| 1. |
- Feng, Yi, et al.
(författare)
-
Characterization of Inkjet Printed Coplanar Waveguides for Flexible Electronics
- 2011
-
Ingår i: NIP27: International Conference on Digital Printing Technologies and Digital Fabrication 2011. - : The Society for Imaging Science and Technology. - 9780892082964 ; , s. 454-457
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- The low conductivity and thin layers of the inkjet-printed metal conductors have always been a big concern in paper-based printed electronics for high frequency applications. To provide the fundamental knowledge, the high frequency characteristics of inkjet-printed coplanar waveguides on paper substrate were studied experimentally in terms of characteristic impedance and conductor losses using the time domain reflectometry technique. The influences of different printing settings and of geometric parameters on the waveguide's properties were investigated. Considering the measurement accuracy in high frequency characterization, one sample with an impedance of 51.2Ω was achieved. The electrical stability of the samples was also studied and explained. In addition, one waveguide sample was printed in a way that the pattern area with the highest current density is thickened. This variable ink-layer thickness approach has successfully been proven as a promising solution to reduce the conductor losses and yet consuming less ink.
|
|
| 2. |
- Ospel, Johanna M., et al.
(författare)
-
What is a Challenging Clot? : A DELPHI Consensus Statement from the CLOTS 7.0 Summit
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Clinical Neuroradiology. - 1869-1439 .- 1869-1447. ; 33:4, s. 1007-1016
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Predicting a challenging clot when performing mechanical thrombectomy in acute stroke can be difficult. One reason for this difficulty is a lack of agreement on how to precisely define these clots. We explored the opinions of stroke thrombectomy and clot research experts regarding challenging clots, defined as difficult to recanalize clots by endovascular approaches, and clot/patient features that may be indicative of such clots. Methods: A modified DELPHI technique was used before and during the CLOTS 7.0 Summit, which included experts in thrombectomy and clot research from different specialties. The first round included open-ended questions and the second and final rounds each consisted of 30 closed-ended questions, 29 on various clinical and clot features, and 1 on number of passes before switching techniques. Consensus was defined as agreement ≥ 50%. Features with consensus and rated ≥ 3 out of 4 on the certainty scale were included in the definition of a challenging clot. Results: Three DELPHI rounds were performed. Panelists achieved consensus on 16/30 questions, of which 8 were rated 3 or 4 on the certainty scale, namely white-colored clots (mean certainty score 3.1), calcified clots under histology (3.7) and imaging (3.7), stiff clots (3.0), sticky/adherent clots (3.1), hard clots (3.1), difficult to pass clots (3.1) and clots that are resistant to pulling (3.0). Most panelists considered switching endovascular treatment (EVT) techniques after 2–3 unsuccessful attempts. Conclusion: This DELPHI consensus identified 8 distinct features of a challenging clot. The varying degree of certainty amongst the panelists emphasizes the need for more pragmatic studies to enable accurate a priori identification of such occlusions prior to EVT.
|
|
