| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, PLI, et al.
(författare)
-
Triweekly docetaxel versus biweekly docetaxel as a treatment for advanced castration resistant prostate cancer: Quality of life analysis
- 2014
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 32:4
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- 23 Background: Bi-weekly docetaxel (T) with prednisone improved progression free survival and overall survival when compared with the standard tri-weekly T as first-line treatment for advanced castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) (Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:117-124). We report here the quality of life (QoL) results of this prospective randomized trial. Methods: Three hundred and forty-six patients were randomly allocated centrally to receive intravenous therapy T of either 75 mg/m² d1 q3 wks (the triweekly arm) or 50 mg/m² d1 and d 14, q4 wks (the biweekly arm) (identifier NCT00255606). Prednisone (10 mg/d) was administered orally in both groups. The baseline patients characteristics were well balanced between the groups with respect to the performance status, mean age (69, range 45 to 87 vs. 68, range 46 to 85), and median serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) content (109 µg/L, range 11 to 1,230 vs. 116 µg/L, range 12 to 1,870). Quality of life (QoL), the frequency and severity of symptoms including pain were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) version 4.0 questionnaire. Results: The baseline (QoL) of both treatment groups was compared to QoL after six months of the treatment within each treatment group and between groups. Changes in fatigue, symptoms of pain and nausea, and the overall performance status did not differ between the groups. There were statistically significant differences in overall quality of life values (p=0.010) and discomforting pain values (p=0.028) favoring the bi-weekly treatment arm. Conclusions: Bi-weekly T is better tolerated than the tri-weekly standard T. Following the results from the clinical outcome and the QoL outcome in the PROSTY trial we would recommend the use of bi-weekly docetaxel as first line treatment of CRPC Clinical trial information: NCT00255606.
|
|
| 6. |
- Wilking, N., et al.
(författare)
-
Long-term follow-up of the SBG 9401 study comparing tailored FEC-based therapy versus marrow-supported high-dose therapy
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Annals of Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0923-7534 .- 1569-8041. ; 18:4, s. 694-700
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The purpose was to investigate adjuvant marrow-supportive high-dose chemotherapy compared with an equitoxicity-tailored comparator arm. Patients and methods: Five hundred and twenty-five women below theage of 60 years with operated high-risk primary breast cancer were randomised to nine cycles of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor supported and individually tailored FEC (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide), (n = 251) or standard FEC followed by marrow-supported high-dose therapy with CTCb (cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, carboplatin) therapy (n = 274), followed by locoregional radiotherapy and tamoxifen for 5 years. Results: There were 104 breast cancer relapses in the tailored FEC group versus 139 in the CTCb group (double triangular method by Whitehead, P = 0.046), with a median follow-up of all included patients of 60.8 months. The event-free survival demonstrated 121 and 150 events in the tailored FEC- and CTCb group, respectively [P = 0.074, hazard ratio (HR) 0.804, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-1.022]. Ten patients in the tailored FEC regimen developed acute myeloid leukaemia (AML)/myelodysplasia (MDS). One hundred deaths occurred in the tailored FEC group and 121 in the CTCb group (P = 0.287, HR 0.866, 95% CI 0.665-1.129). Conclusion: The update of this study shows an improved outcome linked to the tailored FEC treatment in relation to breast cancer relapse, but also an increased incidence of AML/MDS. © 2007 Oxford University Press.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
