets forskande grupp, vilken har bestått av såväl deltagande lärare som forskare:Marcus Claesson (Kungsgårdsgymnasiet, Norrköping), Malin Hällgren (Birgittaskolans vuxenutbildning, Linköping), Sofia Lindh (Hagagymnasiet, Norrköping), Mia Lundell (Djäkneparksskolan, Norrköping), Mattias Nordling (Anders Ljungstedska gymnasiet, Linköping) och Jonas Bergman Ärlebäck (LiU). Huvudansvaret för författandet av rapporten har Jonas haft som medverkande forskare i projektet. De medforskande lärarna har bidragit med analyser, erfarenheter och exempel från sina klassrum, utvecklat, testat och formulerat aktiviteterna som utgjort navet i projektet, samt läst och kommenterat rapporten under dess framställning.Rapporten följer samma logik och uppbyggnad som de rapporter skrivna inom det övergripande samarbetsprojektet Matematikdidaktik för bättre matematikkunskaper av det arbete och den forskning som bedrivits av Lisa Björklund Boistrup (Björklund Boistrup et al. 2013a; 2013b; 2013c; 2014a; 2014b). Vissa delar av texten använder därför, eller bygger till viss del på, Lisas texter, och när så är fallet tydliggörs detta med fotnoter. Andra delar av texten, så som exempelvis beskrivningen av de teoretiska utgångspunkterna, är i stort identiskt i samtliga delprojektsrapporter för de projekt som Jonas medverkat i som forskare (Ärlebäck et. al. 2017a, 2017b, 2017c, 2017d). Rapporten är dock skriven för att kunna läsas helt fristående från de andra rapporterna författade i projektet och förutsätter med andra ord ingen tidigare kunskap eller kännedom om projektet och de perspektiv som används. De läsare som redan tagit del av arbetet inom samarbetsprojektet Matematikdidaktik för bättre matematikkunskaper på olika sätt kommer här och var att känna igen sig, men vi hoppas att de delar som är unikt specifika för just detta delprojekt ska vara intressant och inspirerande.
|
|
| 3. |
- Hällgren, Markus, et al.
(författare)
-
Coping with lack of authority : Extending research on project governance with a practice approach
- 2017
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald. - : EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD. - 1753-8378 .- 1753-8386. ; 10:2, s. 244-262
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to identify and explore alternative coping strategies that may compensate for the limitations of weak governance structure in a product development project.Design/methodology/approach - The findings are based on a single case study, including interviews and documents, of a product development project that consists of two interlinked projects in a large multinational company.Findings - Two distinct procedures are identified to cope and manage effectively when there are weak project governance structures. The first procedure is a horizontal process of operational consensus-seeking where conflicts between projects are negotiated and resolved through communication between independent actors such as two project managers who are at the same hierarchical level within the same organization. The second process is a vertical process of strategic escalation where issues that have failed to be resolved are shifted upwards to a new hierarchical level where a new round of operational consensus-seeking is attempted.Research limitations/implications - This paper complements the existing understanding of project governance with a project-as-practice perspective. Based on the findings the authors suggest that project governance needs to be nuanced in its understanding since a too-structured approach may in fact increase tensions in an organization.Practical implications - Practical insights include how organizations may work with its project governance structures in order to avoid tensions. The authors suggest that, in particular, politically sensitive situations may be avoided by weak rather than strong governance structures.Social implications - The authors find that weak governance structures may be efficient for the organization, but harmful to personnel, who become too focused on the task at hand.Originality/value - To the best of the authors' knowledge very little research has been attributed to project governance from a practice approach. Moreover, most attention has been given to strong structures, thereby not examining the positive implications of weak structures.
|
|
| 4. |
- Hällgren, Markus, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
How do you do? : On situating old project sites through practice-based studies
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald. - : Emerald Group Publishing Limited. - 1753-8378 .- 1753-8386. ; 5:3, s. 335-344
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose – The purpose of this editorial is to reflect on the growing interest of situated project research.Design/methodology/approach – The editorial is conceptual and relies on published work and the articles included in the special issue.Findings – With this special issue it is found that practice-based studies, also called Projects-as-Practice studies, interested in the everyday activities of project practitioners, are multi-faceted and rich. What may also be seen is that practice-based studies are not yet a coherent area. However, it is more important that practice-based studies allow researchers to understand the organization less as an entity and more as a socially-accomplished task.Research limitations/implications – Several implications for research are offered, including the need for studies that emphasize the small details of organizing, and that practice-based studies are not restricted to a certain methodology but depend on what a particular paper tries to accomplish.Practical implications – With an ever-growing stream of research focusing on projects the guest editors argue that it is about time to look into the details of organizing. This could be accomplished through a number of ways but in this special issue it is proposed that approaching traditional areas with a conscious naivety when asking the questions may do it. For the practitioner, the special issue offers important insights into how things are done in practice, which may be used as a mirror or reflection upon their own practice.Originality/value – This editorial and special issue offer insights for any academic interested in understanding projects differently.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hällgren, Markus, et al.
(författare)
-
How do you do? On situating old project sites through practice-based studies : On situating old project sites through practice-based studies
- 2012
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Managing Projects in Business/Emerald. - : Emerald. - 1753-8378 .- 1753-8386. ; 5:3, s. 335-344
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AbstractPurpose – The purpose of this editorial is to reflect on the growing interest of situated project research. Design/methodology/approach – The editorial is conceptual and relies on published work and the articles included in the special issue.Findings – With this special issue it is found that practice-based studies, also called Projects-as-Practice studies, interested in the everyday activities of project practitioners, are multi-faceted and rich. What may also be seen is that practice-based studies are not yet a coherent area. However, it is more important that practice-based studies allow researchers to understand the organization less as an entity and more as a socially-accomplished task.Research limitations/implications – Several implications for research are offered, including the need for studies that emphasize the small details of organizing, and that practice-based studies are not restricted to a certain methodology but depend on what a particular paper tries to accomplish. Practical implications – With an ever-growing stream of research focusing on projects the guest editors argue that it is about time to look into the details of organizing. This could be accomplished through a number of ways but in this special issue it is proposed that approaching traditional areas with a conscious naivety when asking the questions may do it. For the practitioner, the special issue offers important insights into how things are done in practice, which may be used as a mirror or reflection upon their own practice.Originality/value – This editorial and special issue offer insights for any academic interested in understanding projects differently.Keywords Project management, Research work, Organizations, Situation analysis, Projects as practice, Practice based studies, Situatedness, ContextualisationPaper type Conceptual paper
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
