| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Norlund, L, et al.
(författare)
-
Reference intervals for the glomerular filtration rate and cell-proliferation markers : serum cystatin C and serum beta 2-microglobulin/cystatin C-ratio
- 1997
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0036-5513 .- 1502-7686. ; 57:6, s. 463-470
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Recent studies have indicated that serum and plasma cystatin C are better markers for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than serum creatinine, ubiquitously used for this purpose. To fully exploit the value of serum and plasma cystatin C as GFR markers, reliable age and sex-correlated reference intervals are required. The present study comprised cystatin C determinations in plasma and sera from 259 individuals from a well-defined area in the southernmost part of Sweden. From demographic lists two men and two women were randomly selected from each one-year birth cohort above 20 years of age. No sex differences were found for plasma and serum cystatin C, whereas an increase in the cystatin C levels with age was noted, corresponding to the known age-related decrease in GFR. The following reference intervals are recommended for practical clinical use: S-Cystatin C (both sexes): 20-50 years, 0.70-1.21 mg l-1 and 50+ years, 0.84-1.55 mg l-1. The same samples were also used for determination of beta 2-microglobulin levels in order to calculate reference intervals for the beta 2-microglobulin/cystatin C-ratio, which is a more distinct marker for cell proliferation, particularly lymphoproliferation, than is the serum level of beta 2-microglobulin alone, since the ratio should be virtually uninfluenced by GFR. The beta 2-microglobulin/cystatin C-ratios were uninfluenced by sex and age and 1.45-2.43 is recommended as the serum reference interval for practical clinical use. Serum creatinine was determined in the same samples and the creatinine level was found to be strongly influenced by sex and weakly by age.
|
|
| 3. |
- Sundström, Johan, Professor, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
A registry-based randomised trial comparing an SGLT2 inhibitor and metformin as standard treatment of early stage type 2 diabetes (SMARTEST): Rationale, design and protocol
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications. - : Elsevier BV. - 1056-8727 .- 1873-460X. ; 35:10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce cardiovascular and renal complications in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients at high cardiovascular risk. Metformin is currently widely used as initial monotherapy in T2D but lacks convincing data to show that it reduces risk of complications. We aim to compare the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin and metformin as first-line T2D medication with regard to development of complications in a registry-based randomised controlled trial. Methods: The SGLT2 inhibitor or metformin as standard treatment of early stage type 2 diabetes (SMARTEST) trial will enrol 4300 subjects at 30-40 study sites in Sweden who will be randomised 1:1 to either metformin or dapagliflozin. Participants must have T2D duration <4 years, no prior cardiovascular disease, and be either drug-naive or on monotherapy for T2D. Results: The primary endpoint is a composite of all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events and occurrence or progression of microvascular complications (retinopathy, nephropathy, diabetic foot lesions). Secondary endpoints include individual components of the primary endpoint, start of insulin therapy, risk factor biomarkers, patient-reported outcome measures, and cost-effectiveness analysis. Outcomes will primarily be assessed using nationwide healthcare registries. Conclusions: The SMARTEST trial will investigate whether dapagliflozin is superior to metformin in preventing complications in early stage T2D. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03982381, EudraCT 2019-001046-17).
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Willers, C., et al.
(författare)
-
Sociodemographic determinants and health outcome variation in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A register-based study
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Plos One. - : Public Library of Science (PLoS). - 1932-6203. ; 13:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Socioeconomic status, origin or demographic attributes shall not determine the quality of healthcare delivery, according to e.g. United Nations and European Union rules. Health equity has been defined as the absence of systematic disparities and unwarranted differences between groups defined by differences in social advantages. A study was performed to investigate whether this was applicable to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1D) care in a setting with universal, tax-funded healthcare. Methods This retrospective registry-study was based on patient-level data from individuals diagnosed with T1D during 2010-2011 (n = 16,367) in any of seven Swedish county councils (covering -65% of the Swedish population). Health equity in T1D care was analysed through multivariate regression analyses on absolute HbA1c level at one-year follow-up, one-year change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and one-year change in cardiovascular risk score, using selected sociodemographic dimensions as case-mix factors. Results Higher educational level was consistently associated with lower levels of HbA1c, and so was being married. Never married was associated with worse eGFR development, and lower educational level was associated with higher cardiovascular risk. Women had higher HbA1c levels than men, and glucose control was significantly worse in patients below the age of 25. Conclusion Patients' sociodemographic profile was strongly associated with absolute levels of risk factor control in T1 D, but also with an increased annual deterioration in eGFR. Whether these systematic differences stem from patient-related problems or healthcare organisational shortcomings is a matter for further research. The results, though, highlight the need for intensified diabetes management education and secondary prevention directed towards T1D patients, taking sociodemographic characteristics into account.
|
|
