| 1. |
- Barnholdt, Robin, et al.
(författare)
-
Cirkulering av delar och detaljer från äldre byggnader
- 2017
-
Ingår i: ÅTERBRUK OCH BYGGNADSVÅRD. Cirkulering av delar och detaljer från äldre byggnader. - Göteborg och Stockholm : Makadam. - 9789170612077
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Denna forskningsrapport sätter in sådan återanvändning av äldre byggnadsdelar och detaljer i ett större sammanhang. Detta utgörs av den marknad där byggnadsdelar och detaljer från äldre byggnader cirkulerar. Byggnadsdelar cirkulerar genom tillgång och efterfrågan, utifrån rådande ideal, skilda estetiska utgångspunkter och kunskaper, något som också är kopplat till funktionalitet och ekonomi. Fokus har därför lagts på att undersöka det utbud, de kunskaper och de synsätt som förekommer inom olika så kallade byggnadsvårdsbutiker, men rör också andra butiker där byggnadsdelar kan köpas.
|
|
| 2. |
- Benesch, Henric, 1972, et al.
(författare)
-
Keeping things in common
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Heritage as Common(s) - Common(s) as Heritage. - Göteborg : Makadam Publishers. - 9789170611643
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction in book from Curating the City Seminar Series, part of Critical Heritage studies Initiateve at the University of Gothenburg
|
|
| 3. |
- Bogdanova, Elena, 1976, et al.
(författare)
-
Negotiating Heritage. Care and Maintenance of Old Buildings in a Swedish Online Discussion Group.
- 2018
-
Ingår i: ACHS Biannual conference. Hangzhou, China, 1-6 Sep 2018.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In this paper, we analyze the online discussion group devoted to practices of repair, maintenance and care of ordinary everyday old buildings in Sweden as a space for grass-root politics of heritage making. Here the definitions of heritage and preservation are simultaneously reinforced and challenged by different actors that are involved into the pragmatic discussions on preservation and repair. Our questions are: 1) how heritage and preservation are defined through different practices of repair or ‘matters of concern’ regarding old buildings, and 2) how different group members establish the discursive borders of heritage and preservation and challenge them using the top-down and bottom-up strategies. In order to trace the emergence of different types of pragmatic justifications of heritage and its value, we depart from the notion of ‘multivariate interpretations of buildings as heritage’ (Lowenthal 1998), and approach our questions theoretically by using the concepts of “orders of worth” (Boltanski and Thevenot 1999) and “regimes of engagement” (Thevenot 2001). The forum is initially a bottom-up initiative of heritage enthusiasts, and it was initially created by the representatives of the “enactment of care” with an ongoing moderation of content. However, the organizers of the group are framing their policies along the lines of the authorized heritage discourse and by monitoring and policing are, in fact, exercising the quasi top-down strategy of defining heritage and its preservation. There is interesting and thought-provoking dynamic of heritage-making and its contestation between quasi top-down as represented by forum moderators and quasi bottom-up “ordinary” group members in the discussion threads. Old buildings here appear as embedded in both authorized and ‘popular’ notions of heritage. There are polyvocal understandings/justifications of both ‘preservation’ and ‘change’, and this polyvocality is not only related to the number of participants, but also to the different orders of worth they are relating to. While the preservationist side of the group is trying to keep the buildings within the conventional space of heritage, a group of users (often craftsmen or small conventional construction companies, or owners) are constantly challenging the borders of top-down value judgements and are trying to “move” the building and its repair to the borders of the conventional discourse. They offer alternative bottom-up “enabling solutions” that are received by more orthodox forum members as inappropriate and endangering the efforts of preservation. While heritage enthusiasts are trying to guard and enact the formal discursive borders of how preservation is defined, the “challengers” are trying to blur or loosen them. Both groups are referring to pragmatics and ethics in their justification strategies, but they frame them differently. The group becomes the space created through simultaneous top-down and bottom-up negotiations of heritage values, which is unlikely to appear elsewhere, and where preservation and heritage are contested discursively by being addressed by interest groups using the logics of different “orders of worth”.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
-
Co-curating the City Universities and urban heritage past and future
- 2022
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Co-curating the City explores the role of universities in the construction and mobilisation of heritage discourses in urban development and regeneration processes, with a focus on six case study sites: University of Gothenburg (Sweden), UCL East (London), University of Lund (Sweden). Roma Tre university (Rome), American University of Beirut, and Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil. The aim of the book is to expand the field of critical heritage studies in the urban domain, by examining the role of institutional actors both in the construction of urban heritage discourses and in how those discourses influence urban planning decisions or become instrumentalised as mechanisms for urban regeneration. It proposes that universities engage in these processes in a number of ways: as producers of urban knowledge that is mobilised to intervene in planning processes; as producers of heritage practices that are implemented in development contexts in the urban realm; and as developers engaged in campus construction projects that both reference heritage discourses as a mechanism for promoting support and approval by planners and the public, and capitalise on heritage assets as a resource. The book highlights the participatory processes through which universities are positioning themselves as significant institutions in the development of urban heritage narratives. The case studies investigate how universities, as mixed communities of interest dispersed across buildings and urban sites, engage in strategies of engagement with local people and neighbourhoods, and ask how this may be contributing to a re-shaping of ideas, narratives, and lived experience of urban heritage in which universities have a distinctive agency. The authors cross disciplinary and cultural boundaries, and bridge academia and practice.
|
|
| 6. |
- Hansen, Christine, 1961, et al.
(författare)
-
Motion and flow in heritage institutions. Two cases of challenges from within
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Nordisk Museologi. - 1103-8152. ; 2016:1, s. 40-51
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Through the lens of two case studies within two national contexts, this paper seeks to understand how purportedly stable and self-contained institutions such as museums, archives and local government repositories are re-formed through engagement with subaltern subjects. Although there is much analysis of heritage institutions that follows major ideological shifts of the 20th century (Grundberg, 2002; Lowenthal, 1985; Pettersson, 2003; Wetterberg, 1992), these organisations are still often considered to bear institutional legacies of the 19th century (Bennett, 1995). Rather than focus on these characteristics however, we will instead explore institutional permeability, noticing how meeting the subaltern in particular inspires ‘motion and flow’, which in turn affects notions of what constitutes ‘heritage’. As we unfold each case, we pay attention to the processes through which this permeability stimulates friction. This is most problematic when the commission of the heritage institution and the construction of national identity are entwined, with the (unarticulated) aim of reiterating established discourses of power (Smith, 2006). Alternatively, we also explore how heritage institutions can function, somewhat counter-intuitively, as sites of remediation. This happens when negative associations of institutional control are flipped, and instead become places for the previously marginalized to find a voice within the authorized national narrative. In our two examples we show how pressures applied by Aboriginal people in Australia and Roma people in Sweden respectively have forced transgressions of professional practice and in doing so have offered a challenge to the idea of what constitutes a heritage expert. Both cases, of re-ordered management protocols in the National Museum of Australia and the much more recent integration of Roma historical places into Swedish institutional memory, demonstrate the effect of the subaltern subject on heritage institutions. We can see that in one of the cases a radical inclusion has been achieved, while the other has begun what is likely to be a long-term, complex, cultural conversation. While these cases vary in scale – one bears the weight of a colonial history whilst the other does not – they nevertheless share the contemporary myths and misunderstandings around what happens when heritage institutions meet with subaltern peoples and the challenges they offer from within.
|
|
| 7. |
-
Heritage as Common(s) - Common(s) as Heritage
- 2015
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- The book consitutes the printed outcome of a seminar series run by the Critical Heritage Initiative (University of Gothenburg) and the Urban Heritage Cluster (Curating the City).
|
|
| 8. |
-
Heritage as Common(s) - Common(s) as Heritage
- 2015
-
Samlingsverk (redaktörskap) (refereegranskat)abstract
- The book consitutes the printed outcome of a seminar series run by the Critical Heritage Initiative (University of Gothenburg) and the Urban Heritage Cluster (Curating the City).
|
|
| 9. |
- Holmberg, Ingrid Martins, 1964
(författare)
-
Amnesins platser. Romska tältläger i minnespolitikens kraftfält
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Göteborg utforskat. Studier av en stad i förvandling. Red. Holgersson, Thörn, Thörn och Wahlström. Glänta Produktion.. - 9789186133153 ; , s. 181-188
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
