| 1. |
- Lindhagen, Elin, et al.
(författare)
-
R-etodolac (SDX-101) and the related indole-pyran analogues SDX-308 and SDX-309 potentiate the antileukemic activity of standard cytotoxic agents in primary chronic lymphocytic leukaemia cells
- 2007
-
Ingår i: Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0344-5704 .- 1432-0843. ; 60:4, s. 545-553
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: SDX-101 is the non-cyclooxygenase 2-inhibiting R-enantiomer of the non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug etodolac, and has anti-tumour activity in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). SDX-308 and SDX-309 are more potent, structurally related indole-pyran analogues of SDX-101. The current study was performed to investigate and quantify the cytotoxic potentiating effects resulting from a combination of either SDX-101, SDX-308 or SDX-309 with standard cytotoxic agents used in the CLL treatment today. Methods: The lymphoma cell line U937-gtb was used, together with primary tumour cells isolated from seven CLL patients. Combinations between chlorambucil and each one of the agents etodolac, SDX-101, SDX-308 and SDX-309 were studied. In addition, SDX-309 was combined with fludarabine, doxorubicin or vincristine. Both simultaneous and sequential exposures were explored using the median-effect method. Results: Most combinations were additive, which could be of clinical benefit since SDX-101 has been shown to be well tolerated. At the 70% effect level, synergy was observed between SDX-308 and chlorambucil in U937-gtb cells and in two-third of the CLL samples. Since chlorambucil is the most important drug in CLL therapy today and SDX-308 is presently targeted as the lead clinical candidate, this combination would be interesting for further studies. Vincristine and SDX-309 were synergistic in two-fourth of CLL samples. Conclusions: To conclude, the non-COX-inhibiting etodolac-derivatives SDX-101, SDX-308 and SDX-309 are potential candidates for combination treatment of CLL. Especially, SDX-308 in combination with chlorambucil warrants further evaluation.
|
|
| 2. |
- Lindhagen, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
A more frequent disease monitorering but no increased disease activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic : A retrospective study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. - : Taylor & Francis Group. - 0036-5521 .- 1502-7708. ; 57:2, s. 169-174
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and Aims: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic abruptly switched the healthcare service for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) towards a telemedicine dominated approach. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of this switch on monitoring of patients and on disease activity.Material: The pre-pandemic year included 868 patients and the first year of the pandemic included 891 patients. Medical records were retrospectively checked for contacts, changes in medical treatment, performed fecal calprotectin (FC) tests and colonoscopies.Results: The scheduled follow-up visits to a doctor for patients with IBD shifted from mostly face-to-face pre-pandemic (from 389 to 118 appointments) to mostly telephone-based during the pandemic (from 13 to 423 appointments). There was a 21.3% increase in mean overall scheduled health contacts (p <.001) and a 20.0% increase for the mean number of FC tests (p <.001) in the year of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic year. The proportion of patients who had a surveillance colonoscopy was significant lower in the year of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic year (12.7% vs 20.1%; p =.002). There were no difference in the proportion of patients with a median FC > 200 mg/kg (18.2% vs 17.1%; p =.767) and in the proportion of patients who changed their medical treatment (24.7% vs 23.9%; p =.713) in the first year of the pandemic compared to the prepandemic year.Conclusions: The shift towards a telemedicine oriented IBD healthcare service in the first year of the pandemic significantly increased the scheduled contacts, as well as the frequency of FC testing. However, there was a significant decrease in performed surveillance colonoscopies. Between the two periods observed, the patients showed no difference in medical treatment or in disease activity.
|
|
