| 2. |
- Zeiser, R., et al.
(författare)
-
Ruxolitinib in corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a multicenter survey
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Leukemia. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0887-6924 .- 1476-5551. ; 29:10, s. 2062-2068
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Despite major improvements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation over the past decades, corticosteroid-refractory (SR) acute (a) and chronic (c) graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) cause high mortality. Preclinical evidence indicates the potent anti-inflammatory properties of the JAK1/2 inhibitor ruxolitinib. In this retrospective survey, 19 stem cell transplant centers in Europe and the United States reported outcome data from 95 patients who had received ruxolitinib as salvage therapy for SR-GVHD. Patients were classified as having SR-aGVHD (n = 54, all grades III or IV) or SR-cGVHD (n = 41, all moderate or severe). The median number of previous GVHD-therapies was 3 for both SR-aGVHD (1-7) and SR-cGVHD (1-10). The overall response rate was 81.5% (44/54) in SR-aGVHD including 25 complete responses (46.3%), while for SR-cGVHD the ORR was 85.4% (35/41). Of those patients responding to ruxolitinib, the rate of GVHD-relapse was 6.8% (3/44) and 5.7% (2/35) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. The 6-month-survival was 79% (67.3-90.7%, 95% confidence interval (CI)) and 97.4% (92.3-100%, 95% CI) for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD, respectively. Cytopenia and cytomegalovirus-reactivation were observed during ruxolitinib treatment in both SR-aGVHD (30/54, 55.6% and 18/54, 33.3%) and SR-cGVHD (7/41, 17.1% and 6/41, 14.6%) patients. Ruxolitinib may constitute a promising new treatment option for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD that should be validated in a prospective trial.
|
|
| 3. |
- Scarisbrick, J.J., et al.
(författare)
-
U.K. consensus statement on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and chronic graft-versus-host disease
- 2008
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Dermatology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-0963 .- 1365-2133. ; 158:4, s. 659-678
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) has been used for over 30 years in the treatment of erythrodermic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) and over 20 years for chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD). The lack of prospective randomized trials has led to different centres having different patient selection criteria, treatment schedules, monitoring protocols and patient assessment criteria. ECP for CTCL and cGVHD is available only at six specialized centres across the U.K. In the recent Improving Outcomes Guidance the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence endorsed the use of ECP for CTCL and because of the complexity of treatment supported its use in specialized centres and also suggested the need for expansion of this service. In 2005 consultants and senior nurses from all U.K. sites and from Scandinavia formed a Photopheresis Expert Group. This group's first aim was to produce a consensus statement on the treatment of CTCL and cGVHD with ECP using evidence-based medicine and best medical practice, in order to standardize ECP eligibility, assessment and treatment strategies across the U.K.
|
|
