| 1. |
- Gasser, T. Christian, et al.
(författare)
-
A novel strategy to translate the biomechanical rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms to their equivalent diameter risk : Method and retrospective validation
- 2014
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 47:3, s. 288-295
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To translate the individual abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patient's biomechanical rupture risk profile to risk-equivalent diameters, and to retrospectively test their predictability in ruptured and non-ruptured aneurysms. Methods: Biomechanical parameters of ruptured and non-ruptured AAAs were retrospectively evaluated in a multicenter study. General patient data and high resolution computer tomography angiography (CTA) images from 203 non-ruptured and 40 ruptured aneurysmal infrarenal aortas. Three-dimensional AAA geometries were semi-automatically derived from CTA images. Finite element (FE) models were used to predict peak wall stress (PWS) and peak wall rupture index (PWRI) according to the individual anatomy, gender, blood pressure, intraluminal thrombus (ILT) morphology, and relative aneurysm expansion. Average PWS diameter and PWRI diameter responses were evaluated, which allowed for the PWS equivalent and PWRI equivalent diameters for any individual aneurysm to be defined. Results: PWS increased linearly and PWRI exponentially with respect to maximum AAA diameter. A size-adjusted analysis showed that PWS equivalent and PWRI equivalent diameters were increased by 7.5 mm (p = .013) and 14.0 mm (p < .001) in ruptured cases when compared to non-ruptured controls, respectively. In non-ruptured cases the PWRI equivalent diameters were increased by 13.2 mm (p < .001) in females when compared with males. Conclusions: Biomechanical parameters like PWS and PWRI allow for a highly individualized analysis by integrating factors that influence the risk of AAA rupture like geometry (degree of asymmetry, ILT morphology, etc.) and patient characteristics (gender, family history, blood pressure, etc.). PWRI and the reported annual risk of rupture increase similarly with the diameter. PWRI equivalent diameter expresses the PWRI through the diameter of the average AAA that has the same PWRI, i.e. is at the same biomechanical risk of rupture. Consequently, PWRI equivalent diameter facilitates a straightforward interpretation of biomechanical analysis and connects to diameter-based guidelines for AAA repair indication. PWRI equivalent diameter reflects an additional diagnostic parameter that may provide more accurate clinical data for AAA repair indication.
|
|
| 2. |
- Erhart, P., et al.
(författare)
-
Finite Element Analysis in Asymptomatic, Symptomatic, and Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms : In Search of New Rupture Risk Predictors
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 49:3, s. 239-245
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To compare biomechanical rupture risk parameters of asymptomatic, symptomatic and ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) using finite element analysis (FEA). Study design: Retrospective biomechanical single center analysis of asymptomatic, symptomatic, and ruptured AAAs. Comparison of biomechanical parameters from FEA. Materials and methods: From 2011 to 2013 computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 30 asymptomatic, 15 symptomatic, and 15 ruptured AAAs were collected consecutively. FEA was performed according to the successive steps of AAA vessel reconstruction, segmentation and finite element computation. Biomechanical parameters Peak Wall Rupture Risk Index (PWRI), Peak Wall Stress (PWS), and Rupture Risk Equivalent Diameter (RRED) were compared among the three subgroups. Results: PWRI differentiated between asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs (p < .0004) better than PWS (p < .1453). PWRI-dependent RRED was higher in the symptomatic subgroup compared with the asymptomatic subgroup (p < .0004). Maximum AAA external diameters were comparable between the two groups (p < .1355). Ruptured AAAs showed the highest values for external diameter, total intraluminal thrombus volume, PWS, RRED, and PWRI compared with asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs. In contrast with symptomatic and ruptured AAAs, none of the asymptomatic patients had a PWRI value >1.0. This threshold value might identify patients at imminent risk of rupture: Conclusions: From different FEA derived parameter, PWRI distinguishes most precisely between asymptomatic and symptomatic AAAs. If elevated, this value may represent a negative prognostic factor for asymptomatic AAAs.
|
|
| 3. |
- Erhart, P., et al.
(författare)
-
Finite-Elemente-Analyse abdomineller Aortenaneurysmen : Aktuelle Wertigkeit als Ergänzung zur herkömmlichen Diagnostik
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Gefässchirurgie. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0948-7034 .- 1434-3932. ; 20:7, s. 503-507
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Finite element analysis (FEA) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) could enable a more precise patient-specific risk assessment of AAA rupture. Further clinical studies are needed to validate this model as a clinical decision-making tool. The A4clinics™ software provides a simple and detailed FEA simulation. After implementation of a FEA workstation in a high volume university vascular center, relevant studies for further model validation are expected to be carried out.
|
|
| 4. |
- Erhart, P, et al.
(författare)
-
Prediction of Rupture Sites in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms After Finite Element Analysis
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists. - : SAGE Publications. - 1545-1550. ; 23:1, s. 115-120
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: To associate regions of highest local rupture risk from finite element analysis (FEA) to subsequent rupture sites in abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Methods: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed computed tomography angiography (CTA) data from 13 asymptomatic AAA patients (mean age 76 years; 8 men) experiencing rupture at a later point in time between 2005 and 2011. All patients had CTA scans before and during the rupture event. FEA was performed to calculate peak wall stress (PWS), peak wall rupture risk (PWRR), rupture risk equivalent diameters (RRED), and the intraluminal thrombus volume (ILTV). PWS and PWRR locations in the prerupture state were compared with subsequent CTA rupture findings. Visible contrast extravasation was considered a definite (n=5) rupture sign, while a periaortic hematoma was an indefinite (n=8) sign. A statistical comparison was performed between the 13-patient asymptomatic AAA group before and during rupture and a 23-patient diameter-matched asymptomatic AAA control group that underwent elective surgery. Results: The asymptomatic AAAs before rupture showed significantly higher PWRR and RRED values compared to the matched asymptomatic AAA control group (median values 0.74 vs 0.52 and 77 vs 59 mm, respectively; p<0.0001 for both). No statistical differences could be found for PWS and ILTV. Ruptured AAAs showed the highest maximum diameters, PWRR, and RRED values. In 7 of the ruptured AAAs (2 definite and 5 indefinite rupture signs), CTA rupture sites correlated with prerupture PWRR locations. Conclusion: The location of the PWRR in unruptured AAAs predicted future rupture sites in several cases. Asymptomatic AAA patients with high PWRR and RRED values have an increased rupture risk.
|
|
| 5. |
- Hyhlik-Dürr, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Finite Element Analysis of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms : Preliminary Results of Intra and Inter observer Validation
- 2010
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is indicated if risk for rupture exceeds the risk for aortic repair. Estimation of the individual risk for rupture in AAA is therefore essential. The diameter of AAA is known as an independent risk factor for rupture and therefore the base of indication for surgical or endovascular therapy. For more sensitive patient selection, other morphological or hemodynamic predictors such as volume or peak wall stress have to be evaluated. The purpose of this study was to analyze the reproducibility of diameter measurement, volume estimation and peak wall stress calculation in AAA by finite element analysis. Methods: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) scans of 10 patients with AAA and 4 volunteers with healthy infrarenal aortas were analyzed by three independent investigators. A semiautomatic reconstruction using two- and three-dimensional deformable (active) contour models was used to segment vascular bodies from CTA data. Centreline calculated maximal diameter and volume measurements, as extracted from the reconstructed abdominal aorta, as well as peak wall stress, as predicted by three-dimensional non-linear finite element models, were analyzed. Specifically, aortic wall and thrombus tissue were captured by isotropic, non-linear and finite strain constitutive models. Likewise, mean arterial pressure was applied at the luminal surface, the vessels were fixed at the renal arteries and the aortic bifurcation and no contact with surrounding organs was considered. Inter- and intra-observer variabilities for diameter, volume and peak wall stress measurements were assessed by calculating the coefficient of variation (CV=SD*100/mean in %) of the five fold determinations. The methodological variation was expressed as deviation of diameter (mm), volume (ml) and peak wall stress (kPa) amongst the three observers. Results: Reproducibility measurements in healthy vessels of aortic diameters between 16.1mm to 16.6mm varied from CV=2.5% to CV=4.9%. Abdominal aortic volumes of 14ml to 15ml were measured in the healthy cohort with a reproducibility of CV=5.8% to CV=11.5%. Peak wall stress varied between 53 kPa and 55 kPa, where CV ranged from 3-13%. Inter-observer variation was <10% for diameter, volume and peak stress in healthy volunteers. Aortic diameter in three AAAs was measured to 58.9 mm; 54.6 mm; and 71.2 mm respectively. The coefficient of variation showed high agreement with values less than 5%. AAA volume varied between 130 ml and 300 ml (CV < 10%) and Peak wall stress was predicted between 172 kPa and 296 kPa (CV <10%). Variability between the 3 observers in AAA measurements was 0.7 mm – 6.0 mm for diameter, 11 – 28 ml for volume and 4-27 kPa for peak wall stress, respectively. Conclusions: Volume and diameter measurements based on geometrical models reconstructed from CTA scans showed quit good reproducibility for serial measurements in normal and degenerative arteries. Peak wall stress predictions exhibited high accordance between different observers, and in serial measurements within one observer. Volume and peak wall stress analysis could be an additionally module for assessment of individual rupture risk in AAA in the future, which however needs to be validated by additional studies.
|
|
| 6. |
- Hyhlik-Dürr, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Finite-Elemente-Analyse abdomineller Aortenaneurysmen : Erste Ergebnisse der Intra- und Interobserver Validierung
- 2010
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Hintergrund: Die Therapie des abdominellen Aortenaneurysmas (AAA) ist indiziert, wenn das Rupturrisiko das Risiko der elektiven Operation übersteigt. Die Abschätzung des individuellen Rupturrisikos gilt als Basis der Indikationsstellung zur offenen oder endovaskulären Chirurgie. Bisher wird der Durchmesser des AAA als maßgeblicher Risikofaktor für die Ruptur herangezogen. Für eine sensitivere Indikationsstellung sollten jedoch andere morphologische oder biomechanische Faktoren wie die Volumenveränderung im Verlauf und/oder die Wandspannung im Aneurysma untersucht werden. Ziel dieser Studie ist die Analyse der Reproduzierbarkeit der Durchmesserbestimmung sowie der Volumen- und Wandspannungsberechnung anhand eines geometrischen Modells, basierend auf der Finite Elemente Methode. Methode: Computertomographische Daten von vier gesunden und zehn Patienten mit infrarenalen abdominellen Aneurysmen werden von drei unabhängigen Untersuchern analysiert. Die abdominelle Aorta wird semiautomatisch von Computertomographie-Angiographie (CTA) Bilddaten segmentiert, wobei zwei und drei-dimensionale aktive Konturmodelle, wie sie aus der Bildverarbeitung bekannt sind, zum Einsatz kommen. Der maximale Durchmesser (cernterline-basiert) sowie das aortale Volumen werden aus den rekonstruierten dreidimensionalen Modellen berechnet. Zusätzlich werden nicht-lineare Finite Elemente Modelle verwendet, um die mechanische Spannung in der Aortenwand zwischen der Aortenbifurkation und den Nierenarterien zu bestimmen. Zu diesen Zweck wird der mittlere arterielle Druck als Belastung angenommen und nicht-lineare isotrope Materialmodelle erfassen die mechanischen Eigenschaften der Aortenwand und des Thrombusgewebes. Die Intra- und Interobserver Variabilität der fünf Messungen des maximalen Durchmessers, des Volumens und der maximalen Wandspannung wurden durch die Berechnung des Variationskoeffizienten (CV=SD*100/Arithmethisches Mittel in %) ausgedrückt. Die methodische Variation berechnet sich aus der Abweichung des Duchmessers (mm), des Volumens (ml) und der maximalen Wandspannung (kPA) zwischen den drei Untersuchern. Ergebnisse: Die Reproduzierbarkeit gesunder Gefäßen lag bei einem Durchmesser zwischen 16.1mm und 16.6mm zwischen CV=2,5% und CV=4,9%. Das aortale Volumen lag zwischen 14ml und 15ml, die Reproduzierbarkeit bei den gesunden Gefäßen streute zwischen CV=5.8% und CV=11.5%. Die maximale Wandspannung variierte zwischen 53 kPA and 55 kPa, der CV% lag hierbei zwischen 3 und 13. Die Interobserver Variabilität lag < 10% für den Durchmesser, die Volumenbestimmung und die Bestimmung der maximale Wandspannung. Der maximale Durchmesser der Aorta bei 3 Patienten mit infrarenalem Aneurysma wurde mit durchschnittlich 58.9mm, 54.6mm und 71.2mm berechnet (Stand bei Abstracteinreichung). Der Variationskoeffizient zeigte dabei eine hohe Übereinstimmung mit Werten unter 5%. Das Volumen der Aneurysmen schwankte zwischen 130 ml und 300 ml (CV<10%), die berechnete Wandspannung lag zwischen 172 kPA und 296 kPA (CV<10%). Die Variabilität zwischen den drei Untersuchern betrug 0,7-6,0 mm für den Durchmesser, 11-28 ml für das Volumen und 4-27 kPA für die maximale Wandspannung. Zusammenfassung: Sowohl an gesunden als auch an degenerativ veränderten Gefäßen ergibt die Reproduzierbarkeit des Aortendurchmessers und des aortalen Volumens basierend auf dem dreidimensionalen rekonstruierten Modellen eine hohe Übereinstimmung. Die berechnete Wandspannung basierend auf den Finiten Elemente Modellen zeigt einen geringen Grad an Variabilität sowohl zwischen verschiedenen Untersuchern als auch bei wiederholter Messung. Daher könnten die Volumenbestimmung und die Analyse der Wandspannung zusätzliche Größen bei der Bestimmung des individuellen Rupturrisikos bei Patienten mit Aortenaneurysmen darstellen, um eine präzisere Indikationsstellung zu ermöglichen.
|
|
