| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Bylund, Linus, 1980, et al.
(författare)
-
The Who? Didactics, differentiation and the biopolitics of inequality
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Utbildning och Demokrati. - : Orebro University. - 1102-6472. ; 29:3, s. 89-108
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The three didactic questions – what?, how? and why? – are increasingly supplemented with a fourth: who? Drawing on Therborn’s distinction between difference and inequality, as well as on biopolitical theory, the present paper engages critically with the didactic who?-question. The paper situates the who?-question in broader discussions of educational differentiation, suggesting that it encompasses a tension between the recognition of difference and (re)production of inequality. Arguably, this tension becomes visible, and possibly more navigable, when we pose “Therbornian questions”. The paper further suggests that the who?-question can be understood, in biopolitical terms, as a technique for constructing various student populations as appropriate for different kinds of education. Such management of difference, the paper warns, can easily slip into a biopolitics of inequality. Despite our critical observations, we conclude that there might still be radical potential in the who?-question, provided that it is handed over to the students and that careful attention is paid to societal relations.
|
|
| 6. |
- Bylund, Linus, 1980, et al.
(författare)
-
‘We must urgently learn to live differently’: the biopolitics of ESD for 2030
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Environmental Education Research. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1350-4622 .- 1469-5871. ; 28:1, s. 40-55
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recently, the new global policy framework for implementing education for sustainable development (ESD) – ESD for 2030 – was launched officially. Drawing on Foucauldian theory, this paper explores biopolitical elements in ESD for 2030. The paper contributes to previous research on ESD policy by employing a biopolitical perspective, and by highlighting problematic aspects of the framework’s will to include and to adapt to different contexts. The analysis brings attention to the framework’s notions of life and to how different human populations are separated. Furthermore, the analysis of the framework demonstrates how notions of transformative pedagogy, community, and the individual, assume the functions of biopolitical techniques. The findings point to a biopolitical differentiation where rich and poor populations are assumed to need different educational interventions, adapted to their socio-economic contexts, in the global educational policy quest for sustainable development. Ultimately, we consider the potential of Foucauldian ethics as an affirmative alternative to the current mode of biopolitical differentiation in global ESD policy
|
|
| 7. |
- Follér, Maj-Lis, 1946, et al.
(författare)
-
Who is responsible? : Donor-civil society partnerships and the case of hiv/aids work
- 2013
-
Rapport (refereegranskat)abstract
- Civil society organisations are today considered crucial indevelopment partnerships. This Policy Dialogue argues that current aid programs tend to turn such CSOs into businesses that are required to meet donor demands for reportable results, rather than to serve the needs of intended beneficiaries. Based on case studies drawn from HIV and AIDS work in Mozambique, Rwanda and South Africa, the report explores the methods donors use to govern development partnerships and their effect on the distribution of responsibility among partners. It further examines the responses by recipient organisations to these requirements, ranging from acquiescence to resistance. These case studies, drawn from the field of HIV/AIDS, are also invaluable in shedding light on wider issue of the governance of international development cooperation with civil society.
|
|
| 8. |
- Hellberg, Sofie, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Don efter population? Utbildning för hållbar utveckling och det globala biopolitiska GAPet
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige. - 1401-6788. ; 23:3-4, s. 172-191
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Världen över implementeras just nu det globala handlingsprogrammet för utbildning för hållbar utveckling (GAP). Ett återkommande budskap är att programmet förenar mänskligheten i en gemensam strävan mot ett bättre, jämlikare och ”grönare” liv för alla. Men är det verkligen så? Föreliggande artikel driver tesen att mänskligheten snarare delas upp. Med utgångspunkt i biopolitisk teoribildning sätter artikeln således fokus på differentiering och på vilka typer av kunskap(er) och livsstilsanspråk som olika populationer erbjuds i den hållbara utvecklingens namn. Ytterst är frågan om utbildning för hållbar utveckling riskerar att reproducera det globala gap som skiljer rika och fattiga människors livsstilar åt. Artikeln, som främst utgör ett teoretiskt och metodologiskt bidrag till den nordiska miljö- och hållbarhetsutbildningsforskningen, argumenterar för globala utblickar och biopolitiskt informerade undersökningar av hur GAP implementeras visavi olika populationer i olika sammanhang. Vidare diskuteras de metodologiska konsekvenserna av det biopolitiska perspektivet, d.v.s. vilka typer av frågor som blir relevanta att ställa och hur dessa kan beforskas.
|
|
| 9. |
- Hellberg, Sofie, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Governmentalities of automobility in times of climate change: competing logics of circulation and imaginaries of the (im)possible
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Mobilities. - : Taylor & Francis. - 1745-0101 .- 1745-011X.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- If we are to achieve climate change targets, transport systems need to transform. This article is concerned with the prospects of challenging the regime of automobility in urban areas. It employs a governmentality framework, alongside theories of automobility, in order to analyse mobility governmentalities in Gothenburg, Sweden. Gothenburg is an interesting case in the context of reducing car use given its identity as a ‘car city.’ Despite this, Gothenburg has high ambitions in terms of reducing car traffic. Reaching these goals are however associated with challenges: prognoses predict a continued increase in car traffic, and political acceptance is viewed as an obstacle. The article’s findings are based on semi-structured interviews with public officials and stakeholders, zooming in on (1) conflicting spatialities and temporalities (2) competing logics of circulation and pace and (3) mobility imaginaries of the (im)possible. We argue that while there are new logics entering urban mobility governmentalities as an effect of the climate transition, their possibilities to affect material change are confined because the movement and circulation of ‘people and things,’ ultimately represented by the private car, are closely tied to the way that freedom is exercised, understood and manifested in contemporary liberal societies.
|
|
| 10. |
- Hellberg, Sofie, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
Minskad biltrafik – en förutsättning för stadens klimatomställning
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Fem perspektiv på stadens omställning.
-
Bokkapitel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Dagens förhållningssätt till bilen som transportmedel och rädsla för medborgarnas missnöje gör det svårt att minska biltrafiken i staden. Det visar vår studie av Göteborgs Stad, där omställningen i praktiken går långsamt trots ambitiösa mål. För att nå klimatmålen krävs åtgärder som vågar omordna hierarkier i stadens transportsystem.
|
|
