| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Braun, Oscar Ö., et al.
(författare)
-
Continuous-flow LVADs in the Nordic countries : complications and mortality and its predictors
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1401-7431 .- 1651-2006. ; 53:1, s. 14-20
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess complications and mortality and its predictors, with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) in the Nordic Countries.Design: This was a retrospective, international, multicenter cohort study.Results: Between 1993 and 2013, 442 surgically implanted long-term mechanical assist devices were used among 8 centers in the Nordic countries. Of those, 238 were CF-LVADs (HVAD or HeartMate II) implanted in patients >18 years with complete data. Postoperative complications and survival were compared and Cox proportion hazard regression analysis was used to identify predictors of mortality. The overall Kaplan-Meier survival rate was 75% at 1 year, 69% at 2 years and 63% at 3 years. A planned strategy of destination therapy had poorer survival compared to a strategy of bridge to transplantation or decision (2-year survival of 41% vs. 76%, p < .001). The most common complications were non-driveline infections (excluding sepsis) (44%), driveline infection (27%), need for continuous renal replacement therapy (25%) and right heart failure (24%). In a multivariate model age and left ventricular diastolic dimension was left as independent risk factors for mortality with a hazard ratio of 1.35 (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.01-1.80], p = .046) per 10 years and 0.88 (95% CI [0.72-0.99], p = .044) per 5 mm, respectively.Conclusion: Outcome with CF LVAD in the Nordic countries was comparable to other cohorts. Higher age and destination therapy require particularly stringent selection.
|
|
| 3. |
- Karason, Kristjan, 1962, et al.
(författare)
-
Randomized trial of a left ventricular assist device as destination therapy versus guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with advanced heart failure. Rationale and design of the SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) trial
- 2020
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 22:2, s. 739-50
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims Patients with advanced heart failure (AdHF) who are ineligible for heart transplantation (HTx) can become candidates for treatment with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in some countries, but not others. This reflects the lack of a systematic analysis of the usefulness of LVAD systems in this context, and of their benefits, limitations and cost-effectiveness. The SWEdish evaluation of left Ventricular Assist Device (SweVAD) study is a Phase IV, prospective, 1:1 randomized, non-blinded, multicentre trial that will examine the impact of assignment to mechanical circulatory support with guideline-directed LVAD destination therapy (GD-LVAD-DT) using the HeartMate 3 (HM3) continuous flow pump vs. guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on survival in a population of AdHF patients ineligible for HTx. Methods A total of 80 patients will be recruited to SweVAD at the seven university hospitals in Sweden. The study population will comprise patients with AdHF (New York Heart Association class IIIB-IV, INTERMACS profile 2-6) who display signs of poor prognosis despite GDMT and who are not considered eligible for HTx. Participants will be followed for 2 years or until death occurs. Other endpoints will be determined by blinded adjudication. Patients who remain on study-assigned interventions beyond 2 years will be asked to continue follow-up for outcomes and adverse events for up to 5 years. Conclusion The SweVAD study will compare survival, medium-term benefits, costs and potential hazards between GD-LVAD-DT and GDMT and will provide a valuable reference point to guide destination therapy strategies for patients with AdHF ineligible for HTx.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Altena, Renske, et al.
(författare)
-
Evidence-based prediction and prevention of cardiovascular morbidity in adults treated for cancer
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Cardio-Oncology. - : BMC. - 2057-3804. ; 7:1
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Cancer treatment-related morbidity relevantly compromises health status in cancer survivors, and efforts to optimise health-related outcomes in this population are vital to maximising healthy survivorship. A pre-treatment assessment - and possibly preventive management strategies - of cancer patients at increased risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) seems a rational approach in this regard. Definitive evidence for such strategies is largely lacking, thereby impeding the formulation of firm recommendations. Results The current scoping review aims to summarise and grade the evidence regarding strategies for prediction and prevention of CVD in adults in relation to oncological treatments. We conducted a scoping literature search for different strategies for primary prevention, such as medical and lifestyle interventions, as well as the use of predictive risk scores. We identified studies with moderate to good strength and up to now limited evidence to recommend primary preventive strategies in unselected patients treated with potentially cardiotoxic oncologic therapies. Conclusion Efforts to minimize the CVD burden in cancer survivors are needed to accomplish healthy survivorship. This can be done by means of robust models predictive for CVD events or application of interventions during or after oncological treatments. Up to now there is insufficient evidence to implement preventive strategies in an unselected group of patients treated with potential cardiotoxic oncological treatments. We conclude that randomised controlled trials are needed that evaluate medical and lifestyle interventions in groups at increased risk for complications, in order to be able to influence chronic illness risks, such as cardiovascular complications, for cancer survivors.
|
|
| 7. |
- Broström, Anders, 1963-, et al.
(författare)
-
Effects of Long-term Nocturnal Oxygen Treatment in Patients With Severe Heart Failure
- 2005
-
Ingår i: Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. - Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0889-4655 .- 1550-5049. ; 20:6, s. 385-395
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and leads to disturbed sleep. The objective of this study was to determine the persistent effects of long-term nocturnal oxygen treatment in patients with severe HF regarding (1) objective outcomes, such as steep. SDB, cardiac function, and functional capacity; (2) subjective outcomes, such as self-assessed sleep difficulties, daytime sleepiness, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL); and (3) the relationship between objective and subjective outcomes. In this open nonrandomized experimental study, 22 patients, median age 71 years, with severe HF were studied before and after 3 months of receiving nocturnal oxygen. The measures used were overnight polysomnography, echocardiography, 6-minute walk test, self-assessed sleep difficulties (Uppsala Sleep Inventory-HF), daytime sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale), and HRQOL (36-ltem Short Form Health Survey and Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire). SDB, with a 90% dominance of central sleep apnea, occurred in 41 % of the patients with severe HF before intervention. After intervention, functional capacity improved for both the whole group of patients with HF (P < .01) and HF patients with SDB (P < .05). No improvements regarding cardiac function, objective sleep, subjective sleep, or SDB were seen, except for a decrease of ‚â•4% desaturations (P < 05). HRQOL did not differ significantly between HF patients with and without SDB before or after intervention with nocturnal oxygen. Long-term nocturnal oxygen treatment improved functional capacity in patients with severe HF, with or without SDB. No improvements were seen regarding sleep, daytime sleepiness, SDB, cardiac function, or HRQOL.
|
|
| 8. |
- Casimir Ahn, Henrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term left ventricular support in patients with a mechanical aortic valve
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. - : INFORMA HEALTHCARE, TELEPHONE HOUSE, 69-77 PAUL STREET, LONDON EC2A 4LQ, ENGLAND. - 1401-7431 .- 1651-2006. ; 47:4, s. 236-239
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives. The presence of a mechanical prosthesis has been regarded as an increased risk of thromboembolic complications and as a relative contraindication for a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Five patients in our center had a mechanical aortic valve at the time of device implantation and were studied regarding thromboembolic complications. Design. Five patients operated upon with an LVAD (1 HeartMate I (TM), 4 HeartMate II (TM)) between 2002 and 2011 had a mechanical aortic valve at the time of implantation. The first patient had a patch closure of the aortic valve. In four patients, the prosthesis was left in place. Anticoagulants included aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel. Results. The average and accumulated treatment times were 150 and 752 days, respectively. Three of the five patients showed early signs of valve thrombosis on echo with concomitant valve dysfunction. Four patients were transplanted without thromboembolic events during pump treatment. One patient died from a hemorrhagic stroke after 90 days on the LVAD. Conclusions. The strategy of leaving a mechanical heart valve in place at the time of LVAD implantation in five patients led to valvular thrombosis in three but did not provoke embolic events. It increased the complexity of postoperative anticoagulation.
|
|
| 9. |
- Granfeldt, Hans, et al.
(författare)
-
A single center experience with the HeartMate II (TM) Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)
- 2009
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1401-7431 .- 1651-2006. ; 43:6, s. 360-365
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives. Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD), used in the setting bridge-to-transplantation and destination therapy, for patients with deteriorating severe heart failure are continuously developing. The second generation, the axial flow pumps, have been introduced since some years. Design. Eleven consecutive patients, seven male, with severe heart failure due to ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 5), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 5) and cytotoxic ethiology (n = 1) were implanted with the HeartMate-II (TM). They were preoperatively treated with inotropic support (n = 9), ventricular assist device (n = 2) and mechanical ventilation (n = 4). Results. Eight patients were bridged to transplant after median 155 days (range, 65 to 316 days). One patient is ongoing for 748 days, intended for destination therapy. Ten of eleven patients were discharged after median 64 days (range, 40 to 105 days). Four patients were reoperated due to bleeding. Two embolic events were recorded. One perioperative death. Conclusion. Eleven HM-II (TM) LVADs have been implanted in our institution with good early results. Eight patients were successfully bridged to heart transplantation. One patient is intended for destination therapy and is ongoing since November 2006. In these severely ill patients, this technique offers a good chance surviving until heart transplantation. In selected cases the technique also offers the possibility of a permanent support and longevity.
|
|
| 10. |
- He, Wei, et al.
(författare)
-
Concomitant Discontinuation of Cardiovascular Therapy and Adjuvant Hormone Therapy Among Patients With Breast Cancer
- 2023
-
Ingår i: JAMA Network Open. - : AMER MEDICAL ASSOC. - 2574-3805. ; 6:7
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- IMPORTANCE A large proportion of patients with breast cancer concomitantly use adjuvant hormone therapy and cardiovascular therapy. OBJECTIVE To examine the relative risk of discontinuing cardiovascular therapy during the periods before and after discontinuation of adjuvant hormone therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This population-based cohort study included all women aged 40 to 74 years in Stockholm, Sweden, who were diagnosed with breast cancer and concomitantly using adjuvant hormone therapy and cardiovascular therapy. Patients were enrolled from July 1, 2005, to August 31, 2020, with a median follow-up of 7.2 years. Data were analyzed from November 3, 2021, to May 12, 2022. EXPOSURE Discontinuation of adjuvant hormone therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was discontinuation of cardiovascular therapy (cardiovascular drugs, statins, or aspirin) within 1 year before and after discontinuation of adjuvant hormone therapy. Incidence rate ratios with 95% CIs were estimated using Poisson regression. Furthermore, hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs for cause-specific mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards regression models, comparing those who discontinued and continued adjuvant hormone therapy. RESULTS A total of 5493 patients with breast cancer who concomitantly used cardiovascular therapy were identified; 1811 who discontinued adjuvant hormone therapy were individually matched to 1 patient each who continued therapy by year of breast cancer diagnosis, age at diagnosis, and use of the same cardiovascular therapy. Most patients (4070 [74.1%]) were aged 60 years or older at diagnosis. At the time when patients discontinued adjuvant hormone therapy, 248 (12.2%) concomitantly discontinued their cardiovascular therapy. During follow-up, a higher discontinuation rate of cardiovascular therapy was also observed among those who discontinued adjuvant hormone therapy. Consistently, adjuvant hormone therapy discontinuation was associated with an increased risk of death not only due to breast cancer (HR, 1.43; 95 CI%, 1.01-2.01) but also cardiovascular disease (HR, 1.79; 95 CI%, 1.15-2.81). Stratifying the analyses on baseline type of adjuvant hormone therapy yielded consistent results. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of data from population-based registers in Sweden, patients who discontinued adjuvant hormone therapy were also more likely to discontinue cardiovascular therapy, especially at the time when they discontinued adjuvant hormone therapy. These findings suggest that clinicians should shift from single- to multiple-disease focus to prevent discontinuation of therapies for other diseases among patients with breast cancer.
|
|
