| 1. |
- Bager, Johan-Emil, et al.
(författare)
-
Hypertension: sex-related differences in drug treatment, prevalence and blood pressure control in primary care.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of human hypertension. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1476-5527. ; 37, s. 662-670
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Antihypertensive treatment is equally beneficial for reducing cardiovascular risk in both men and women. Despite this, the drug treatment, prevalence and control of hypertension differ between men and women. Men and women respond differently, particularly with respect to the risk of adverse events, to many antihypertensive drugs. Certain antihypertensive drugs may also be especially beneficial in the setting of certain comorbidities - of both cardiovascular and extracardiac nature - which also differ between men and women. Furthermore, hypertension in pregnancy can pose a considerable therapeutic challenge for women and their physicians in primary care. In addition, data from population-based studies and from real-world data are inconsistent regarding whether men or women attain hypertension-related goals to a higher degree. In population-based studies, women with hypertension have higher rates of treatment and controlled blood pressure than men, whereas real-world, primary-care data instead show better blood pressure control in men. Men and women are also treated with different antihypertensive drugs: women use more thiazide diuretics and men use more angiotensin-enzyme inhibitors and calcium-channel blockers. This narrative review explores these sex-related differences with guidance from current literature. It also features original data from a large, Swedish primary-care register, which showed that blood pressure control was better in women than men until they reached their late sixties, after which the situation was reversed. This age-related decrease in blood pressure control in women was not, however, accompanied by a proportional increase in use of antihypertensive drugs and female sex was a significant predictor of less intensive antihypertensive treatment.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bentzel, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term secondary prevention and outcome following acute coronary syndrome: Real-world results from the Swedish Primary Care Cardiovascular Database (SPCCD)
- 2024
-
Ingår i: European journal of preventive cardiology. - 2047-4881. ; 31:7, s. 812-821
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Most studies of treatment adherence after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on prescribed drugs and lack long-term follow-up or consecutive data on risk factor control. We studied the long-term treatment adherence, risk factor control and its association to recurrent ACS and death.We retrospectively included 3765 patients (mean age 75 years, 40% women) with incident ACS from 1 January 2006 until 31 December 2010 from the SPCCD-SKA database. All patients were followed until 31 December 2014 or death. We recorded blood pressure (BP), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), recurrent ACS and death. We used data on dispensed drugs to calculate proportion of days covered for secondary prevention medications. Cox regressions were used to analyse the association of achieved BP and LDL-C to recurrent ACS and death.The median follow-up time was 4.8 years. Proportion of patients that reached BP <140/90mmHg was 58% year 1 and 66% year 8. 65% of the patients reached LDL-C<2.5mmol/L at year 1 and 56% at year 8, however adherence to statins varied from 43% to 60%. Only 62% of the patients had yearly measured BP, and only 28% yearly measured LDL-C. SBP was not associated with a higher risk of recurrent ACS or death. LDL-C of 3.0mmol/L were associated with a higher risk of recurrent ACS [HR 1.19 (95% CI 1.00-1.40)] and death HR 1.26 [(95% CI 1.08-1.47)] compared to an LDL-C 1.8mmol/L.This observational long-term real-world study demonstrates low drug adherence and potential for improvement of risk factors after ACS. Furthermore, the study confirms that uncontrolled LDL-C is associated with adverse outcome even in this older population.
|
|
| 3. |
- Dalemo, Sofia, et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term follow-up of patients with elevated serum calcium concentration in Swedish primary care
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0281-3432 .- 1502-7724. ; 31:4, s. 248-254
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective. To follow up patients with elevated calcium concentrations after 10 years. Design. Longitudinal, using medical records, questionnaires, and clinical investigation. Setting. Primary care in Tibro, Sweden, 2008–2010. Subjects. 127 patents with elevated calcium concentrations and 254 patients with normal calcium concentrations from the local community, attending the health care centre. Main outcome measures. Diagnoses and mortality in patients with elevated calcium concentrations in 1995–2000, compared with patients with normal calcium concentrations and the background population. Results. The proportion of patients for whom no underlying cause was detected decreased from 55% at baseline to 12% at follow-up. Primary hyperparathyroidism was most common in women, 23% at baseline and 36% at follow-up, and the cancer prevalence increased from 5% to 12% in patients with elevated calcium concentration. Mortality tended to be higher in men with elevated calcium concentrations compared with men with normal calcium concentrations, and was significantly higher than in the background population (SMR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3–3.8). Cancer mortality was significantly increased in men (p = 0.039). Low calcium concentrations were also associated with higher mortality (p = 0.004), compared with patients with normal calcium concentrations. Conclusion. This study underscores the importance of investigating patients with increased calcium concentrations suggesting that most of these patients – 88% in our study – will turn out to have an underlying disease associated with hypercalcaemia during a 10-year follow-up period. Elevated calcium concentrations had a different disease pattern in men and women, with men showing increased cancer mortality in this study. Read More: http://informahealthcare.com/doi/abs/10.3109/02813432.2013.861152
|
|
| 4. |
- Quester, Rebecka, 1984, et al.
(författare)
-
Improving cardiovascular control in a hypertensive population in primary care. Results from a staff training intervention
- 2024
-
Ingår i: SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE. - 0281-3432 .- 1502-7724. ; 42:2, s. 347-354
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: A pilot study to evaluate a staff training intervention implementing a nurse-led hypertension care model. Design and setting: Clinical and laboratory data from all primary care centres (PCCs) in the Swedish region Vastra Gotaland (VGR), retrieved from regional registers. Intervention started 2018 in 11 PCCs. A total of 190 PCCs served as controls. Change from baseline was assessed 2 years after start of intervention. Intervention: Training of selected personnel, primarily in drug choice, team-based care, measurement techniques, and use of standardized medical treatment protocols. Patients: Hypertensive patients without diabetes or ischemic heart disease were included. The intervention and control groups contained approximately 10,000 and 145,000 individuals, respectively. Main outcome measuresBlood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg, LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) <3.0 mmol/L, BP ending on -0 mmHg (digit preference, an indirect sign of manual measuring technique), choice of antihypertensive drugs, cholesterol lowering therapy and attendance patterns were measured. Results: In the intervention group, the percentage of patients reaching the BP target did not change significantly, 56%-61% (control 50%-52%), non-significant. However, the percentage of patients with LDL-C < 3.0 mmol/L increased from 34%-40% (control 36%-36%), p = .043, and digit preference decreased, 39%-27% (control 41%-35%), p = 0.000. The number of antihypertensive drugs was constant, 1.63 - 1.64 (control 1.62 - 1.62), non-significant, but drug choice changed in line with recommendations. Conclusion: Although this primary care intervention based on staff training failed to improve BP control, it resulted in improved cardiovascular control by improved cholesterol lowering treatment. Hypertension is common and often suboptimally treated in relation to existing guidelines. This register study evaluates the results of a staff training intervention promoting nurse-led care. The intervention had an impact on measurement techniques, drug choice and improved cholesterol control.
|
|
