| 1. |
- Ölvander, Johan, et al.
(författare)
-
Preface
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of NordDesign: Design in the Era of Digitalization, NordDesign 2018.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
- Bramklev, Caroline, et al.
(författare)
-
On the Logistics Effects of Integrated Product and Package Design
- 2007
-
Ingår i: [Host publication title missing].
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- If engineering designers consciously design product and package in an integrated manner, there is a great potential for industrial global enterprises to develop and produce mechanical products, such as exhaust extraction systems, ear washer machines and fuel handling systems while simultaneously obtaining error-free deliveries, saving costs and avoiding quality problems. Thus, the authors of this paper see a challenge in developing the theory and methodology for Integrated Product and Package Design. ln this paper we take a first step in this direction. Firstly, we have carried out a broad review of literature, which shows that there is a need for research into Integrated Product and Packaging Design. Secondly, we have analysed three cases from industrial practice, which show that a conscious and integrated design of product and package has positive logistics effects, whereas neglecting this issue might result in higher costs and quality problems. On the basis of these cases we have made an initial cross-case analysis, which indicates that it is possible to develop the terminology and methodology for Integrated Product and Package Design.
|
|
| 3. |
- Motte, Damien, et al.
(författare)
-
A note on the debate on scientific process vs. design process
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Engineering Design - ICED'11. - 2223-7941 .- 2220-4342. - 9781904670322 ; DS 68:2, s. 356-365
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- It has been often claimed that the scientific process is quite opposite to the design process, mainly based on the former’s analysis of existing phenomena in order to develop a theory, while the design process is an act of synthesis that creates something new in the world. In the light of the developments that led to this conception, and with reference to the current views of the scientific process, we maintain that the scientific process has more similarities with the design process than differences from it. As parallels can be drawn between the two processes, some implications for further research into the fundamentals of the design activity are discussed.
|
|
