| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Heinat, Fredrik
(författare)
-
Adjectives and clausal complementation
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Working papers in Scandinavian syntax. - 1100-097X. ; :89, s. 37-67
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In this paper I show that Swedish has a type of relative clause that doesn’t modifynominal expressions, contrary tomost descriptions/definitions of relative clauses.Instead this type of relative clause modifies evaluative predicates. The relativeclause has similarities to both control clauses and attributive relative clauses.I point out some issues that theoretical accounts of these relative clauses musttake into consideration, and also how current generative analyses fail to meetthese considerations. A promising route in such a generative framework seemsto be one where the head of the relative clause and the relative clause itself areindependently merged in the structure; the head as subject in the matrix clauseand the relative clause as an adjunct/complement to the predicate it modifies.What makes this relative clause different from NP modifying relative clauses isthe relation between the gap and the head.
|
|
| 7. |
- heinat, fredrik
(författare)
-
Adjectives and clausal complementation
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax. - 1100-097X. ; 89, s. 37-67
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Heinat, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Anaphoric Reference to Quantified Expressions in Swedish
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. - New York City, NY : Springer. - 0090-6905 .- 1573-6555. ; 48:3, s. 551-568
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper presents the results from two studies on anaphoric reference to quantifying expressions (QEs) in Swedish, contributing to the current cross-linguistic discussion on this issue. For English it has been shown that the polarity of the QE (positive vs negative) determines the anaphoric set reference (to the referens set, REFSET, or to the complement set, COMPSET), while for Spanish it has been claimed that while REFSET interpretation is the default, the relative sizes of the two sets (REFSET and COMPSET) also matters. In Experiment 1, a semantic plausibility study. The results showed that for positive QEs, anaphoric reference can only be to the REFSET, while for negative QEs, it can only be to the COMPSET. Unlike in English and Spanish, REFSET continuations were categorically ruled out for negative QEs. To investigate whether the internal differences between QEs could be explained in terms of set size, we conducted Experiment 2, an estimation task. The results from this experiment showed that the size of the REFSET relative to the COMPSET was not a determining factor.
|
|
