| 1. |
- Groenen, M. A., et al.
(författare)
-
Analyses of pig genomes provide insight into porcine demography and evolution
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Nature. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0028-0836 .- 1476-4687. ; 491:7424, s. 393-398
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- For 10,000 years pigs and humans have shared a close and complex relationship. From domestication to modern breeding practices, humans have shaped the genomes of domestic pigs. Here we present the assembly and analysis of the genome sequence of a female domestic Duroc pig (Sus scrofa) and a comparison with the genomes of wild and domestic pigs from Europe and Asia. Wild pigs emerged in South East Asia and subsequently spread across Eurasia. Our results reveal a deep phylogenetic split between European and Asian wild boars approximately 1 million years ago, and a selective sweep analysis indicates selection on genes involved in RNA processing and regulation. Genes associated with immune response and olfaction exhibit fast evolution. Pigs have the largest repertoire of functional olfactory receptor genes, reflecting the importance of smell in this scavenging animal. The pig genome sequence provides an important resource for further improvements of this important livestock species, and our identification of many putative disease-causing variants extends the potential of the pig as a biomedical model.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Roseman, C., et al.
(författare)
-
Persistent pain and its predictors after starting anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy in psoriatic arthritis : what is the role of inflammation control?
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology. - 0300-9742 .- 1502-7732. ; 53:2, s. 94-103
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: While considerable focus has been placed on pain due to inflammation in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), less is reported on pain despite inflammation control. Here, we aimed to investigate the occurrence/predictors of persistent pain, including non-inflammatory components, after starting anti-tumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy. Method: Bionaïve PsA patients starting a first anti-TNF therapy 2004–2010 were identified (South Swedish Arthritis Treatment Group register; N = 351). Outcomes included unacceptable pain [visual analogue scale (VAS) pain > 40 mm], and unacceptable pain despite inflammation control (refractory pain; VAS pain > 40 mm + C-reactive protein < 10 mg/L + ≤ 1 swollen joint of 28), assessed at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. Baseline predictors were estimated by logistic regression. Results: Upon starting anti-TNF therapy, 85% of patients reported unacceptable pain, falling to 43% at 3 months and then remaining stable. After 12 months, refractory pain constituted 63% of all unacceptable pain. Higher baseline VAS pain/global, worse physical function and lower health-related quality-of-life were associated with a higher risk of unacceptable/refractory pain at 12 months. More swollen joints and higher evaluator’s global assessment were associated with a lower risk of 12-month refractory pain. Conclusions: A substantial proportion of PsA patients reported unacceptable pain throughout the first anti-TNF treatment year. At 12 months, refractory pain constituted about two-thirds of this remaining pain load. More objective signs of inflammation at anti-TNF initiation were associated with less future refractory pain. This highlights insufficient effect of biologics in patients with inflammation-independent pain, warranting alternative treatments.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Fragoulis, George E., et al.
(författare)
-
2022 EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in adults with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 82:6, s. 742-753
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To develop EULAR recommendations for screening and prophylaxis of chronic and opportunistic infections in patients with autoimmune inflammatory rheumatic diseases (AIIRD). Methods: An international Task Force (TF) (22 members/15 countries) formulated recommendations, supported by systematic literature review findings. Level of evidence and grade of recommendation were assigned for each recommendation. Level of agreement was provided anonymously by each TF member. Results: Four overarching principles (OAP) and eight recommendations were developed. The OAPs highlight the need for infections to be discussed with patients and with other medical specialties, in accordance with national regulations. In addition to biologic/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for which screening for latent tuberculosis (TB) should be performed, screening could be considered also before conventional synthetic DMARDs, glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants. Interferon gamma release assay should be preferred over tuberculin skin test, where available. Hepatitis B (HBV) antiviral treatment should be guided by HBV status defined prior to starting antirheumatic drugs. All patients positive for hepatitis-C-RNA should be referred for antiviral treatment. Also, patients who are non-immune to varicella zoster virus should be informed about the availability of postexposure prophylaxis should they have contact with this pathogen. Prophylaxis against Pneumocystis jirovecii seems to be beneficial in patients treated with daily doses >15-30 mg of prednisolone or equivalent for >2-4 weeks. Conclusions: These recommendations provide guidance on the screening and prevention of chronic and opportunistic infections. Their adoption in clinical practice is recommended to standardise and optimise care to reduce the burden of opportunistic infections in people living with AIIRD.
|
|
| 8. |
- Frodlund, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Predictors Of Antibody Response To Covid-19 Vaccine In Rituximab Treated Patients With Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. A Swedish Nationwide Study (Covid19-Reuma)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81, s. 368-369
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In line with other reports, our group showed that patients treated with rituximab had significant impaired antibody response compared to patients treated with other biologic and targeted and synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD).ObjectivesTo investigate predictors of response to COVID-19 vaccination (2 doses of mRNA vaccines, 2 doses of virus vector vaccines or combinations of these) in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) treated with rituximab and controls.MethodsAntibody levels to three antigens: Spike protein full length, Spike S1 and Nucleocapsid C-terminal fragment (to confirm previous COVID-19 infection) were measured in sera collected before vaccination and 2-12 weeks after the second vaccine using a multiplex bead-based serology assay. The antigen-specific cut-off was defined as the median fluorescence intensity signal plus 6x standard deviations across 12 pre-pandemic controls. A good vaccine response was defined as having antibodies over the cut-off level for both spike antigens. Proportion (%) responders was compared between patients and controls (Chi2 test).Patients with IRD receiving last rituximab treatment within a mean (range) 193 (23-501) days before first vaccination participated. Individuals without IRD served as a control group. Predictors of a good vaccine response were explored using multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, disease duration, diagnosis (systemic vasculitis/RA/JIA/other), concomitant csDMARD, rituximab dose and prednisolone dose. Hazard ratio (chanse) of a good antibody response in relation to time between the last rituximab treatment and vaccination was studied by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.ResultsIn total, 145 patients receiving rituximab and 61 controls were inclyded. Of these, 82 received rituximab as monotherapy (67% women; mean age 66 years, mean disease duration 13 years; 33% had RA/JIA and 60% vasculitis) and 63 received rituximab+csDMARD (62% women; mean age 66 years; mean disease duration 17 years; 76% had RA/JIA and 10 % vasculitis). Controls (n=61) were 74% women and mean age 49 years. Compared to controls, rituximab patients had lower antibody levels for both spike proteins (p<0.001). Proportion (%) responders among patients receiving rituximab as monotherapy (40.2%) and rituximab+DMARDs (25.4%) was significantly lower than in controls (98.4%) (p<0.001, Chi2). Higher age, concomitant csDMARD at vaccination and shorter time from last rituximab treatment predicted impaired antibody response (multivariate logistic regression model) (Table 1). Longer time between the last rituximab course and vaccination was associated with better antibody response (Figure 1).Table 1.Predictors of good antibody response to two doses of COVID-19 vaccine defined as antibodies over the cut-off level for both spike antigensBp-valueOR95% CIAge at vaccination (years)-0.040.0090.960.93-0.99Sex (male/female)-9.550.2090.580.24-1.36csDMARD at vaccination (yes/no)-1.080.0260.340.13-0.88Prednisolone (mg/dag)-0.100.1030.900.80-1.02Rituximab dos (1000 mg vs 500 mg)-0.010.3700.990.99-1.00Time between the last rituximab and vaccination (months)0.200.0011.311.11-1.55Diagnosis at vaccination (systemic vasculitis vs others)-0.510.3150.600.21-1.64Figure 1.The chance of good antibody response following two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in relation to time between the last rituximab course and vaccination.ConclusionPatients with IRD getting vaccinated with two doses of COVID19 vaccine during the treatment with rituximab have the ability to develop antibody response although the response is impaired. For each month passed after the last rituximab course, the chance of good antibody response increases with 30%. Younger patients receiving rituximab as monotherapy and vaccinated preferably several months after the last rituximab treatment have the highest chance of achieving a good antibody response.AcknowledgementsUnrestricted research grants have been received from Roche and starting grants from The Swedish Rheumatism AssociationDisclosure of InterestsMartina Frodlund: None declared, Katerina Chatzidionysiou Consultant of: consultancy fees from Eli Lilly, AbbVie and Pfizer., Anna Södergren: None declared, Eva Klingberg: None declared, Monika Hansson: None declared, Elisa Pin: None declared, Sophie Olsson: None declared, Anders Bengtsson: None declared, Lars Klareskog Grant/research support from: has eceived research grants from Pfizer, BMS, Affibody, Sonoma Biotherapeutics, Meliha C Kapetanovic Consultant of: have received consultancy fees from Abbvie, Pfizer and GSK, Grant/research support from: have received unrestricted research grants from Roche and Pfizer
|
|
| 9. |
- Frodlund, M, et al.
(författare)
-
THE IMPACT OF IMMUNOMODULATING TREATMENT ON THE IMMUNOGENICITY OF COVID-19 VACCINES IN PATIENTS WITH IMMUNE-MEDIATED INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASES COMPARED TO HEALTHY CONTROLS. A SWEDISH NATIONWIDE STUDY (COVID19-REUMA)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 81, s. 113-114
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Initial studies on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) reported diminished antibody response in general, and particularly when treated with rituximab or abatacept (1). Additional data are needed, especially for patients with IRD and immunomodulatory treatments.ObjectivesTo elucidate the antibody response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with IRD treated with biologic or targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs) as monotherapy or combined with conventional synthetic DMARDS (csDMARDs).MethodsAntibodies against two antigens representing Spike full length protein and Spike S1 and a Nucleocapsid C-terminal fragment (used to confirm previously COVID-19 infection) were measured in serum obtained before and after the second vaccination using a multiplex bead-based serology assay (2). Patients with IRD receiving immunomodulating treatment, followed at a rheumatology department and healthy individuals (controls) were recruited from five Swedish regions. Antibody positivity was classified as the signal passing an antigen specific cutoff based on the mean intensity signal of 12 selected negative pre-pandemic controls plus 6SD for Spike/S1 and 12SD for Nucleocapsid-C. Good vaccine response was defined as having antibodies over cut-off level for both spike antigens. Percentage of responders in each treatment group was compared to controls (Chi2 test). Predictors of antibody response were determined using logistic regression analysis.ResultsIn total, 414 patients (320 RA/JIA/psoriatic arthritis/axial spondylarthritis, 60 systemic vasculitis and 32 other IRD) and 61 controls participated. Patients receiving rituximab (n=145; 65% female; mean age 65years), abatacept (n=21; 77% female; mean age 66 years), IL6 inhibitors (n=77; 74% female; mean age 64years), JAK-inhibitors (n=58; 75% female, mean age 53years), TNF-inhibitors (n=68; 66% female; mean age 44years;), IL17 inhibitors (n=42; 54% female; mean age 44years) and controls (n=61; 74% female, mean age 49years) were studied. Patients receiving IL6 inhibitor (81.0%), abatacept (43.8%) or rituximab (33.8%) had a significantly lower antibody response rate compared to controls (98.4%), further pronounced if combined with csDMARD (p<0.001) (Figure 1). In the adjusted logistic regression analysis, higher age, rituximab, abatacept, concomitant csDMARD but not IL6 inhibitors, concomitant prednisolone, or a vasculitis diagnosis, remained significant predictors of antibody response (Table 1). All vaccines were well tolerated. 14 (3.4%) patients reported an increased activity in their IRD following vaccination.ConclusionIn this nationwide study including IRD patients receiving b/ts DMARDs a decreased immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines was observed in patients receiving rituximab, abatacept and to some extent IL-6 inhibitors. Concomitant csDMARD gave further attenuation. Patients on rituximab and abatacept should be prioritized for booster doses of COVID19 vaccine.References[1]Jena, et al. Response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in immune mediated inflammatory diseases: Systematic rev./meta-analysis. Autoim. Rev: 2021;102927[2]Hober, et al. Systematic evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 antigens enables a highly specific and sensitive multiplex serol. C-19 assay. Clin Transl Im. 2021;10(7): e1312Table 1.Predictors of antibody response to COVID-19 vaccineRituximab-1.799<0.0010.170.07-0.42Abatacept-1.9710.0010.140.04-0.45IL6 inhibitor0.0230.9651.020.36-2.94Age (years)-0.0810.0000.920.89-0.96csDMARD-1.1270.0020.320.16-0.66Prednisolone (mg/day)-0.0640.2060.940.85-1.04Frequency (%) of individuals with good antibody response to COVID-19 vaccineAcknowledgementsUnrestricted research grants have been received från Roche and starting grants from the Swedish Rheumatism AssociationDisclosure of InterestsMartina Frodlund Consultant of: Consultancy fees from AstraZeneca and GSK, Katerina Chatzidionysiou Consultant of: Consultancy fees from Eli Lilly, AbbVie and Pfizer, Anna Södergren: None declared, Eva Klingberg: None declared, Anders Bengtsson: None declared, Lars Klareskog Grant/research support from: Research grants from Pfizer, BMS, Affibody, Sonoma Biotherapeutics, Meliha C Kapetanovic: None declared
|
|
| 10. |
- Frodlund, M., et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of immunomodulating treatment on the serological immunogenicity following three doses of covid-19 vaccine and persistence of immunogenicity of two vaccine doses in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases - a swedish study (covid19-reuma)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases. - : BMJ. - 0003-4967 .- 1468-2060. ; 82, s. 533-533
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background Data on serological immunity after three doses and the long-term immunogenicity (persistence) of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) treated with different immunomodulating drugs are still limited.Objectives To elucidate if 1) a third dose COVID-19 vaccine improves antibody responses, compared to two doses, in patients with IRD treated with biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARDs) treatment given as monotherapy or in combination with conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) compared to controls, and 2) the persistence of antibody response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine in IRD patients.Methods Antibody levels to two antigens representing Spike full length protein and Spike S1 and a Nucleocapsid C-terminal fragment (used to confirm previous COVID-19 infection) were measured in serum samples collected 2-12 and 21-40 weeks after the second vaccine dose and 2-12 weeks after the third dose using a multiplex bead-based serology assay. A sufficient antibody response (seropositivity) was defined as having antibodies over the cut-off level for both spike antigens (1). WT (wild type) anti-Spike IgG and omicron BA.1 and BA.2 variants were measured. Patients with IRD receiving immunomodulating treatment, regularly followed at a rheumatology department and a group of controls were recruited from five Swedish region.Results In total, 323 of 414 patients with IRD and 36 controls who received three vaccine doses participated in this part of the study. Following treatment groups were included: rituximab (n=118; 68% female; mean age 67 years), abatacept (n=18; 72% female; mean age 64 years), IL6r inhibitors (n=60; 73% female; mean age 64 years), JAK-inhibitors (n=44; 80% female, mean age 52 years), TNF-inhibitors (n=59; 70% female; mean age 47 years;), IL12/23/17 inhibitors (n=24; 46% female; mean age 54 years) and controls (n=36; 75% female, mean age 51 years). b/ts DMARD treatment was given as monotherapy or in combination with csDMARD, methotrexate (MTX) being the most frequently used csDMARD (32.5%). Compared to results after two vaccine doses, proportion (%) of seropositivity after three vaccine doses increased significantly in groups rituximab +/- DMARD (p=0.003 and p=0.004, respectively), IL6r inhibitors +DMARD (p=0.02), and abatacept+DMARD (p=0.01). However, the proportion of seropositivity after three vaccine doses was still significantly lower in rituximab treated patients (52%) compared to other treatment groups or controls (p<0.001) (Figure 1A/B). Antibody response to WT, omicron sBA.1 and sBA.2 showed similar pattern with the lowest levels among patients treated with rituximab.When antibody response was compared between 2-12 weeks and 21-40 weeks after second dose, the proportion of seropositive rituximab treated patients decreased from 34.9 % to 32.6%. All patients with JAK inhibitors and with JAK-inhibitors and IL6r-inhibitors seropositive 21-40 weeks after the second vaccine dose. Patients treated with other bDMARDs were not included in this analysis due to limited number participants.Conclusion In this Swedish study including IRD patients receiving different b/t DMARDs, a sufficient immunogenicity of the third dose of COVID-19 vaccine was observed in all treatments with exception for rituximab. However, the increased proportion of seropositivity after the third COVID-19 vaccine doses in rituximab and other patients with insufficient response to two doses including response to the omicron variants, supports the current recommendations on additional booster doses. The immunogenicity of two vaccine doses was preserved to 40 weeks in majority of patients treated with different immunomodulating treatment with exception for rituximab.
|
|
