| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Fassnacht, Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
Combination chemotherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma
- 2012
-
Ingår i: New England Journal of Medicine. - 0028-4793 .- 1533-4406. ; 366:23, s. 2189-2197
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND:Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare cancer that has a poor response to cytotoxic treatment.METHODS:We randomly assigned 304 patients with advanced adrenocortical carcinoma to receive mitotane plus either a combination of etoposide (100 mg per square meter of body-surface area on days 2 to 4), doxorubicin (40 mg per square meter on day 1), and cisplatin (40 mg per square meter on days 3 and 4) (EDP) every 4 weeks or streptozocin (streptozotocin) (1 g on days 1 to 5 in cycle 1; 2 g on day 1 in subsequent cycles) every 3 weeks. Patients with disease progression received the alternative regimen as second-line therapy. The primary end point was overall survival.RESULTS:For first-line therapy, patients in the EDP-mitotane group had a significantly higher response rate than those in the streptozocin-mitotane group (23.2% vs. 9.2%, P<0.001) and longer median progression-free survival (5.0 months vs. 2.1 months; hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 0.69; P<0.001); there was no significant between-group difference in overall survival (14.8 months and 12.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.02; P=0.07). Among the 185 patients who received the alternative regimen as second-line therapy, the median duration of progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the EDP-mitotane group and 2.2 months in the streptozocin-mitotane group. Patients who did not receive the alternative second-line therapy had better overall survival with first-line EDP plus mitotane (17.1 month) than with streptozocin plus mitotane (4.7 months). Rates of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between treatments.CONCLUSIONS:Rates of response and progression-free survival were significantly better with EDP plus mitotane than with streptozocin plus mitotane as first-line therapy, with similar rates of toxic events, although there was no significant difference in overall survival.
|
|
| 3. |
- Kerkhofs, Tm, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparison of Two Mitotane Starting dose Regimens in Patients with Advanced Adrenocortical Carcinoma
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. - : The Endocrine Society. - 0021-972X .- 1945-7197. ; 98:12, s. 2281-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context:Mitotane is the only approved drug for treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma(ACC). Its pharmacokinetic properties are not fully elucidated and different dosing regimens have never been compared head-to-head.Objective:To investigate the relationship between mitotane dose and plasma concentration comparing two dosing regimens.Design/Setting:Prospective open-label multicenter trial of a predefined duration of twelve weeks.Patients/Interventions:Forty mitotane-naïve patients with metastatic ACC were assigned to a predefined low- or high-dose regimen by the local investigator. Thirty-two could be evaluated in detail.Main Outcome Measure:Difference in median mitotane plasma levels between both treatment groups.Results:Despite a difference in mean cumulative dose (440±142g versus 272±121g), median maximum plasma levels were not significantly different between the two groups (high-dose 14.3mg/L (6.3-29.7,n=20) versus 11.3mg/L (5.5-20.0,n=12), p=0.235). Ten out of twenty patients on the high-dose regimen reached plasma concentrations ≥14mg/L after 46 days (18-81 days) compared to four of twelve patients on the low-dose regimen after 55 days (46-74 days,p=0.286). All patients who reached 14mg/L at 12 weeks displayed a level ≥4.1 mg/L on day 33 (100% sensitivity). There were no significant differences in frequency and severity of adverse events. Among patients not receiving concomitant chemotherapy mitotane exposure was higher in the high-dose group: 1013±494mg.d/L versus 555±168mg.d/L, p=0.080.Conclusions:The high-dose starting regimen did neither result in significantly different mitotane levels nor in a different rate of adverse events, but concomitant chemotherapy influenced these results. Thus, for mitotane monotherapy the high-dose approach is favorable, whereas for combination therapy a lower dose seems reasonable.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
