| 1. |
- Bangalore, Sripal, et al.
(författare)
-
Management of Coronary Disease in Patients with Advanced Kidney Disease.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 382:17, s. 1608-1618
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Clinical trials that have assessed the effect of revascularization in patients with stable coronary disease have routinely excluded those with advanced chronic kidney disease.METHODS: We randomly assigned 777 patients with advanced kidney disease and moderate or severe ischemia on stress testing to be treated with an initial invasive strategy consisting of coronary angiography and revascularization (if appropriate) added to medical therapy or an initial conservative strategy consisting of medical therapy alone and angiography reserved for those in whom medical therapy had failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. A key secondary outcome was a composite of death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest.RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 2.2 years, a primary outcome event had occurred in 123 patients in the invasive-strategy group and in 129 patients in the conservative-strategy group (estimated 3-year event rate, 36.4% vs. 36.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.29; P = 0.95). Results for the key secondary outcome were similar (38.5% vs. 39.7%; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.29). The invasive strategy was associated with a higher incidence of stroke than the conservative strategy (hazard ratio, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 9.32; P = 0.004) and with a higher incidence of death or initiation of dialysis (hazard ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.11; P = 0.03).CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with stable coronary disease, advanced chronic kidney disease, and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of death or nonfatal myocardial infarction. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; ISCHEMIA-CKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01985360.).
|
|
| 2. |
- Chandramohan, Arun, et al.
(författare)
-
Design-Rules for Stapled Alpha-Helical Peptides with On-Target In Vivo Activity: Application to Mdm2/X dual antagonists
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Nature Communications. - : Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. - 2041-1723.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Stapled α-helical peptides can bind to and modulate historically intractable targets while addressing the traditional liabilities associated with peptide therapeutics. However, their pipeline advancement has been impeded by the challenges of identifying peptides with sufficient cellular uptake to engage the target protein while lacking off-target toxicities. Here, we advance the field to arrive at a workflow for identifying advanced stapled peptide lead molecules with on-target in vivo activity with no off-target cell proliferation effects. Specifically, we generated a >350-member library based on ATSP-7041, a stapled peptide Mdm2(X) antagonist with validated on-target cellular effects but with significant off-target activity. Key insights from library analysis include 1) a clear correlation between lipophilicity and permeability, 2) removal of positive charge to avoid off-target toxicities, 3) judicious placement of anionic residues to enhance peptide solubility/behavior, 4) optimization of C-terminal length and helicity to enhance cell activity, 5) optimization of staple type/number to avoid polypharmacology. Incorporation of one or more of these attributes led to molecules with improved in vitro and in vivo activities (up to a >292x improved cell proliferation EC50). A subset of peptides were devoid of off-target cell proliferation effects in cell lines lacking wild-type p53 protein (up to a >3800x on-target index). This latter improvement contrasted with clinical Mdm2 antagonistic molecules. Application of these ‘design rules’ to a distinct Mdm2(X) peptide series resulted in rapid improvement in cellular activity (>150x) and removal of off-target toxicities. Overall, the detailed workflow outlined here should help researchers identify stapled α-helical peptides for therapeutic impact.
|
|
| 3. |
- Chandramohan, Arun, et al.
(författare)
-
Design-rules for stapled peptides with in vivo activity and their application to Mdm2/X antagonists
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Nature Communications. - : Springer Nature. - 2041-1723. ; 15:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although stapled α-helical peptides can address challenging targets, their advancement is impeded by poor understandings for making them cell permeable while avoiding off-target toxicities. By synthesizing >350 molecules, we present workflows for identifying stapled peptides against Mdm2(X) with in vivo activity and no off-target effects. Key insights include a clear correlation between lipophilicity and permeability, removal of positive charge to avoid off-target toxicities, judicious anionic residue placement to enhance solubility/behavior, optimization of C-terminal length/helicity to enhance potency, and optimization of staple type/number to avoid polypharmacology. Workflow application gives peptides with >292x improved cell proliferation potencies and no off-target cell proliferation effects ( > 3800x on-target index). Application of these ‘design rules’ to a distinct Mdm2(X) peptide series improves ( > 150x) cellular potencies and removes off-target toxicities. The outlined workflow should facilitate therapeutic impacts, especially for those targets such as Mdm2(X) that have hydrophobic interfaces and are targetable with a helical motif.
|
|
| 4. |
- Spertus, John A, et al.
(författare)
-
Health Status after Invasive or Conservative Care in Coronary and Advanced Kidney Disease.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 382:17, s. 1619-1628
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial, the primary analysis showed no significant difference in the risk of death or myocardial infarction with initial angiography and revascularization plus guideline-based medical therapy (invasive strategy) as compared with guideline-based medical therapy alone (conservative strategy) in participants with stable ischemic heart disease, moderate or severe ischemia, and advanced chronic kidney disease (an estimated glomerular filtration rate of <30 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 or receipt of dialysis). A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status.METHODS: We assessed health status with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) before randomization and at 1.5, 3, and 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. The primary outcome of this analysis was the SAQ Summary score (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less frequent angina and better function and quality of life). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate the treatment effect with the invasive strategy.RESULTS: Health status was assessed in 705 of 777 participants. Nearly half the participants (49%) had had no angina during the month before randomization. At 3 months, the estimated mean difference between the invasive-strategy group and the conservative-strategy group in the SAQ Summary score was 2.1 points (95% credible interval, -0.4 to 4.6), a result that favored the invasive strategy. The mean difference in score at 3 months was largest among participants with daily or weekly angina at baseline (10.1 points; 95% credible interval, 0.0 to 19.9), smaller among those with monthly angina at baseline (2.2 points; 95% credible interval, -2.0 to 6.2), and nearly absent among those without angina at baseline (0.6 points; 95% credible interval, -1.9 to 3.3). By 6 months, the between-group difference in the overall trial population was attenuated (0.5 points; 95% credible interval, -2.2 to 3.4).CONCLUSIONS: Participants with stable ischemic heart disease, moderate or severe ischemia, and advanced chronic kidney disease did not have substantial or sustained benefits with regard to angina-related health status with an initially invasive strategy as compared with a conservative strategy. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ISCHEMIA-CKD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01985360.).
|
|
