| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Holgersson, Johan, et al.
(author)
-
Hypothermic versus Normothermic Temperature Control after Cardiac Arrest
- 2022
-
In: NEJM Evidence. - 2766-5526. ; 1:11, s. 1-13
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUNDThe evidence for temperature control for comatose survivors of cardiac arrest is inconclusive. Controversy exists as to whether the effects of hypothermia differ per the circumstances of the cardiac arrest or patient characteristics.METHODSAn individual patient data meta-analysis of the Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac Arrest (TTM) and Hypothermia versus Normothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (TTM2) trials was conducted. The intervention was hypothermia at 33°C and the comparator was normothermia. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included poor functional outcome (modified Rankin scale score of 4 to 6) at 6 months. Predefined subgroups based on the design variables in the original trials were tested for interaction with the intervention as follows: age (older or younger than the median), sex (female or male), initial cardiac rhythm (shockable or nonshockable), time to return of spontaneous circulation (above or below the median), and circulatory shock on admission (presence or absence).RESULTSThe primary analyses included 2800 patients, with 1403 assigned to hypothermia and 1397 to normothermia. Death occurred for 691 of 1398 participants (49.4%) in the hypothermia group and 666 of 1391 participants (47.9%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.11; P=0.41). A poor functional outcome occurred for 733 of 1350 participants (54.3%) in the hypothermia group and 718 of 1330 participants (54.0%) in the normothermia group (relative risk with hypothermia, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94 to 1.08; P=0.88). Outcomes were consistent in the predefined subgroups.CONCLUSIONSHypothermia at 33°C did not decrease 6-month mortality compared with normothermia after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. (Funded by Vetenskapsrådet; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers NCT02908308 and NCT01020916.)
|
|
| 3. |
- Andréll, Cecilia, et al.
(author)
-
Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest at place of residence is associated with worse outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care : a post-hoc analysis of the Targeted Temperature Management trial
- 2019
-
In: Minerva Anestesiologica. - 1827-1596. ; 85:7
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The majority of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) occur at place residence, which is associated with worse outcomes in unselected prehospital populations. Our aim was to investigate whether location of arrest was associated with outcome in a selected group of initial survivors admitted to intensive care.METHODS: This is a post-hoc analysis of the Targeted Temperature Management after cardiac arrest trial (TTM trial), a multicenter controlled trial, randomizing 950 OHCA patients to an intervention of 33°C or 36°C. The location of cardiac arrest was defined as place of residence vs. public place or other. The outcome measures were mortality and neurological outcome, as defined by the Cerebral Performance Category scale, at 180 days.RESULTS: Approximately half of 938 included patients arrested at place of residence (53%). Location groups did not differ with respect to age (p=0.11) or witnessed arrests (p=0.48) but bystander CPR was less common (p=0.02) at place of residence. OHCA at place of residence was associated with higher 180-day mortality, 55% vs. 38% (p<0.001) and worse neurological outcome, 61% vs. 43% (p<0.001) compared with a public place or other. After adjusting for known confounders, OHCA at place of residence remained an independent predictor of mortality (p=0.007).CONCLUSIONS: Half of all initial survivors after OHCA admitted to intensive care had an at place of residence which was independently associated with poor outcomes. Actions improve outcomes after OHCA at place of residence should be addressed in future trials.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Cronberg, Tobias, et al.
(author)
-
Neurologic Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients Following Targeted Temperature Management at 33 degrees C vs 36 degrees C After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest A Randomized Clinical Trial
- 2015
-
In: JAMA Neurology. - : American Medical Association. - 2168-6149 .- 2168-6157. ; 72:6, s. 634-641
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- IMPORTANCE Brain injury affects neurologic function and quality of life in survivors after cardiac arrest. OBJECTIVE To compare the effects of 2 target temperature regimens on long-term cognitive function and quality of life after cardiac arrest. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this multicenter, international, parallel group, assessor-masked randomized clinical trial performed from November 11, 2010, through January 10, 2013, we enrolled 950 unconscious adults with cardiac arrest of presumed cardiac cause from 36 intensive care units in Europe and Australia. Eleven patients were excluded from analysis for a total sample size of 939. INTERVENTIONS Targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C vs 36 degrees C. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Cognitive function was measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and assessed by observers through the Informant Questionnaire on Cognitive Decline in the Elderly (IQCODE). Patients reported their activities in daily life and mental recovery through Two Simple Questions and their quality of life through the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, version 2. RESULTS In the modified intent-to-treat population, including nonsurvivors, the median MMSE score was 14 in the 33 degrees C group (interquartile range [IQR], 0-28) vs 17 in the 36 degrees C group (IQR, 0-29) (P = .77), and the IQCODE score was 115 (IQR, 79-130) vs 115 (IQR, 80-130) (P = .57) in the 33 degrees C and 36 degrees C groups, respectively. The median MMSE score for survivors was within the reference range and similar (33 degrees C group median, 28; IQR, 26-30; vs 36 degrees C group median, 28; IQR, 25-30; P = .61). The median IQCODE score was within the minor deficit range (33 degrees C group median, 79.5; IQR, 78.0-85.9; vs 36 degrees C group median, 80.7; IQR, 78.0-86.9; P = .04). A total of 18.8% vs 17.5% of survivors reported needing help with everyday activities (P = .71), and 66.5% in the 33 degrees C group vs 61.8% in the 36 degrees C group reported that they thought they had made a complete mental recovery (P = .32). The mean (SD) mental component summary score was 49.1 (12.5) vs 49.0 (12.2) (P = .79), and the mean (SD) physical component summary score was 46.8 (13.8) and 47.5 (13.8) (P = .45), comparable to the population norm. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Quality of life was good and similar in patients with cardiac arrest receiving targeted temperature management at 33 degrees C or 36 degrees C. Cognitive function was similar in both intervention groups, but many patients and observers reported impairment not detected previously by standard outcome scales.
|
|
| 6. |
- Düring, Joachim, et al.
(author)
-
Copeptin as a marker of outcome after cardiac arrest : A sub-study of the TTM trial
- 2020
-
In: Critical Care. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1364-8535. ; 24:1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Arginine vasopressin has complex actions in critically ill patients, involving vasoregulatory status, plasma volume, and cortisol levels. Copeptin, a surrogate marker for arginine vasopressin, has shown promising prognostic features in small observational studies and is used clinically for early rule out of acute coronary syndrome. The objective of this study was to explore the association between early measurements of copeptin, circulatory status, and short-term survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Methods: Serial blood samples were collected at 24, 48, and 72 h as part of the target temperature management at 33 °C versus 36 °C after cardiac arrest trial, an international multicenter randomized trial where unconscious survivors after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were allocated to an intervention of 33 or 36 °C for 24 h. Primary outcome was 30-day survival with secondary endpoints circulatory cause of death and cardiovascular deterioration composite; in addition, we examined the correlation with extended the cardiovascular sequential organ failure assessment (eCvSOFA) score. Results: Six hundred ninety patients were included in the analyses, of whom 203 (30.3%) developed cardiovascular deterioration within 24 h, and 273 (39.6%) died within 30 days. Copeptin measured at 24 h was found to be independently associated with 30-day survival, hazard ratio 1.17 [1.06-1.28], p = 0.001; circulatory cause of death, odds ratio 1.03 [1.01-1.04], p = 0.001; and cardiovascular deterioration composite, odds ratio of 1.05 [1.02-1.08], p < 0.001. Copeptin at 24 h was correlated with eCvSOFA score with rho 0.19 [0.12-0.27], p < 0.001. Conclusion: Copeptin is an independent marker of severity of the post cardiac arrest syndrome, partially related to circulatory failure. Trial registration: Clinical Trials, NCT01020916. Registered November 26, 2009.
|
|
| 7. |
- Ebner, Florian, et al.
(author)
-
Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 for the prediction of neurological outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients
- 2020
-
In: Resuscitation. - : Elsevier BV. - 0300-9572. ; 154, s. 61-68
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objective: Neurological outcome prediction is crucial early after cardiac arrest. Serum biomarkers released from brain cells after hypoxic-ischaemic injury may aid in outcome prediction. The only serum biomarker presently recommended in the European Resuscitation Council prognostication guidelines is neuron-specific enolase (NSE), but NSE has limitations. In this study, we therefore analyzed the outcome predictive accuracy of the serum biomarkers glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) in patients after cardiac arrest. Methods: Serum GFAP and UCH-L1 were collected at 24, 48 and 72 h after cardiac arrest. The primary outcome was neurological function at 6-month follow-up assessed by the cerebral performance category scale (CPC), dichotomized into good (CPC1-2) and poor (CPC3-5). Prognostic accuracies were tested with receiver-operating characteristics by calculating the area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC) and compared to the AUROC of NSE. Results: 717 patients were included in the study. GFAP and UCH-L1 discriminated between good and poor neurological outcome at all time-points when used alone (AUROC GFAP 0.88–0.89; UCH-L1 0.85–0.87) or in combination (AUROC 0.90–0.91). The combined model was superior to GFAP and UCH-L1 separately and NSE (AUROC 0.75–0.85) at all time-points. At specificities ≥95%, the combined model predicted poor outcome with a higher sensitivity than NSE at 24 h and with similar sensitivities at 48 and 72 h. Conclusion: GFAP and UCH-L1 predicted poor neurological outcome with high accuracy. Their combination may be of special interest for early prognostication after cardiac arrest where it performed significantly better than the currently recommended biomarker NSE.
|
|
| 8. |
- Grand, Johannes, et al.
(author)
-
Mean arterial pressure during targeted temperature management and renal function after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
- 2019
-
In: Journal of Critical Care. - : Elsevier BV. - 0883-9441. ; 50, s. 234-241
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Purpose: This study investigates the association between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and renal function after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Materials and methods: Post-hoc analysis of 851 comatose OHCA-patients surviving >48 h included in the targeted temperature management (TTM)-trial. Results: Patients were stratified by mean MAP during TTM in the following groups; <70 mmHg (22%), 70–80 mmHg (43%), and > 80 mmHg (35%). Median (interquartile range) eGFR (ml/min/1.73 m2) 48 h after OHCA was inversely associated with MAP-group (70 (47–102), 84 (56–113), 94 (61–124), p <.001, for the <70-group, 70–80-group and > 80-group respectively). After adjusting for potential confounders, in a mixed model including eGFR after 1, 2 and 3 days this association remained significant (pgroup_adjusted = 0.0002). Higher mean MAP was independently associated with lower odds of renal replacement therapy (odds ratioadjusted = 0.77 [95% confidence interval, 0.65–0.91] per 5 mmHg increase; p =.002]). Conclusions: Low mean MAP during TTM was independently associated with decreased renal function and need of renal replacement therapy in a large cohort of comatose OHCA-patients. Increasing MAP above the recommended 65 mmHg could potentially be renal-protective. This hypothesis should be investigated in prospective trials.
|
|
| 9. |
- Lagebrant, Alice, et al.
(author)
-
Brain injury markers in blood predict signs of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy on head computed tomography after cardiac arrest
- 2023
-
In: Resuscitation. - : Elsevier. - 0300-9572 .- 1873-1570. ; 184
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background/Aim: Signs of hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) on head computed tomography (CT) predicts poor neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. We explore whether levels of brain injury markers in blood could predict the likelihood of HIE on CT.Methods: Retrospective analysis of CT performed at 24-168 h post cardiac arrest on clinical indication within the Target Temperature Management after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-trial. Biomarkers prospectively collected at 24-and 48 h post-arrest were analysed for neuron specific enolase (NSE), neurofilament light (NFL), total-tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). HIE was assessed through visual evaluation and quantitative grey-white-matter ratio (GWR) was retrospectively calculated on Swedish subjects with original images available.Results: In total, 95 patients were included. The performance to predict HIE on CT (performed at IQR 73-116 h) at 48 h was similar for all biomark-ers, assessed as area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) NSE 0.82 (0.71-0.94), NFL 0.79 (0.67-0.91), total-tau 0.84 (0.74- 0.95), GFAP 0.79 (0.67-0.90). The predictive performance of biomarker levels at 24 h was AUC 0.72-0.81. At 48 h biomarker levels below Youden Index accurately excluded HIE in 77.3-91.7% (negative predictive value) and levels above Youden Index correctly predicted HIE in 73.3-83.7% (positive predictive value). NSE cut-off at 48 h was 48 ng/ml. Elevated biomarker levels irrespective of timepoint significantly correlated with lower GWR.Conclusion: Biomarker levels can assess the likelihood of a patient presenting with HIE on CT and could be used to select suitable patients for CT-examination during neurological prognostication in unconscious cardiac arrest patients.
|
|
| 10. |
- Lilja, Gisela, et al.
(author)
-
Cognitive function after cardiac arrest and temperature management; rationale and description of a sub-study in the Target Temperature Management trial
- 2013
-
In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2261. ; 13
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Mild to moderate cognitive impairment is common amongst long-term survivors of cardiac arrest. In the Target Temperature Management trial (TTM-trial) comatose survivors were randomized to 33 degrees C or 36 degrees C temperature control for 24 hours after cardiac arrest and the effects on survival and neurological outcome assessed. This protocol describes a sub-study of the TTM-trial investigating cognitive dysfunction and its consequences for patients' and relatives' daily life. Methods/Design: Sub-study sites in five European countries included surviving TTM patients 180 days after cardiac arrest. In addition to the instruments for neurological function used in the main trial, sub-study patients were specifically tested for difficulties with memory (Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test), attention (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) and executive function (Frontal Assessment Battery). Cognitive impairments will be related to the patients' degree of participation in society (Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4), health related quality of life (Short Form Questionnaire-36v2 (c)), and the caregivers' situation (Zarit Burden Interview (c)). The two intervention groups (33 degrees C and 36 degrees C) will be compared with a group of myocardial infarction controls. Discussion: This large international sub-study of a randomized controlled trial will focus on mild to moderate cognitive impairment and its consequences for cardiac arrest survivors and their caregivers. By using an additional battery of tests we may be able to detect more subtle differences in cognitive function between the two intervention groups than identified in the main study. The results of the study could be used to develop a relevant screening model for cognitive dysfunction after cardiac arrest.
|
|
