| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Liapis, C. D., et al.
(författare)
-
ESVS guidelines : Invasive treatment for carotid stenosis: indications, techniques
- 2009
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 37:4, Suppl 1, s. S1-S19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The European Society for Vascular Surgery brought together a group of experts in the field of carotid artery disease to produce updated guidelines for the invasive treatment of carotid disease. The recommendations were rated according to the level of evidence. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is recommended in symptomatic patients with >50% stenosis if the perioperative stroke/death rate is <6% [A], preferably within 2 weeks of the patient's last symptoms [A]. CEA is also recommended in asymptomatic men <75 years old with 70-99% stenosis if the perioperative stroke/death risk is <3% [A]. The benefit from CEA in asymptomatic women is significantly less than in men [A]. CEA should therefore be considered only in younger, fit women [A]. Carotid patch angioplasty is preferable to primary closure [A]. Aspirin at a dose of 75-325 mg daily and statins should be given before, during and following CEA. [A] Carotid artery stenting (CAS) should be performed only in high-risk for CEA patients, in high-volume centres with documented low peri-operative stroke and death rates or inside a randomized controlled trial [C]. CAS should be performed under dual antiplatelet treatment with aspirin and clopidogrel [A]. Carotid protection devices are probably of benefit [C].
|
|
| 5. |
- Liapis, C. D., et al.
(författare)
-
European continuing medical education in vascular surgery : 5-year results of congresses approved by the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes Section of Vascular Surgery
- 2007
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Angiology. - 0392-9590 .- 1827-1839. ; 26:4, s. 361-366
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: Continuing medical education (CME) can be defined as ''educational activities that serve to maintain, develop, or increase the knowledge, skills and professional performance of a physician to provide services for patients, the public, or the profession''. CME is a major professional responsibility. The European Board of Vascular Surgery of the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes (UEMS) Section of Vascular Surgery has, through its European Vascular CME (EVCME) Committee, accredited 74 congresses during the 5-year period from 2000-2004. METHODS: Official evaluation forms were completed by the congress participants for a personal appraisal of the quality of the activities. The data in this manuscript focused on questions that were the most relevant and of the greatest interest to the participants. A statistical analysis of the results was performed utilizing ANOVA and Robust tests of equality of means as well as a posthoc analysis for further investigation, and non parametric Wilcoxon signed ranks test. RESULTS: The educational needs of participants regarding new diagnostic and therapeutic modes were stated as ''important'' and ''extremely important'' in the responses at over 80% in total. Over 75% of the participants answered ''extremely important'' and ''important'' to the question ''how important is evidence-based practice to your practice''. CONCLUSION: This survey indicates that the EVCME approved congresses had a positive impact for the vascular surgeon by updating overall knowledge on vascular surgery; the majority of comments by the participants also indicates that EVCME is fulfilling its aim to bring as much evidence-based practice as possible into the daily work schedule of the surgeon by turning knowledge acquired by CME into performance of the participants.
|
|
| 6. |
- Liapis, C. D., et al.
(författare)
-
Vascular training and endovascular practice in Europe
- 2009
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-5884 .- 1532-2165. ; 37:1, s. 109-15
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of the status of vascular surgery (VS) training paradigms on the actual practice of endovascular therapy among the European countries. METHODS: An email-based survey concerning vascular surgery training models and endovascular practices of different clinical specialties was distributed to a VS educator within 14 European countries. European Vascular and Endovascular Monitor (EVEM) data also were processed to correlate endovascular practice with training models. RESULTS: Fourteen questionnaires were gathered. Vascular training in Europe appears in 3 models: 1. Mono-specialty (independence): 7 countries, 2. Subspecialty: 5 countries, 3. An existing specialty within general surgery: 2 countries. Independent compared to non-independent certification shortens overall training length (5.9 vs 7.9 years, p=0.006), while increasing overall training devoted specifically to VS (3.9 vs 2.7 years, p=0.008). Among countries with independent certification an average of 76% of aortic and 50% of peripheral endovascular procedures are performed by vascular surgeons, while the corresponding values, for countries with a non-independent certification, are 69% and 36% respectively. Countries with independent vascular certification, despite their lower average endovascular index (procedures per 100,000 population), reported a higher growth rate of aortic endovascular procedures (VS independent 132% vs VS non-independent 87%), within a four-year period (2003-2007). Peripheral endovascular procedures, though, have similar growth rates in both country groups (VS independent 62% vs VS non-independent 60%). CONCLUSIONS: In European countries with VS as an independent specialty, vascular surgeons have a shorter total training period but spend more time in VS training, although they may not undertake a greater proportion of the endovascular procedures their countries appear to have adopted endovascular technologies more rapidly compared to the ones with non-independent VS curricula. Whether such differences influence patient outcomes requires investigation in future studies.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Pandey, V. A., et al.
(författare)
-
The examination assessment of technical competence in vascular surgery
- 2006
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 93:9, s. 1132-1138
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The European Board of Surgery Qualification in Vascular Surgery is a pan-European examination for vascular surgeons who have attained a national certificate of completion of specialist training. A 2-year study was conducted before the introduction of a technical skills assessment in the examination. Methods: The study included 30 surgeons: 22 candidates and eight examiners. They were tested on dissection (on a synthetic saphenofemoral junction model), anastomosis (on to anterior tibial artery of a synthetic leg model) and dexterity (a knot-tying simulator with electromagnetic motion analysis). Validated rating scales were used by two independent examiners. Composite knot-tying scores were calculated for the computerized station. The stations were weighted 35, 45 and 20 per cent, respectively. Results: Examiners performed better than candidates in the dissection (P < 0.001), anastomosis (P = 0.002) and dexterity (P = 0.005) stations. Participants performed consistently in the examination (dissection versus anastomosis: r = 0.79, P < 0.001; dexterity versus total operative score: r = -0.73, P < 0.001). Interobserver reliability was high (alpha = 0.91). No correlation was seen between a candidate's technical skill and oral examination performance or logbook-accredited scores. Conclusion: Current surgical examinations do not address technical competence. This model appears to be a valid assessment of technical skills in an examination setting. The standards are set at a level appropriate for a specialist vascular surgeon.
|
|
