| 1. |
- Bjorndal, Lars, et al.
(author)
-
Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy
- 2010
-
In: European Journal of Oral Sciences. - : Wiley. - 0909-8836 .- 1600-0722. ; 118:3, s. 290-297
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Less invasive excavation methods have been suggested for deep caries lesions. We tested the effects of stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, 1 yr after the procedure had been carried out, in 314 adults (from six centres) who had received treatment of a tooth with deep caries. The teeth had caries lesions involving 75% or more of the dentin and were centrally randomized to stepwise or direct complete excavation. Stepwise excavation resulted in fewer pulp exposures compared with direct complete excavation [difference: 11.4%, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.2; 21.3)]. At 1 yr of follow-up, there was a statistically significantly higher success rate with stepwise excavation, with success being defined as an unexposed pulp with sustained pulp vitality without apical radiolucency [difference: 11.7%, 95% CI (0.5; 22.5)]. In a subsequent nested trial, 58 patients with exposed pulps were randomized to direct capping or partial pulpotomy. We found no significant difference in pulp vitality without apical radiolucency between the two capping procedures after more than 1 yr [31.8% and 34.5%; difference: 2.7%, 95% CI (−22.7; 26.6)]. In conclusion, stepwise excavation decreases the risk of pulp exposure compared with direct complete excavation. In view of the poor prognosis of vital pulp treatment, a stepwise excavation approach for managing deep caries lesions is recommended.
|
|
| 2. |
- Bjørndal, Lars, et al.
(author)
-
Randomised clinical trial on deep caries excavation 3-5 yr follow-up
- 2012
-
In: Journal of dental research. - : Sage Publications. ; 91:Spec Iss b
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- Objectives: Long term follow-up data based on randomised clinical trials are needed in relation to deep caries treatment. The aim of the present trial is to investigate the beneficial and harmful long term effects of stepwise excavation during two visits versus one completed excavation of deep caries in permanent teeth in adults. Methods: Consecutive patients contacting clinical units in Sweden and Denmark were included. The trial is a centrally randomised patient- and observer-blinded multicenter trial, with two parallel intervention groups. A sample size calculation showed that 134 patients were needed in each group. Taking dropouts into account, a total of 314 patients fulfilled well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria and were centrally block-randomised stratified by age and pain. Inclusion criteria: (i) Person ≥ 18 yrs having deep caries with or without pain (ii) x-ray showing primary caries into the inner 1/4 of the dentin, with the presence of a radiopaque zone at the pulpal wall. Success was defined as unexposed pulp with sustained pulp vitality without apical radiolucency after follow-up. Blinded evaluation of 1½ follow-up has previously been carried out in 106 patients (stepwise excavation group) and 93 patients (direct complete excavation) (Bjørndal et al. 2010, EJOS). Results: At 3-5 yr follow up there was a statistically significantly higher success with stepwise excavation [difference: 11.5%, 95% confidence interval (0.5; 22.2)] versus a direct complete excavation procedure, being similarly with the short term follow-up data. 53.3% (n = 102) of the material has been controlled and no significant differences were noted between the two intervention groups in terms of patients not yet controlled, lost patients and failures (Table). Conclusion: A stepwise excavation procedure still seems preferable after a long term follow up and presumably related to the reduced risk of exposing the inflamed pulp associated with deep caries.
|
|
| 3. |
- Bjørndal, Lars, et al.
(author)
-
Randomized Clinical Trials on Deep Carious Lesions : 5-Year Follow-up
- 2017
-
In: Journal of Dental Research. - : Sage Publications. - 0022-0345 .- 1544-0591. ; 96:7, s. 747-753
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Deep caries presents a dilemma in terms of which treatment that will render an optimal prognosis by maintaining pulp vitality with absence of apical pathology. Previously, 2 randomized clinical trials were performed testing the short-term effects of stepwise carious tissue removal versus nonselective carious removal to hard dentin with or without pulp exposure. The aim of this article was to report the 5-y outcome on these previously treated patients having radiographically well-defined carious lesions extending into the pulpal quarter of the dentin but with a well-defined radiodense zone between the carious lesion and the pulp. In this long-term study, 239 of 314 (76.2%) patients were analyzed. The stepwise removal group had a significantly higher proportion of success (60.2%) at 5-y follow-up compared with the nonselective carious removal to hard dentin group (46.3%) ( P = 0.031) when pulp exposures per se were included as failures. Pulp exposure rate was significantly lower in the stepwise carious removal group (21.2% vs. 35.5%; P = 0.014). Irrespective of pulp exposure status, the difference (13.3%) was still significant when sustained pulp vitality without apical radiolucency and unbearable pain was considered (95% confidence interval, 3.1-26.3, P = 0.045). After pulp exposure, only 9% ( n = 4) of the analyzed patients were assessed as successful, indicating that the prognosis is highly dubious following conventional pulp-capping procedures (direct pulp capping or partial pulpotomy) in deep carious lesions in adults. In conclusion, the stepwise carious removal group had a significantly higher proportion of pulps with sustained vitality without apical radiolucency versus nonselective carious removal of deep carious lesions in adult teeth at 5-y follow-up (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00187837 and NCT00187850).
|
|
