| 1. |
- Beckwée, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Exercise therapy for knee osteoarthritis pain: how does it work? A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - 2044-6055. ; 14:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Muscle strengthening training (MST) and behavioural graded activity (BGA) show comparable effects on knee osteoarthritic (KOA) pain, but the mechanisms of action remain unclear. Both exercise-induced anti-inflammation and central sensitisation are promising pathways for pain relief in response to exercise therapy in patients with KOA: MST has the potential to decrease inflammation and BGA has the potential to decrease central sensitisation. Hence, this study aims to examine inflammation and central sensitisation as mediators for the effect of MST and/or BGA on pain in patients with KOA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Knee OsteoArthritis PAIN trial started on 10 January 2020 (anticipated end: April 2024). The three-arm clinical trial aims to recruit 90 KOA patients who will be randomly allocated to 12 weeks of (1) MST, (2) BGA or (3) care as usual. Assessments will be performed at baseline, 13 and 52 weeks after finishing the intervention. Outcomes, including pain (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score), were chosen in line with the OARSI recommendations for clinical trials of rehabilitation interventions for OA and the IMMPACT/OMERACT recommendations for the assessment of physical function in chronic pain clinical trials. Inflammation as well as features of central sensitisation (including conditioned pain modulation, offset analgesia, temporal summation of pain and event-related potentials following electrical stimulation), will be considered as treatment mediators. A multiple mediators model will be estimated with a path-analysis using structural equation models. In July 2023, all 90 KOA patients have been included and 42 participants already finished the study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study obtained ethics approval (B.U.N. 143201941843). Unravelling the mechanisms of action of exercise therapy in KOA will not only be extremely valuable for researchers, but also for exercise immunology and pain scientists and clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04362618.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Nijs, Jo, et al.
(författare)
-
Central sensitisation in chronic pain conditions : latest discoveries and their potential for precision medicine
- 2021
-
Ingår i: The Lancet Rheumatology. - : Elsevier. - 2665-9913. ; 3:5, s. E383-E392
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Chronic pain is a leading cause of disability globally and associated with enormous health-care costs. The discrepancy between the extent of tissue damage and the magnitude of pain, disability, and associated symptoms represents a diagnostic challenge for rheumatology specialists. Central sensitisation, defined as an amplification of neural signalling within the CNS that elicits pain hypersensitivity, has been investigated as a reason for this discrepancy. Features of central sensitisation have been documented in various pain conditions common in rheumatology practice, including fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, upper extremity tendinopathies, headache, and spinal pain. Within individual pain conditions, there is substantial variation among patients in terms of presence and magnitude of central sensitisation, stressing the importance of individual assessment. Central sensitisation predicts poor treatment outcomes in multiple patient populations. The available evidence supports various pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies to reduce central sensitisation and to improve patient outcomes in several conditions commonly seen in rheumatology practice. These data open up new treatment perspectives, with the possibility for precision pain medicine treatment according to pain phenotyping as a logical next step. With this view, studies suggest the possibility of matching non-pharmacological approaches, or medications, or both to the central sensitisation pain
|
|
| 4. |
- Puts, Sofie, et al.
(författare)
-
Exercise-induced effects on inflammatory markers and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in patients with knee osteoarthritis. A systematic review with meta-analysis
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Exercise immunology review. - 1077-5552. ; 29, s. 22-53
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In the pathogenesis of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), inflammatory mediators play an important role. However, the precise underlying mechanism by which regular exercise therapy (ET) exert effects on the immune system in KOA patients is unknown. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the basal and acute effects of ET on inflammatory biomarkers and brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in KOA patients. Methods: PubMed, Web Of Science and PEDro were systematically searched for appropriate studies. If possible, a meta-analysis was performed or an approximation of the effect size (ES) was calculated. Risk of bias was scored using the Cochrane ROB 2.0 or ROBINS-tools. Results: Twenty-one studies involving 1374 participants were included. Fifteen articles focused on basal exercise effects, four on acute effects, and two on both. Biomarker analysis (n=18) was performed in synovial fluid (n=4) or serum/plasma (n=17). A meta-analysis demonstrated that basal CRP was reduced in KOA patients 6-18 weeks weeks after ET (MD: -0.17;95%CI[-0.31;-0.03]), while IL-6 (MD: 0.21;95%CI[-0.44;0.85]), and TNF-α (MD: -0.57;95%CI[-1.47;0.32]), levels did not significantly change. Also, sTNFR1/2 did not change significantly after ET. For other biomarkers, insufficient data were available to perform a meta-analysis. Nevertheless, a low degree of evidence was found for a decrease in IL-6 (ES:-0.596 & -0.259 & -0.513), an increase in sTNFR1 (ES:2.325), a decrease in sTNFR2 (ES:-0.997) and an increase in BDNF (ES:1.412). Locally, intra-articular IL-10 (ES:9.163) increased, and IL1β (ES:-6.199) and TNF-α decreased (ES:-2.322) after ET. An acute exercise session elicited a myokine response (ES IL-6:0.314), and an increase in BDNF (no ES-data). No inflammatory effect (ES CRP:0.052; ES TNF-α:-0.019 & 0.081) following an acute bout of training was found. However, a single bout of exercise elicited a decrease in intra-articular IL-10 (no ES-data). Conclusion: ET can induce circulatory and intra-articular anti-inflammatory effects in patients with KOA. The antiinflammatory properties have important implications for informing these patients and clinicians about the underlying effects of ET.
|
|
| 5. |
- Roose, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of perceived injustice-targeted pain neuroscience education compared with biomedically focused education in breast cancer survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (BCS-PI trial)
- 2024
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - 2044-6055. ; 14:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- INTRODUCTION: Current treatments for pain in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) are mostly biomedically focused rather than biopsychosocially driven. However, 22% of BCSs with pain are experiencing perceived injustice, which is a known predictor for adverse pain outcomes and opioid prescription due to increased maladaptive pain behaviour. Educational interventions such as pain neuroscience education (PNE) are suggested to target perceived injustice. In addition, motivational interviewing can be an effective behavioural change technique. This trial aims to examine whether perceived injustice-targeted PNE with the integration of motivational interviewing is superior to biomedically focused pain education in reducing pain after 12 months in BCS with perceived injustice and pain. In addition, improvements in quality of life, perceived injustice and opioid use are evaluated, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will finally result in a recommendation concerning the use of perceived injustice-targeted PNE in BCSs with perceived injustice and pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial will recruit female BCS (n=156) with pain and perceived injustice. Participants will be randomly assigned to perceived injustice-targeted PNE or biomedically focused pain education in each centre. Both interventions include an online session, an information leaflet and three one-to-one sessions. The primary outcome (pain), secondary outcomes (quality of life, perceived injustice and outcomes for cost-effectiveness analysis) and explanatory outcomes (pain phenotyping, sleep, fatigue and cognitive-emotional factors) will be assessed at baseline and at 0, 6, 12 and 24months postintervention using self-reported questionnaires online. Treatment effects over time will be evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. Additionally, a cost-utility analysis will be done from a healthcare payer and societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The ethical agreement was obtained from the Main Ethics Committee (B.U.N.1432020000068) at the University Hospital Brussels and all other participating hospitals. Study results will be disseminated through presentations, conferences, social media, press and journals.
|
|
| 6. |
- Roose, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Perceived Injustice in Cancer Survivors: Population-Specific Cut-Off Score and Relations with Personal Factors, Symptoms and Quality of Life-A Cross-Sectional Study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - 2077-0383. ; 12:18
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Fatigue and pain are the most common side effects impacting quality of life (QoL) in cancer survivors. Recent insights have shown that perceived injustice (PI) can play a substantial role in these side effects, but research on cancer survivors is scarce. Furthermore, guidelines for recognizing clinically relevant levels of PI in cancer survivors are missing. The aims of this study are to provide a clinically relevant cut-off for PI and to explore relationships between personal characteristics, symptoms, and QoL with PI. This multicenter, cross-sectional study uses the Injustice Experience Questionnaire (IEQ), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Patient-Specific Complaints (PSC), Multidimensional Fatigue Index (MFI), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30). A clinical cut-off for PI was identified based on the 75th percentile of IEQ scores. Univariate and multivariate regressions explored the relationship between PI and personal characteristics (sex, age, cancer type, treatment type), symptoms (pain intensity, fatigue), and QoL (daily activity complaints, cancer-related QoL). Cancer survivors (n = 121) were included, and a cut-off of 20 was identified. Significant indirect associations were found between chemotherapy, NPRS, PSC, MFI, and EORTC-QLQ-C30 with PI. In the multivariate model, only MFI (B = 0.205; 95% CI: 0.125-0.018) and age (B = 0.086; 95% CI: -0.191-0.285) maintained a significant association with PI.
|
|
