| 1. |
- Appelgren, Staffan, 1967, et al.
(författare)
-
Introduktion: varför Japan?
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Japan nu: strömningar och perspektiv. - Stockholm : Carlsson bokförlag. - 9789173317368 ; , s. 15-27
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Gustafsson, Karl, et al.
(författare)
-
Forskningsproblem : vad står på spel?
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Att forska. - Stockholm : Carlsson Bokförlag. - 9789173317696 ; , s. 96-118
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 4. |
- Gustafsson, Karl, et al.
(författare)
-
Long live pacifism! : narrative power and Japan’spacifist model
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Cambridge Review of International Affairs. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0955-7571 .- 1474-449X. ; 32:4, s. 502-520
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- International relations research acknowledges that states can have different security policies but neglects the fact that ‘models’ may exist in the security policy realm. This article suggests that it is useful to think about models, which it argues can become examples for emulation or be undermined through narrative power. It illustrates the argument by analysing Japan’s pacifism—an alternative approach to security policy which failed to become an internationally popular model and, despite serving the country well for many years, has even lost its appeal in Japan. Conventional explanations suggest that Japan’s pacifist policies were ‘abnormal’, and that the Japanese eventually realized this. By contrast, this article argues that narratives undermined Japan’s pacifism by mobilizing deep-seated beliefs about what is realistic and unrealistic in international politics, and launches a counter-narrative that could help make pacifism a more credible model in world politics.
|
|
| 5. |
- Gustafsson, Karl, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
The insecurity of doing research and the ‘so what question’ in political science : how to develop more compelling research problems by facing anxiety
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European Political Science. - 1680-4333 .- 1682-0983. ; , s. -15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Research problems are crucial in the sense that they provide new research with purpose and justification. So why, despite the abundance of guidance available from an extensive methods literature, do graduate students often struggle to develop compelling research problems? This article argues that the process of developing research problems epitomises the insecurity of doing research. We focus in particular on the anxiety that graduate students often seek to avoid or alleviate through a range of counterproductive coping strategies. The existing literature on research problems focuses predominantly on the technical aspects of doing research while neglecting how anxiety might affect the research process. This article seeks to rectify this shortcoming by providing advice on how graduate students can face such anxiety, and how professors can assist them in this endeavour. Drawing on theories about identity and anxiety, the article explains the allure of coping strategies such as gap-filling, while arguing that anxiety is not necessarily a negative emotion to be avoided at all costs, but integral to learning and creativity. It concludes by suggesting that compelling research problems can be constructed through the formulation of narratives that try to embrace anxiety, instead of seeking premature resolutions.
|
|
| 6. |
- Gustafsson, Karl, et al.
(författare)
-
What Is the Point? : Teaching Graduate Students how to Construct Political Science Research Puzzles
- 2018
-
Ingår i: European Political Science. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1680-4333 .- 1682-0983. ; 17:4, s. 634-648
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- One of the key challenges graduate students face is how to come up with a good rationale for their theses. Unfortunately, the methods literature in and beyond political science does not provide much advice on this important issue. While focusing on how to conduct research, this literature has largely neglected the question of why a study should be undertaken. The limited discussions that can be found suggest that new research is justified if it (1) fills a ‘gap’; (2) addresses an important real-world problem; and/or (3) is methodologically rigorous. This article discusses the limitations of these rationales. Then, it proposes that research puzzles are more useful for clarifying the nature and importance of a contribution to existing research, and hence a better way of justifying new research. The article also explores and clarifies what research puzzles are, and begins to devise a method for constructing them out of the vague ideas and questions that often trigger a research process.
|
|
| 7. |
- Ha, Thao-Nguyen, et al.
(författare)
-
Resentment, status dissatisfaction, and the emotional underpinnings of Japanese security policy
- 2023
-
Ingår i: International Relations of the Asia-Pacific. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1470-482X .- 1470-4838. ; , s. 383-415
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- What explains Japan’s security policy change in recent decades? Heeding the ‘emotional turn’ in International Relations, this article applies a resentment-based framework, which defines resentment as a long-lasting form of anger and the product of status dissatisfaction. Leveraging interviews with 18 conservative Japanese lawmakers and senior officials, the article discusses the role, function, and prevalence of resentment in the remaking of Japan’s security policy, premised on constitutional revision. The analysis reveals that conservative elites are acutely status-conscious; and that those who blame a perceived inferior status on Japan’s alleged pacifism are more likely to see revision of Article 9 as an end in itself. For a subset of conservatives, however, the goal is rather to stretch the Constitution to enhance Japan’s means of deterrence vis-à-vis objects of fear or in solidarity with allies. Overall, the article demonstrates that resentment provides a fruitful lens for analyzing status dissatisfaction in international politics.
|
|
| 8. |
- Hagström, Linus, Professor, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Aikido and world politics : a practice theory for transcending the security dilemma
- 2022
-
Ingår i: European Journal of International Relations. - : SAGE Publications. - 1354-0661 .- 1460-3713. ; 28:2, s. 263-286
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In the final analysis, is the security dilemma inescapable? Or can the protagonists in world politics learn to live with never-ending insecurities and the risk of attack without producing precisely the outcomes that they wish to avoid? This article explores this fundamental problem for International Relations theory by performing a thought experiment, in which it applies lessons from aikido to world politics. A form of Japanese budo, or martial art, aikido provides practitioners with a method for harbouring insecurities, and for dealing with attacks that may or may not occur, by empathically caring for actual and potential attackers. The article builds on practice theory in assuming that any social order is constructed and internalised through practices, but also capable of change through the introduction and dissemination of new practices. Although an unlikely scenario, aikido practice could serve as such a method of fundamental transformation if widely applied in world politics. Empirical examples ranging from international apologies and security cooperation to foreign aid and peacekeeping operations are discussed, suggesting that contemporary world politics is at times already performed in accordance with aikido principles, albeit only imperfectly and partially.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
