| 1. |
- Jenkins-Smith, Hank C., et al.
(författare)
-
New perspectives on nuclear waste management
- 2010
-
Ingår i: Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy. - 1944-4079. ; 1:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper outlines the evolution of the global public policy debate concerning the management and disposal of used nuclear fuel, with particular attention to the central points of contention that have shaped that debate. Utilizing the experience in Sweden and the U.S., we provide a frame for the application of a diverse range of social science perspectives (including law) to the used nuclear fuel policy debate, and introduce a set of papers that apply those perspectives.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
The Advocacy Coalition Framework: : An Overview of the Research Program
- 2017. - 4
-
Ingår i: Theories of the Policy Process. - Boulder : Westview Press. - 9780813350523 - 9780813350783 ; , s. 135-171
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- "A comprehensive primer to the major contemporary theoretical frameworks used in policy process research written by leading public policy scholars"--
|
|
| 5. |
- Nohrstedt, Daniel, 1974-, et al.
(författare)
-
The Advocacy Coalition Framework : Progress and Emerging Areas
- 2023. - 5
-
Ingår i: Theories of the Policy Process. - London : Routledge. - 9781032311241 ; , s. 130-150
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) remains one of the most established and applied approaches to studying policy processes. This chapter provides an overview of the ACF, including its assumptions and theories of advocacy coalitions, policy-oriented learning, and policy change. In doing so, it summarizes what is known about the policy processes under this approach based on the empirical applications that span the globe on various topics and using diverse methods. The chapter ends by identifying emerging areas ripe for continued development and offering advice to people interested in contributing to the ACF’s research program.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Weible, Christopher M., et al.
(författare)
-
Sharpening Advocacy Coalitions
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Policy Studies Journal. - : Wiley. - 0190-292X .- 1541-0072. ; 48:4, s. 1054-1081
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The concept of “advocacy coalitions” is the bedrock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), one of the most established and successful approaches for understanding policy processes across the globe. This article revisits and sharpens the conceptual definition of advocacy coalitions. We summarize the lessons from its theoretical emphases under the ACF and specify its five attributes (policy actors, shared beliefs, coordination, resources, and stability). Through this specification, we identify the ideal coalition type and several coalition subtypes. We then clarify and make a distinction between how we think about coalitions as a concept and how we approach coalitions empirically. This article sharpens the lens for describing and explaining coalitions toward better observations, theorizing, and measurements. It ends with next steps for further deepening and broadening knowledge about advocacy coalitions.
|
|
