| 1. |
- Berggren, Åsa, et al.
(författare)
-
Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük : integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Antiquity. - : Antiquity Publications. - 0003-598X .- 1745-1744. ; 89:344, s. 433-448
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this paper is to summarize progress in the development of reflexive methods at Çatalhöyük over the past 20 years, and to describe some recent innovations that have used digital and 3D technologies to enhance the original reflexive aims. While digital technologies were not at the forefront of the methods described in an initial account of reflexive methods published in Antiquity (Hodder 1997), it has become clear that many of the original aims can be enhanced by the use of new generations of computer assisted technologies for visualization, recording and planning. The paper does not describe the full use of digital technologies at Çatalhöyük; for example laser scanning is being used as part of the documentation for conservation evaluation. The wider use of digital technologies is discussed by Forte et al (2012); the aim in this paper is to discuss those aspects of digital technologies that relate to the reflexive aims of the project, thereby adding to the continuing discussion on reflexive archaeological practice (see Bender et al. 2007; Berggren 2001; Berggren & Hodder 2003; M. Carver 2011; G. Carver 2011; Castaneda 2008; Chadwick 2003; Edgeworth 2006; Hodder 2003; Silliman 2008; Yarrow 2003).
|
|
| 2. |
- Forte, Maurizio, et al.
(författare)
-
Building 89 and 3D Digging Project
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Çatalhöyük 2015 Archive Report : by members of the Çatalhöyük Research Project - by members of the Çatalhöyük Research Project. ; , s. 215-247
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 3. |
- Lingle, Ashley, et al.
(författare)
-
Painted Plaster Head
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Çatalhöyük 2015 Archive Report : by members of the Çatalhöyük Research Project - by members of the Çatalhöyük Research Project. ; , s. 275-289
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Yaka, Reyhan, et al.
(författare)
-
Variable kinship patterns in Neolithic Anatolia revealed by ancient genomes
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Current Biology. - : Cell Press. - 0960-9822 .- 1879-0445. ; 31:11, s. 2455-2468.e18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The social organization of the first fully sedentary societies that emerged during the Neolithic period in Southwest Asia remains enigmatic,(1) mainly because material culture studies provide limited insight into this issue. However, because Neolithic Anatolian communities often buried their dead beneath domestic buildings,(2) household composition and social structure can be studied through these human remains. Here, we describe genetic relatedness among co-burials associated with domestic buildings in Neolithic Anatolia using 59 ancient genomes, including 22 new genomes from Asxikli Hoyuk and Catalhoyuk. We infer pedigree relationships by simultaneously analyzing multiple types of information, including autosomal and X chromosome kinship coefficients, maternal markers, and radiocarbon dating. In two early Neolithic villages dating to the 9th and 8th millennia BCE, Asxikli Hoyuk and Boncuklu, we discover that siblings and parent-offspring pairings were frequent within domestic structures, which provides the first direct indication of close genetic relationships among co-burials. In contrast, in the 7th millennium BCE sites of Catalhoyuk and Barcin, where we study subadults interred within and around houses, we find close genetic relatives to be rare. Hence, genetic relatedness may not have played a major role in the choice of burial location at these latter two sites, at least for subadults. This supports the hypothesis that in Catalhoyuk,(3-5) and possibly in some other Neolithic communities, domestic structures may have served as burial location for social units incorporating biologically unrelated individuals. Our results underscore the diversity of kin structures in Neolithic communities during this important phase of sociocultural development.
|
|
