| 1. |
- Falkenström, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Development and Validation of a 6-item Working Alliance Questionnaire for Repeated Administrations During Psychotherapy
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Psychological Assessment. - : American Psychological Association. - 1040-3590 .- 1939-134X. ; 27:1, s. 169-183
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recently, researchers have started to measure the working alliance repeatedly across sessions of psychotherapy, relating the working alliance to symptom change session by session. Responding to questionnaires after each session can become tedious, leading to careless responses and/or increasing levels of missing data. Therefore, assessment with the briefest possible instrument is desirable. Because previous research on the Working Alliance Inventory has found the separation of the Goal and Task factors problematic, the present study examined the psychometric properties of a 2-factor, 6-item working alliance measure, adapted from the Working Alliance Inventory, in 3 patient samples (ns = 1,095, 235, and 234). Results showed that a bifactor model fit the data well across the 3 samples, and the factor structure was stable across 10 sessions of primary care counseling/psychotherapy. Although the bifactor model with 1 general and 2 specific factors outperformed the 1-factor model in terms of model fit, dimensionality analyses based on the bifactor model results indicated that in practice the instrument is best treated as unidimensional. Results support the use of composite scores of all 6 items. The instrument was validated by replicating previous findings of session-by-session prediction of symptom reduction using the Autoregressive Latent Trajectory model. The 6-item working alliance scale, called the Session Alliance Inventory, is a promising alternative for researchers in search for a brief alliance measure to administer after every session.
|
|
| 2. |
- Falkenström, Fredrik, Professor, 1972-, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient Attachment and Reflective Functioning as Predictors for Therapist In-Session Feelings
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of counseling psychology. - : American Psychological Association (APA). - 0022-0167 .- 1939-2168. ; 71:3, s. 190-201
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Therapists' in-session feelings in psychotherapy can be seen as indications of the development of the therapeutic relationship and the therapeutic process. To manage them appropriately, it is important to know to what extent they may be influenced by patients' pretreatment characteristics. This study aims to improve the understanding of therapists' emotional reactions in the psychotherapeutic setting by investigating if patients' pretreatment mentalization ability and attachment style predicted therapist in-session feelings. In a sample of 87 therapy dyads treated with interpersonal psychotherapy and cognitive behavioral therapy for depression, patient attachment was measured using self-reported Experiences in Close Relationships (ECR) and mentalization using Reflective Functioning (RF). ECR and RF were hypothesized to predict therapist feelings measured by the Feeling Word Checklist-24 at different treatment phases over the full course of treatment. Treatment method, patient age, gender, and pretreatment depression were evaluated as potential confounders. Multilevel modeling was used to analyze the data. Lower RF in patients predicted more negative therapist feelings in the mid- to late-treatment phases and less positive feelings in the late-treatment phase. Self-reported attachment anxiety or avoidance did not predict therapist feelings. Findings indicate that patients' ability to mentalize is important to consider when conducting psychotherapy, as it can influence therapists' feelings in the therapeutic process. Limitations of the present study's approach are discussed, and directions for future research are considered.
|
|
| 3. |
- Falkenström, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Therapeutic Alliance Predicts Symptomatic Improvement Session by Session
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of counseling psychology. - : American Psychological Association. - 0022-0167 .- 1939-2168. ; 60:3, s. 317-328
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The therapeutic alliance has been found to predict psychotherapy outcome in numerous studies. However, critics maintain that the therapeutic alliance is a by-product of prior symptomatic improvements. Moreover, almost all alliance research to date has used differences between patients in alliance as predictor of outcome, and results of such analyses do not necessarily mean that improving the alliance with a given patient will improve outcome (i.e., a within-patient effect). In a sample of 646 patients (76% women, 24% men) in primary care psychotherapy, the effect of working alliance on next session symptom level was analyzed using multilevel models. The Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation–Outcome Measure was used to measure symptom level, and the patient version of the Working Alliance Inventory–Short form revised (Hatcher & Gillaspy, 2006) was used to measure alliance. There was evidence for a reciprocal causal model, in which the alliance predicted subsequent change in symptoms while prior symptom change also affected the alliance. The alliance effect varied considerably between patients. This variation was partially explained by patients with personality problems showing stronger alliance effect. These results indicate that the alliance is not just a by-product of prior symptomatic improvements, even though improvement in symptoms is likely to enhance the alliance. Results also point to the importance of therapists paying attention to ruptures and repair of the therapy alliance. Generalization of results may be limited to relatively brief primary care psychotherapy.
|
|
| 4. |
- Falkenström, Fredrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Working alliance predicts psychotherapy outcome even while controlling for prior symptom improvement
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Psychotherapy Research. - : Routledge. - 1050-3307 .- 1468-4381. ; 24:2, s. 146-159
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Although the working alliance as been found to be a robust predictor of psychotherapy outcome, critics have questioned the causal status of this effect. Specifically, the effect of the alliance may be confounded with the effect of prior symptom improvement. The objective of the present study was to test this possibility. Method: A large dataset from primary care psychotherapy was used to study relationships between alliance and outcome using piecewise multilevel path analysis. Results: Initial symptom level and symptom change up to session three predicted the alliance at session three. Working alliance significantly predicted symptom change rate from session three to termination, even while controlling for several possible confounds. Conclusions: The alliance predicts outcome over and above the effect of prior symptom improvement, supporting a reciprocal influence model of the relationship between alliance and symptom change.
|
|
| 5. |
- Holmqvist Larsson, Mattias, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
Alliance ruptures and repairs in psychotherapy in primary care
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Psychotherapy Research. - : Routledge. - 1050-3307 .- 1468-4381. ; 28:1, s. 123-136
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: The association between alliance level and outcome in psychotherapy has been extensively studied. One way to expand this knowledge is to study alliance patterns. The main aims of this study were to examine how frequent alliance patterns with ruptures or rupture-repair episodes were in a naturalistic sample of psychotherapies in primary care, and if three alliance patterns (a Rupture pattern, a Repair pattern, and a No Rupture pattern) were differentially associated with treatment outcome.METHOD: The psychotherapies (N = 605) included a wide range of different treatment orientations and patient diagnoses. Alliance patterns were studied at session-to-session level, using patient-rated alliance scores. Outcome data were analyzed using longitudinal multilevel modeling with a slopes-as-outcomes model.RESULTS: The Repair pattern accounted for 14.7% (n = 89) of the treatments, 10.7% (n = 65) exhibited a Rupture pattern, and 74.5% (n = 451) contained no ruptures. The Rupture pattern was associated with inferior treatment outcomes. The Repair pattern was, in longer treatments, associated with better outcomes than the No Rupture pattern.CONCLUSIONS: The results support theory about the importance of ruptures in the therapeutic alliance and suggest that identification of alliance ruptures is important in alliance-outcome research, for feedback purposes in clinical practice, and in training of therapists.
|
|
| 6. |
- Holmqvist Larsson, Mattias, 1977-
(författare)
-
Rupture and Repair in the Working Alliance : Relation to Psychotherapy Outcome and Within-Session Interaction
- 2019
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Ruptures and repairs are processes related to shifts in the collaborative relationship Cthe working allianceJ between patient and therapist in psychotherapy. Ta study ruptures and repairs is one way ta disentangle mechanisms that might underlie the association between the working alliance and psychotherapy outcome. The overarching aim af this thesis was ta analyze the clinical relevance af the rupture and repair concepts at different process levels. The same three alliance patterns were investigated in the three empirical studies: the rupture pattern, the repair pattern, and the no-rupture/stable pattern. The analyses af the alliance patterns moved fromwhole treatments ta session segments. In Study I ruptures were found ta be associated with worse outcomes than treatments without ruptures. Repairs were, in longer therapies, shown ta be related ta better outcomes than norupture treatments. In Study Il it was found that the three alliance patterns could be discerned within sessions. Ruptures and repairs within sessions were found ta be associated with patient-ratings af the working alliance. In Study 111 the alliance patterns were found ta be related ta different interaction patterns within sessions. In these analyses, importont patient contributions ta repairs af ruptures were found.
|
|
| 7. |
- Holmqvist Larsson, Mattias, 1977-, et al.
(författare)
-
The Alliance and Rupture Observation Scale (AROS) : Development and validation of an alliance and rupture measure for repeated observations within psychotherapy sessions
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Psychology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0021-9762 .- 1097-4679. ; 75:3, s. 404-417
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The aim of this study was to test a new observer-rated instrument, the Alliance and Rupture Observation Scale (AROS). It was designed for repeated measurements of the alliance within sessions and to detect alliance ruptures.Method: Videotaped therapy sessions with depressed adults were analyzed. Reliability was mainly assessed as inter-rater reliability. Convergent, predictive, and discriminant validity of the AROS was assessed by comparing the instrument with both observer-rated and patient-rated measures.Results: The AROS exhibited excellent inter-rater reliability. Alliance levels measured with the AROS predicted patients’ ratings of the alliance in the same session and were highly correlated with another observer-rated alliance measure. Alliance patterns (rupture; repair; and no-rupture) based on AROS scores were significantly correlated with patients’ ratings of the alliance.Conclusions: Preliminary support for convergent and predictive validity was found. It is yet to be determined whether AROS scores are related to psychotherapy outcomes.
|
|
| 8. |
- Möller, Clara, et al.
(författare)
-
Mentalizing in Young Offenders
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Psychoanalytic psychology. - : American Psychological Association (APA). - 0736-9735 .- 1939-1331. ; 31:1, s. 84-99
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In order to prevent relapse into criminality, it is important to understand what precedes criminal behavior. Two earlier studies found deficits in mentalizing ability to be related to violent and criminal actions. Mentalizing refers to the ability to make human behavior predictable and meaningful by inferring mental states (thoughts, feelings, etc.) as explaining behavior. In this study, mentalizing ability was assessed by rating 42 Adult Attachment Interviews with young male offenders with the Reflective Functioning (RF) scale. In addition, specific mentalizing ability about their crimes was assessed, as well as psychopathy traits (Psychopathy Checklist, Screening Version [PCL: SV]) and alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale [TAS]). Results suggest impaired mentalizing in criminal offenders. Examples of anti- and prementalizing reasoning about crimes are presented. RF scores were not correlated with the PCL:SV or TAS.
|
|
| 9. |
- Söderberg, Anna Karin, et al.
(författare)
-
Emotional availability in psychotherapy : The usefulness and validity of the Emotional Availability Scales for analyzing the psychotherapeutic relationship
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Psychotherapy Research. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1050-3307 .- 1468-4381. ; 24:1, s. 91-102
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to assess whether a modified version of the Emotional Availability Scales (EAS), created to assess interaction quality between parents and children, could be applied to psychotherapy sessions and whether emotional availability (EA), as assessed by the modified EAS-T, was associated with client- and therapist-rated working alliance. EAS-T was used to assess 42 sessions from 16 therapies. The therapies came from the LURIPP project, comparing IPT with BRT for depressed clients. The results showed that sessions could be reliably rated with EAS-T. Most rating scales had acceptable variance. The client's perception of task alliance was associated with several of the EA subscales (sensitivity, nonhostility, responsiveness) assessed over therapies, whereas the perception of bond was associated with Structure on EAS.
|
|
| 10. |
- van der Pals, Jesper, et al.
(författare)
-
Characteristics and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome treated with ticagrelor and novel oral anticoagulants
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Thrombosis Update. - : Elsevier BV. - 2666-5727. ; 3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Optimal antithrombotic treatment after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in patients with atrial fibrillation is unclear. Data on outcomes in patients on concomitant ticagrelor and the novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) is scarce. This study therefore sought to describe patient characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and ACS treated with concomitant ticagrelor and NOACs (double antithrombotic therapy, DT). Materials and methods: We retrospectively identified all ACS patients with atrial fibrillation on DT upon discharge from Skåne University Hospital in Lund, Sweden, between 2016 and 2019. Identified patients were compared with age and sex matched controls with ACS alone treated with ticagrelor and aspirin (DAPT). Major bleeding was defined in accordance with the HAS-BLED derivation study. Patients were retrospectively followed for six months. Results: In total, 341 patients on DT were identified and compared with 341 controls on DAPT. Mean HAS-BLED bleeding risk score was higher in patients on DT (2.9 ± 1.0 vs 2.6+/0.9 units, p < 0.001; DT vs DAPT). The incidence of major bleeding was higher in patients on DT (31 (9.1%) vs 10 (2.9%), p = 0.001; DT vs DAPT), while a composite of all thrombotic events was found to be similar between the groups (8 (2.3%) vs 5 (1.5%), p = NS; DT vs DAPT). Conclusions: While thrombotic events occur at a similar rate, the bleeding rate is higher in patients with atrial fibrillation and ACS treated with DT than in patients with ACS alone treated with DAPT. Patients with atrial fibrillation also have a higher basal bleeding risk.
|
|
