| 1. |
- Caesar, Ulla, 1964, et al.
(författare)
-
Delayed and cancelled orthopaedic surgery; are there solutions to reduce the complex set of problems? A systematic literature review.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: International journal of clinical practice. - : Hindawi Limited. - 1742-1241 .- 1368-5031. ; 75:9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Unexpected cancellations of, and delays to, orthopaedic surgery have adverse effects, with a negative impact on hospital performance and undesirable patient outcomes. As cancellations and delays are common, finding measures to prevent them is a matter of urgency.The present systematic review conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook. Peer-reviewed studies reporting on cancellations or delays in patients requiring emergency orthopaedic or planned orthopaedic surgery that compared care action/intervention with no action or traditional care were included. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation used to assess the quality of evidence of the results from the included studies. The objective of the present study was systematically to search and review the literature for qualitative evidence of factors that might reduce cancellations of and delays to orthopaedic surgical procedures.The electronic search yielded 1209 studies and eight articles were included in the performed quality assessment. The heterogeneity of the studies and the lack of calculations and statistics in the studies resulted in no meta-analysis. The result of the quality assessment indicated that the evidence ranked from low to very low across the different outcomes. The main limiting factor, which was the reason for a decrease in quality in some outcomes, was the study designs, which were non-randomised control or retrospective approach. The interventions in the included studies could help to support a reduction in the risk of cancelled and delayed orthopaedic procedures.This systematic literature review has revealed important evidence to help reduce the risk of cancelled and delayed orthopaedic procedures associated with a variety of care action exposures. They include a fast-track pathway, pre-operative guidelines and telephone contact with patients prior to surgery, as well as careful consideration of additional pre-operative tests.
|
|
| 2. |
- Snaebjörnsson, Thorkell, 1982, et al.
(författare)
-
Graft Diameter and Graft Type as Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Revision: A Cohort Study Including 18,425 Patients from the Swedish and Norwegian National Knee Ligament Registries
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume. - 1535-1386. ; 101:20, s. 1812-1820
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: It is important to investigate and compare graft diameters as well as graft types to identify risk factors for revision after an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We performed the current study in order to analyze the early ACL revision rate among patients treated with hamstring tendon (HT) autografts or patellar tendon (PT) autografts of different diameters. Our hypothesis was that an increase in both HT and PT autograft diameters would reduce the risk of early ACL revision. METHODS: This retrospective study was based on prospectively collected data from the national knee ligament registries of Norway and Sweden and included patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction during the period of 2004 through 2014. The primary end point was the 2-year incidence of ACL revision. The impact of graft type and diameter on the incidence of revision surgery was reported as relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), estimated by using generalized linear models with a binomial distribution and log-link function. RESULTS: Of 58,692 patients identified, a total of 18,425 patients were included in this study. The 2-year rate of ACL revision was 2.10% (PT autografts, 2.63%; HT autografts, 2.08%; RR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.60 to 1.45]). There was an increased risk of ACL revision among patients treated with HT autografts with a diameter of <8 mm compared with larger HT autografts (RR = 1.25 [95% CI = 1.01 to 1.57]). Patients treated with HT autografts with a diameter of ≥9.0 mm or ≥10.0 mm had a reduced risk of early ACL revision compared with patients treated with PT autografts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with larger-diameter HT autografts had a lower risk of early ACL revision compared with those treated with HT autografts of <8 mm. Patients treated with HT autografts of ≥9 or ≥10 mm had a reduced risk of early ACL revision compared with patients treated with PT autografts. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
|
|
| 3. |
- Karlsson, Louise, 1993, et al.
(författare)
-
Good functional outcomes after endoscopic treatment for greater trochanteric pain syndrome
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2197-1153. ; 10:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a term covering different conditions generating lateral hip pain. Recalcitrant cases may require surgery but there are only a few studies evaluating endoscopic treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of endoscopically treated GTPS at minimum two years postoperatively using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and to assess the complication rate associated with endoscopic surgery. Methods: A total of 33 patients, mean age 43.2years, 88% women, with a mean symptom duration of 3.5years, were included in the study. A total of 36 operated hips were included. Pre- and at minimum two years postoperatively the patients completed questionnaires consisting of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) and the Hip Sports Activity scale (HSAS), the Visual analogue scale for overall hip function (VAS-OHF), the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), the EuroQoL-5 Dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D) and the EQ-VAS. Complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification. Results: Median follow-up time was 24.5months postoperatively. Statistically significant improvements were seen for the following PROMs (p < 0.05); iHOT-12 (36.3 vs 54.0), HAGOS different subscores (40.8 vs 59.0, 46.5 vs 62.6, 29.9 vs 53.1, 33.5 vs 51.4, 20.7 vs 41.4, 23.4 vs 43.3), EQ-VAS (55.9 vs 63.3) and EQ-5D (0.392 vs 0.648). VAS-OHF and HSAS did not reach significance. There was a 71% satisfaction rate with the surgery. Three Clavien-Dindo grade 1 and one grade 2 complications were registered postoperatively, with 41% of patients achieving PASS for iHOT-12 at two years follow-up. Conclusion: Endoscopic surgery for greater trochanteric pain syndrome improved patient-reported outcomes and the procedure was associated with low risk of complications. Level of evidence: Level IV.
|
|
| 4. |
- Lindman, Ida, et al.
(författare)
-
Prior hip arthroscopy does not affect 1-year patient-reported outcomes following total hip arthroplasty: a register-based matched case-control study of 675 patients
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Acta Orthopaedica. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1745-3674 .- 1745-3682. ; 92:4, s. 408-412
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose - Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a common cause of hip pain and may contribute to the development of osteoarthritis. We investigated whether a prior hip arthroscopy affects the patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) of a later total hip arthroplasty (THA). Patients and methods - Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2011 and 2018 were identified from a hip arthroscopy register and linked to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register (SHAR). A propensity-score matched control group without a prior hip arthroscopy, based on demographic data and preoperative score from the EuroQoL visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) and hip pain score, was identified from SHAR. The group with a hip arthroscopy (treated group) consisted of 135 patients and the matched control group comprised 540 patients. The included PROMs were EQ-5D and EQ VAS of the EuroQoL group, and a questionnaire regarding hip pain and another addressing satisfaction. Rate of reoperation was collected from the SHAR. The follow-up period was 1 year. Results - The mean interval from arthroscopy to THA was 27 months (SD 19). The EQ-5D was 0.81 and 0.82, and EQ VAS was 78 and 79 in the treated group and the matched control group respectively. There were no differences in hip pain, and reported satisfaction was similar with 87% in the treated group and 86% in the matched control group. Interpretation - These results offer reassurance that a prior hip arthroscopy for FAIS does not appear to affect the short-term patient-reported outcomes of a future THA and indicate that patients undergoing an intervention are not at risk of inferior results due to their prior hip arthroscopy.
|
|
| 5. |
- Lindman, Ida, et al.
(författare)
-
Self-Reported Level of Sports Compared With Objective Data in Athletes With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome
- 2024
-
Ingår i: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE. - 0363-5465 .- 1552-3365.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is common among ice hockey and soccer players. To evaluate the prevalence of return to sports after hip arthroscopy or level of sports before surgery, self-reported questionnaires such as the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) are frequently used. There is a risk of self-reporting bias when using these tools.Purpose: To evaluate how self-reported levels of sports using HSAS correspond to objective data.Study Design: Cohort study, Level of evidence: 3.Method: Ice hockey and soccer players undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS between 2011 and 2019 and included in the local hip arthroscopy registry in Gothenburg, Sweden, aged >= 18 years at the time of surgery, with a self-reported HSAS level of 7 or 8 before onset of symptoms, were included. Objective data on level of sports were collected through sports-specific sources (https://football.instatscout.com, https://hockey.instatscout.com, https://www.eliteprospects.com, and Swedish Football Association). Objective data were collected for the corresponding season when the athletes reported their symptom onset. Agreement between subjective and objective data was described using descriptive statistics, and comparison between subgroups was made.Results: A total of 483 athletes met the inclusion criteria: 80 ice hockey and 403 soccer players. The majority were men (90%). The mean age was 26.5 years (SD, 8.3 years). When comparing HSAS level with objective data, 112 athletes (23%) had a correct self-reported HSAS level. Of 251 athletes with a self-reported HSAS level of 8, 76 (30%) had a matching objective HSAS level, and 36 of 232 (16%) athletes with a self-reported HSAS level of 7 had a matching objective HSAS level. Of the erroneous subjective ratings, 98% were higher than the objective data. Athletes reporting a correct HSAS level were younger (24.6 vs 26.4 years; P = .04) and had a shorter symptom duration (18 vs 24 months; P < .001). Ice hockey players scored themselves correctly more often than soccer players (P < .001).Conclusion: Only 23% of athletes undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS self-reported an HSAS level before onset of symptoms that was accurate according to the objectively recorded data. The majority self-reported an HSAS level above their correct level of sports. Ice hockey players, younger age, and shorter symptom duration were associated with correct self-assessment.
|
|
| 6. |
- Öhlin, Axel, 1990, et al.
(författare)
-
Quality Assessment of Prospective Cohort Studies Evaluating Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. - : SAGE Publications. - 2325-9671. ; 7:5
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome is a cause of pain and reduced range of motion in the hip joint. Given the limited number of randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies constitute the dominant part of the available prospective evidence evaluating relevant clinical outcomes after arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI. Purpose: To assess the methodological quality of prospective cohort studies evaluating arthroscopic surgery for FAI and to determine whether there has been an improvement in methodological quality over time. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase (OvidSP), and the Cochrane Library. Included studies were clinical prospective cohort studies of primary arthroscopic surgery for cam and/or pincer morphology FAI. Methodological quality was assessed with the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS). The mean MINORS score for studies published during the first 5 years of the period was compared with those published during the last 5 years to evaluate methodological improvement over time. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials was also assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score. Results: The search yielded 53 studies. There were 34 noncomparative studies, 15 nonrandomized comparative studies, and 4 randomized controlled trials. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2017. The mean +/- SD MINORS score for noncomparative and comparative studies was 10.4 +/- 1.4 of 16 possible and 18.7 +/- 2.0 of 24 possible, respectively. The mean Coleman Methodology Score for randomized controlled trials was 79.0 +/- 7.0 of 100 possible. Conclusion: The methodological quality of prospective cohort studies evaluating arthroscopic surgery for FAI is moderate for comparative and noncomparative studies. Common areas for improvement include unbiased assessment of study endpoints and prospective sample-size calculations. Despite an increase in the number of published studies, an improvement in methodological quality over time was not observed.
|
|
